Scanned sites / www.odinseyetattoo.com / 2026-09-11-1726

www.odinseyetattoo.com scan from 2026-09-11 17:26:48 UTC DR 21

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.odinseyetattoo.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-1726

Scanned 2026-09-11 17:26:48 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 18:24:18 UTC

Site: https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

65/ 100Needs work

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 43 pages and 1057 assets of www.odinseyetattoo.com, starting from https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/. It scored 65 out of 100, a result that needs work. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (27), meta descriptions (30), heavy assets (78); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−8.4), meta descriptions (−7.5), heavy assets (−6). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
43
Assets fetched
1057
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,100 of 1,100 discovered URLs were fetched, 60 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 30 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags27 issues
    27 of 31 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −8.4 points
  • Meta descriptions30 issues
    30 of 31 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −7.5 points
  • Headings28 issues
    28 of 31 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −5.3 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites26 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 25 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 28 destinations checked.
  • Redirects11 issues
    12 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1.4 points
  • Non-200 responses12 noted
    12 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 11 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 32 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 497 image references have no alt attribute. 497 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets78 issues
    78 assets larger than 500 KB among 1057 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages3 issues
    3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage31 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 31 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.8 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 32 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 31 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 43 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 32 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives32 noted
    32 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text33 noted
    33 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1 noted
    1 of 31 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length180 noted
    180 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies8 noted
    8 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 32 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 1100 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 32 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 59 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2326 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.odinseyetattoo.com scores 65%, higher than 10% of the 2326 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 11 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 73 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 23 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites65% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The website has multiple SEO issues, including title and meta description problems, as well as orphan pages. Prioritizing these fixes can significantly improve SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tags

    Why: 27 out of 31 pages have title issues, impacting search ranking.

    How: Revise title tags to be unique and within 50-60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Add Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: 30 out of 31 pages lack meta descriptions, reducing click-through rates.

    How: Create unique, engaging meta descriptions for each page, keeping them under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 12 URLs are not returning a 2xx response, affecting site accessibility.

    How: Redirect or fix the 301 pages to ensure all URLs return a 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Create Internal Links for Orphan Pages

    Why: 3 orphan pages lack internal links, impacting their discoverability.

    How: Link to these pages from relevant existing pages within the site.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  5. 5

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Sitemap is missing many crawled pages, limiting search engine indexing.

    How: Update the sitemap to include all indexable pages and submit to search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Reduce Heavy Assets

    Why: 78 assets larger than 500 KB may slow site performance.

    How: Optimize images using compression tools and consider using lazy loading.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has several key security vulnerabilities that need addressing, including a lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security and Content Security Policy headers. Additionally, the absence of X-Frame-Options exposes the site to clickjacking risks. Implementing these protections will significantly improve security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks when accessing the site via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: The absence of a CSP allows potentially malicious content to be loaded, endangering users.

    Fix: Add a CSP header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' www.google.com.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks, where malicious sites can overlay the site in a frame.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, there is a risk of MIME type confusion, which can lead to security issues.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: The use of scripts from an external domain without integrity checks can lead to unexpected behaviors if compromised.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for scripts or use a Content Security Policy that limits external sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Listing paths like /wp-admin/ in robots.txt can expose them to probing since this file is publicly accessible.

    Fix: Remove sensitive paths from robots.txt and secure them with proper access controls instead.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/our-studios → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/artists → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/aftercare → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/portfolio → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/ashley → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/daria → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/dat-nguyen → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/ellen → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/erin → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/hao → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/igors → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 32 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/our-studios → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/artists → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/aftercare → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/portfolio → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/ashley → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/daria → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/dat-nguyen → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/ellen → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/erin → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/hao → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/igors → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/our-studios → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/artists → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/aftercare → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/portfolio → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/ashley → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/daria → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/dat-nguyen → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/ellen → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/erin → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/hao → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/igors → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/our-studios → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/artists → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/aftercare → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/portfolio → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/ashley → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/daria → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/dat-nguyen → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/ellen → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/erin → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/hao → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.odinseyetattoo.com/igors → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 32 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.odinseyetattoo.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.odinseyetattoo.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.odinseyetattoo.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.odinseyetattoo.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.