Scanned sites / harrdental.com

SEO report for harrdental.com DR 16

The latest Site Spider scan of harrdental.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/harrdental-com/2026-09-12-2212.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 22:12:00 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 23:11:42 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://harrdental.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

56/ 100Needs work

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 312 pages and 477 assets of harrdental.com, starting from https://harrdental.com/. It scored 56 out of 100, a result that needs work. 10 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by non-200 responses (101), meta descriptions (101), duplicate content (101); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to non-200 responses (−9.4), meta descriptions (−7.5), duplicate content (−7.5). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
312
Assets fetched
477
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

789 of 789 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 310 link destinations on other sites were checked, 55 left unchecked.

  • Title tags30 issues
    30 of 102 pages have title issues. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.8 points
  • Meta descriptions101 issues
    101 of 102 pages have meta description issues. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.5 points
  • Headings38 issues
    38 of 102 pages have heading issues. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites74 issues
    74 destinations answered with an error, 40 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 55 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −4 points
  • Redirects103 issues
    104 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −3.8 points
  • Non-200 responses101 issues
    205 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 204 of them are pages, 101 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −9.4 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 108 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 575 image references have no alt attribute. 401 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets26 issues
    26 assets larger than 500 KB among 477 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages4 issues
    4 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage7 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 99 URLs: 3 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.4 points
  • Internal link counts37 noted
    Internal link counts for 108 pages; 37 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 102 pages have fewer than 200 words. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content101 issues
    8 groups of pages with identical HTML.
    −7.5 points
  • URL format212 noted
    212 of 312 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals6 noted
    6 of 108 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives108 noted
    108 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text38 noted
    38 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure26 noted
    26 of 102 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length58 noted
    58 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 108 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 789 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 108 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2339 sites, median 79%, average 78%

harrdental.com scores 56%, higher than 4% of the 2339 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites56% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site requires attention on several fronts, including redirect issues, non-200 responses, and significant problems with titles and meta descriptions. Addressing these will enhance overall performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 104 redirects can slow down site performance and lead to user frustration.

    How: Identify redirects with 404 final statuses and remove them or update links. Ensure no chained redirects exist.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 205 non-200 responses lead to poor user experience and can impact SEO negatively.

    How: Review URLs returning non-200 statuses, correcting them to return a 200 response where necessary or removing them.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 30 pages have title issues that may affect search visibility.

    How: Adjust titles to ensure they are within 30-60 characters and meaningful for users.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 101 meta descriptions are missing or inadequate, impacting click-through rates.

    How: Write unique, compelling meta descriptions for each page within 150-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Correct Heading Issues

    Why: Multiple headings or missing H1s hurt content structure and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has one clear H1 and avoid multiple H1s; use H2s correctly.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages lack visibility, harming site structure and user navigation.

    How: Create internal links to orphan pages from relevant content to improve their accessibility.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has significant security gaps, including the absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security and Content Security Policy, exposing users to potential interceptions and script injection. Addressing these issues is crucial to safeguard against common web vulnerabilities.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may be vulnerable to interception on their first request to the site.

    Fix: Implement HSTS by adding the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: The site lacks a CSP, which could allow malicious scripts to be loaded.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: The absence of this header makes the site vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the X-Frame-Options header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers can incorrectly handle file types, potentially leading to security issues.

    Fix: Include the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-party scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Third-party scripts can be compromised, impacting site security.

    Fix: Consider implementing SRI where possible, or use a CSP to restrict sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://harrdental.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://harrdental.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://harrdental.com/meet-our-team/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://harrdental.com/office-tour/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://harrdental.com/new-patients/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://harrdental.com/patient-concerns/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://harrdental.com/tooth-discomfort/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://harrdental.com/post-op-instructions/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://harrdental.com/request-an-appointment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://harrdental.com/advanced-technology/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://harrdental.com/emergencycare/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://harrdental.com/financial-policies/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 108 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://harrdental.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://harrdental.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://harrdental.com/meet-our-team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://harrdental.com/office-tour/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://harrdental.com/new-patients/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://harrdental.com/patient-concerns/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://harrdental.com/tooth-discomfort/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://harrdental.com/post-op-instructions/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://harrdental.com/request-an-appointment/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://harrdental.com/advanced-technology/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://harrdental.com/emergencycare/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://harrdental.com/financial-policies/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://harrdental.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://harrdental.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://harrdental.com/meet-our-team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://harrdental.com/office-tour/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://harrdental.com/new-patients/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://harrdental.com/patient-concerns/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://harrdental.com/tooth-discomfort/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://harrdental.com/post-op-instructions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://harrdental.com/request-an-appointment/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://harrdental.com/advanced-technology/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://harrdental.com/emergencycare/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://harrdental.com/financial-policies/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://harrdental.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://harrdental.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://harrdental.com/meet-our-team/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://harrdental.com/office-tour/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://harrdental.com/new-patients/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://harrdental.com/patient-concerns/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://harrdental.com/tooth-discomfort/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://harrdental.com/post-op-instructions/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://harrdental.com/request-an-appointment/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://harrdental.com/advanced-technology/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://harrdental.com/emergencycare/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://harrdental.com/financial-policies/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.userway.org (40 script tags)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 108 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    8 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of harrdental.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near harrdental.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling harrdental.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own harrdental.com?