Scanned sites / www.optometristsclinic.com / 2026-09-12-1751
www.optometristsclinic.com scan from 2026-09-12 17:51:50 UTC DR 32
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-09-12-1751
Scanned 2026-09-12 17:51:50 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 21:33:09 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results
Site: https://www.optometristsclinic.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 336 pages and 1000 assets of www.optometristsclinic.com, starting from https://www.optometristsclinic.com/. It scored 78 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (29), title tags (179), sitemap coverage (270); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−5.7), sitemap coverage (−5.1). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 336
- Assets fetched
- 1000
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 10 of 27
1,336 of 1,336 discovered URLs were fetched, 216 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 109 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags179 issues179 of 270 pages have title issues. 46 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−5.7 points
- Meta descriptions168 issues168 of 270 pages have meta description issues. 46 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−4.3 points
- Headings13 issues13 of 270 pages have heading issues. 46 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−0.2 points
- Broken links1 issue1 internal link point at 1 broken URL.−0.1 points
- Links to other sites1 issue1 destination answered with an error, 84 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 109 destinations checked.−0.1 points
- Redirects19 issues20 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.−0.2 points
- Non-200 responses1 issue22 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 20 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability9 issues9 of 279 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 37 pages noindex by design.−0.3 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 1500 image references have no alt attribute. 61 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets29 issues29 assets larger than 500 KB among 1000 fetched assets.−6 points
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage270 issues1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 270 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.−5.1 points
- Internal link counts120 notedInternal link counts for 316 pages; 120 worth a look.
- Thin contentOK0 of 270 pages have fewer than 200 words. 46 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL format7 noted7 of 336 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- Canonicals46 noted46 of 316 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives316 noted316 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
- Anchor text101 noted101 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure40 noted40 of 270 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 46 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length41 noted39 images over 100 KB; 2 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomalies2 noted2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
- HTML and head validationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- hreflangNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Structured dataNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Near duplicatesNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 316 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
- PaginationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 1336 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 316 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed Insights5 notedMobile performance 60 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
- SpellingNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2859 sites, median 80%, average 79%
www.optometristsclinic.com scores 78%, higher than 39% of the 2859 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsWritten from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.
The site has a good health score but has some issues needing attention. Focus on fixing broken links, redirects, and improving title tags, meta descriptions, headings, and the sitemap coverage for better SEO performance.
- 1
Fix Broken Links
Why: One broken link can hinder user experience and SEO ranking.
How: Update or remove the internal link pointing to the broken URL.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Resolve Redirects
Why: Too many redirects can slow down the site and cause user frustration.
How: Remove unnecessary redirects and fix the chained redirect.
Checks: redirects
- 3
Address Non-200 Responses
Why: URLs not returning 2xx responses can affect user experience and SEO.
How: Identify and repair or remove the non-200 URLs.
Checks: status-codes
- 4
Improve Title Tags
Why: 179 pages have long or problematic title tags; this affects search rankings.
How: Shorten titles to under 60 characters for affected pages.
Checks: titles
- 5
Fix Meta Descriptions
Why: Missing meta descriptions can lower click-through rates from search results.
How: Add unique meta descriptions for the 19 pages lacking them.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 6
Enhance Sitemap Coverage
Why: Sitemap is empty which affects how search engines crawl your site.
How: Update the sitemap to include all 270 crawled pages.
Checks: sitemap-coverage
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe website has several security vulnerabilities that could expose users to risks. Notably, it lacks important security headers like HSTS and X-Frame-Options, which could lead to attacks like man-in-the-middle and clickjacking. Additionally, the use of third-party scripts without integrity verification poses a potential risk.
- 0 high
- 2 medium
- 2 low
- 1 info
- 1
Missing HSTS HeaderMedium
Why it matters: No HTML page sends 'Strict-Transport-Security'. This increases the risk of man-in-the-middle attacks.
Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to your web server configuration.
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium
Why it matters: Absence of 'X-Frame-Options' allows clickjacking attacks by embedding your pages in malicious frames.
Fix: Configure your web server to send 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' or implement a CSP with frame-ancestors.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 3
Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow
Why it matters: Without 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff', browsers may execute files as scripts based on content.
Fix: Set the header 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' in your server settings to mitigate risks.
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 4
Third-party Scripts Without IntegrityLow
Why it matters: Scripts from unverified sources can lead to site compromise if those sources are attacked.
Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity for third-party scripts or use a strict Content-Security-Policy that restricts where scripts can be loaded from.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
- 5
Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo
Why it matters: The robots.txt file discloses paths that appear private, providing attackers a potential attack vector.
Fix: Ensure that sensitive paths have proper access controls rather than relying solely on robots.txt to restrict search engine indexing.
Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/our-team/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/promotions/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/hiring/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/eye-exams/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/general-exams/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/pediatric-exams/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/eye-exams-for-seniors/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/diabetic-eye-exams/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/optical-coherence-tomography-exams/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/ocular-health/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/visual-field-test/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/our-team/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/promotions/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/hiring/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/eye-exams/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/general-exams/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/pediatric-exams/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/eye-exams-for-seniors/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/diabetic-eye-exams/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/optical-coherence-tomography-exams/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/ocular-health/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/visual-field-test/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/our-team/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/promotions/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/hiring/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/eye-exams/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/general-exams/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/pediatric-exams/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/eye-exams-for-seniors/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/diabetic-eye-exams/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/optical-coherence-tomography-exams/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/ocular-health/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.optometristsclinic.com/visual-field-test/ → no x-content-type-options
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
- cdn.trustindex.io (2 script tags)
- www.google.com (40 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 316 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKContent Security Policy
A Content-Security-Policy is set.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
80 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries
2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- Not applicableReferrer policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicablePermissions policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableCookie flags
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near www.optometristsclinic.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- bakerandspicecalgary.comDR 978/100 · rank 1610 · 28 pages
- greatplainschiro.comDR 178/100 · rank 1610 · 84 pages
- taxbc.caDR 878/100 · rank 1610 · 67 pages
- lilaccityveterinaryservices.comDR 078/100 · rank 1610 · 33 pages
- reddeerdancemagic.comDR 1478/100 · rank 1610 · 234 pages
- skyecafeandbistro.comDR 2378/100 · rank 1610 · 9 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.optometristsclinic.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.optometristsclinic.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.optometristsclinic.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.