Scanned sites / lilaccityveterinaryservices.com

SEO report for lilaccityveterinaryservices.com DR 0

The latest Site Spider scan of lilaccityveterinaryservices.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/lilaccityveterinaryservices-com/2026-09-12-1937.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 19:37:27 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 20:22:51 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://lilaccityveterinaryservices.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

78/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 33 pages and 248 assets of lilaccityveterinaryservices.com, starting from https://lilaccityveterinaryservices.com/. It scored 78 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (22), heavy assets (11), meta descriptions (11); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−7.3), heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−2.9). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
33
Assets fetched
248
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

281 of 282 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 13 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags22 issues
    22 of 30 pages have title issues.
    −7.3 points
  • Meta descriptions11 issues
    11 of 30 pages have meta description issues.
    −2.9 points
  • Headings5 issues
    5 of 30 pages have heading issues.
    −1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites93 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 6 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 12 destinations checked.
  • Redirects3 issues
    4 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses18 noted
    18 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 3 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 30 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 119 image references have no alt attribute. 46 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets11 issues
    11 assets larger than 500 KB among 248 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages10 issues
    10 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage10 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 30 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 10 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 30 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content4 issues
    4 of 30 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −1.1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 33 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 30 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives30 noted
    30 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text4 noted
    4 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure4 noted
    4 of 30 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length9 noted
    9 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 30 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 281 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 30 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 49 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2860 sites, median 80%, average 79%

lilaccityveterinaryservices.com scores 78%, higher than 39% of the 2860 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 131 sites79%: 110 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 81 sites89%: 76 sites90%: 54 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites78% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several areas needing attention, particularly with redirects, non-200 responses, title tags, and headings. Addressing these will enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 18 URLs returning errors can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Redirect or correct broken links, ensuring they return valid 2xx responses.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Address Redirects

    Why: 4 redirects may create unnecessary page load delays.

    How: Simplify or eliminate redirects by updating internal links to direct URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Revise Title Tags

    Why: 22 out of 30 pages have title issues, affecting search visibility.

    How: Rewrite titles to be unique and under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Headings

    Why: 5 pages lack proper H1 tags, preventing content clarity.

    How: Add suitable H1 tags to pages with missing or multiple H1s.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 8 pages have issues that can hinder click-through rates.

    How: Craft unique meta descriptions of up to 160 characters for each affected page.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: 10 orphan pages lack internal links, reducing their visibility.

    How: Add internal links from relevant pages to these orphan pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks a Content Security Policy, making it vulnerable to attacks from malicious scripts and resources. Third-party scripts pose additional risks as they don't have Subresource Integrity. The robots.txt file exposes a sensitive path that should be protected. Addressing these areas will enhance overall security.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, there's no control over where resources can be loaded from, increasing the risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy header with appropriate directives, such as: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' www.google.com;

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from www.google.com do not utilize Subresource Integrity, allowing potential manipulation if the external source is compromised.

    Fix: Add Subresource Integrity checks to each script tag or implement a Content-Security-Policy that limits sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file discloses a private admin path, which could expose the site to probing attacks.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths using server-side authentication and remove or limit disclosures in robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 30 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://lilaccityveterinaryservices.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lilaccityveterinaryservices.com/about-lilac-city-veterinary-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lilaccityveterinaryservices.com/veterinarian-spokane-wa/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lilaccityveterinaryservices.com/veterinarian-spokane-wa-reviews/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lilaccityveterinaryservices.com/spokane-wa-veterinary-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lilaccityveterinaryservices.com/lilac-city-veterinary-services-payment-options/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lilaccityveterinaryservices.com/pet-emergency-spokane-wa/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lilaccityveterinaryservices.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lilaccityveterinaryservices.com/pet-general-wellness-spokane-wa/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lilaccityveterinaryservices.com/pet-surgery-spokane-wa/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lilaccityveterinaryservices.com/pet-out-lab-diagnostics-spokane-wa/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lilaccityveterinaryservices.com/pet-dentistry-spokane-wa/ → no content-security-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (27 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 30 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    29 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of lilaccityveterinaryservices.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near lilaccityveterinaryservices.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling lilaccityveterinaryservices.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own lilaccityveterinaryservices.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming lilaccityveterinaryservices.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.