Scanned sites / www.chapmanriebeek.com

SEO report for www.chapmanriebeek.com

The latest Site Spider scan of www.chapmanriebeek.com, with 2 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-chapmanriebeek-com/2026-10-03-1230.

Latest scan

Scanned 10/3/2026, 12:30:37 PM, finished 10/3/2026, 1:23:18 PM. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

65/ 100Needs work

On October 3, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 71 pages and 150 assets of www.chapmanriebeek.com, starting from https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/. It scored 65 out of 100, a result that needs work. 5 of 16 checks found something to fix, led by broken links (49), non-200 responses (49), sitemap coverage (9); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to broken links (−20), non-200 responses (−10), sitemap coverage (−3.2). 1 check found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
71
Assets fetched
150
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
5 of 16
CoverageComplete crawl

221 of 221 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 6 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tagsOK
    0 of 17 pages have title issues.
  • Meta descriptions1 issue
    1 of 17 pages have meta description issues.
    −0.5 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 17 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken links49 issues
    323 internal links point at 49 broken URLs.
    −20 points
  • Links to other sitesOK
    0 destinations answered with an error, of 6 destinations checked.
  • Redirects5 issues
    5 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1.2 points
  • Non-200 responses49 issues
    56 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 54 of them are pages, 49 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −10 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 17 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 33 image references have no alt attribute. 2 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 150 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage9 issues
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/sitemap.xml (403), https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/sitemap_index.xml (403). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3.2 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 17 pages.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 17 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.

What changed since the last scan

-29 points

www.chapmanriebeek.com lost 29 points since the previous scan, moving from 94 to 65 out of 100. 213 findings changed. 127 URLs the earlier crawl reached were not reached this time. The crawl reached 60 fewer pages than last time, 71 in total, so some of the change is a change in what was crawled.

  • Pages: 23 gone, 29 not re-checked
  • Broken links: 49 new
  • Page status codes: 2 new, 33 gone, 47 changed
  • Redirects: 25 gone, 33 not re-checked
  • Internal links to the page: 17 changed
  • Sitemap inclusion: 17 changed
  • 127 URLs from the earlier crawl were not reached this time
  1. 10/2/2026, 5:00:28 PM94/100131 pages
  2. 10/3/2026, 12:30:37 PM65/10071 pages

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

1968 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.chapmanriebeek.com scores 65%, higher than 9% of the 1968 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0561120%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 2 sites38%: 2 sites39%: 1 site40%: 2 sites41%: 2 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 1 site44%: 0 sites45%: 4 sites46%: 3 sites47%: 3 sites48%: 2 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 4 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 7 sites55%: 5 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 7 sites58%: 15 sites59%: 7 sites60%: 10 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 17 sites63%: 16 sites64%: 11 sites65%: 23 sites66%: 23 sites67%: 37 sites68%: 30 sites69%: 27 sites70%: 39 sites71%: 41 sites72%: 59 sites73%: 53 sites74%: 51 sites75%: 63 sites76%: 79 sites77%: 76 sites78%: 92 sites79%: 72 sites80%: 93 sites81%: 112 sites82%: 87 sites83%: 90 sites84%: 89 sites85%: 72 sites86%: 77 sites87%: 68 sites88%: 66 sites89%: 56 sites90%: 38 sites91%: 38 sites92%: 30 sites93%: 17 sites94%: 12 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 8 sites97%: 8 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 55 sites65% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The website has several broken internal links, generating 403 errors. A sitemap is also missing. Addressing these issues will improve user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Internal Links

    Why: 323 internal links point at 49 broken URLs, damaging user experience.

    How: Identify broken URLs and either update them or remove links pointing to deleted pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 56 URLs return non-2xx statuses, impacting access and indexing.

    How: Check the related URLs and address the issues by making them return 200 responses.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Add a Sitemap

    Why: A sitemap is critical for search engines to discover pages.

    How: Create a sitemap and upload it at /sitemap.xml, linking it in robots.txt.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 1 out of 17 pages has meta description issues that may cut off in SERPs.

    How: Adjust the meta description to be concise and within the optimal length.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Redirects

    Why: 5 URLs redirect, which can slow down site performance.

    How: Review and ensure redirects are necessary; if not, eliminate them.

    Checks: redirects

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security vulnerabilities that need attention. The absence of critical headers leaves it exposed to threats such as man-in-the-middle attacks and clickjacking. Implementing recommended security headers can significantly enhance your site's protection.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted if they enter the URL without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: The lack of CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts and resources, increasing vulnerability to attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, your site can be embedded in a frame, making it susceptible to clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret files based on their contents.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Absence of this header allows exposure of full URLs to sites visitors navigate to.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: This header can limit functionality of features not used, reducing potential exploit risks.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=() (adjust based on actual feature use).

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/red-deer/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/red-deer/family-lawyer/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/nancy-bergstrom/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/suzanne-alexander-smith/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/shawn-frank/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/corbin-zoeteman/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/miete-penedo-costa/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/mathew-james/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/nadine-gerig/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/kaylee-lukawiecki/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 17 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/red-deer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/red-deer/family-lawyer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/nancy-bergstrom/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/suzanne-alexander-smith/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/shawn-frank/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/corbin-zoeteman/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/miete-penedo-costa/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/mathew-james/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/nadine-gerig/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/kaylee-lukawiecki/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/red-deer/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/red-deer/family-lawyer/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/nancy-bergstrom/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/suzanne-alexander-smith/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/shawn-frank/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/corbin-zoeteman/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/miete-penedo-costa/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/mathew-james/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/nadine-gerig/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/kaylee-lukawiecki/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/red-deer/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/red-deer/family-lawyer/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/nancy-bergstrom/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/suzanne-alexander-smith/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/shawn-frank/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/corbin-zoeteman/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/miete-penedo-costa/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/mathew-james/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/nadine-gerig/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/kaylee-lukawiecki/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/red-deer/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/red-deer/family-lawyer/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/nancy-bergstrom/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/suzanne-alexander-smith/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/shawn-frank/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/corbin-zoeteman/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/miete-penedo-costa/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/mathew-james/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/nadine-gerig/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/kaylee-lukawiecki/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/red-deer/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/red-deer/family-lawyer/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/nancy-bergstrom/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/suzanne-alexander-smith/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/shawn-frank/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/corbin-zoeteman/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/miete-penedo-costa/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/mathew-james/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/nadine-gerig/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.chapmanriebeek.com/our-lawyers/kaylee-lukawiecki/ → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (17 script tags)
    • www.google.com (11 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 17 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    14 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.chapmanriebeek.com

Sites scoring near www.chapmanriebeek.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.chapmanriebeek.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.chapmanriebeek.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.chapmanriebeek.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.chapmanriebeek.com SEO report | DIY SEO Hub