Scanned sites / www.neiep.org / 2026-09-13-1307

www.neiep.org scan from 2026-09-13 13:07:12 UTC DR 54

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-1307

Scanned 2026-09-13 13:07:12 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 13:46:12 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.neiep.org/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 202 pages and 203 assets of www.neiep.org, starting from https://www.neiep.org/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by indexability (136), links to other sites (181), heavy assets (5); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to indexability (−6.8), links to other sites (−4), heavy assets (−3). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
202
Assets fetched
203
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

405 of 406 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 398 left unchecked.

  • Title tags27 issues
    27 of 65 pages have title issues. 135 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.4 points
  • Meta descriptions22 issues
    22 of 65 pages have meta description issues. 135 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.9 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 65 pages have heading issues. 135 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites181 issues
    181 destinations answered with an error, 45 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 398 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −4 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    4 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses4 noted
    4 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability136 issues
    136 of 199 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
    −6.8 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 13 image references have no alt attribute. 9 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets5 issues
    5 assets larger than 500 KB among 203 fetched assets. 2 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −3 points
  • Orphan pages27 issues
    27 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage27 issues
    8 sitemaps listing 63 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 27 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.8 points
  • Internal link counts3 noted
    Internal link counts for 200 pages; 3 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 65 pages have fewer than 200 words. 135 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 202 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals135 noted
    135 of 200 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives200 noted
    200 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure22 noted
    22 of 65 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 135 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 200 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 405 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 200 pages; 146 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2346 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.neiep.org scores 83%, higher than 64% of the 2346 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 102 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 17 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has some SEO issues that need addressing, particularly with redirects, non-200 responses, and title/meta description tags. Prioritizing these fixes will improve your site's visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirection issues can confuse search engines and users.

    How: Update the redirect URLs to point directly to the final destination where possible.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages returning non-200 responses can hurt your site's SEO.

    How: Identify problematic URLs and fix their status codes to return 200.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Long title tags can be truncated in search results, impacting click-through rates.

    How: Shorten the title tags to within 60 characters for affected pages.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Long meta descriptions may be cut off in search results, affecting user engagement.

    How: Edit meta descriptions to meet a maximum length of 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Structure

    Why: Multiple H1 tags can confuse search engines and affect ranking.

    How: Ensure there is only one H1 tag per page and adjust others to H2 or H3.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages may not be indexed properly, losing out on potential traffic.

    How: Add internal links to these pages from your relevant content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your site has several security issues that need attention, primarily missing critical headers and an outdated JavaScript library. Implementing these changes will help protect your visitors and improve your site's security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted during their first request if they type the address without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains'.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, the site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, your pages can be embedded in frames, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: 'X-Frame-Options: DENY'.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Outdated jQuery Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: The version 0.11.1 has known vulnerabilities that may be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or higher.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: The API key found is publicly accessible and could be abused.

    Fix: Restrict the API key in the Google Cloud console to specific HTTP referrers.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  6. 6

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may wrongly execute files as scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff'.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.neiep.org/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.neiep.org/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.neiep.org/newsroom/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.neiep.org/about/gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.neiep.org/about/work-at-neiep/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.neiep.org/contact-us → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.neiep.org/continuing-education-courses/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.neiep.org/neiep-college-transfer-programs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.neiep.org/apprenticeship-courses/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.neiep.org/elevator-apprenticeship-recruitment-opportunities/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.neiep.org/iuec-apprenticeship-faq/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.neiep.org/industry-safety-partners/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 200 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.neiep.org/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.neiep.org/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.neiep.org/newsroom/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.neiep.org/about/gallery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.neiep.org/about/work-at-neiep/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.neiep.org/contact-us → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.neiep.org/continuing-education-courses/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.neiep.org/neiep-college-transfer-programs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.neiep.org/apprenticeship-courses/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.neiep.org/elevator-apprenticeship-recruitment-opportunities/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.neiep.org/iuec-apprenticeship-faq/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.neiep.org/industry-safety-partners/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.neiep.org/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/newsroom/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/about/gallery/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/about/work-at-neiep/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/contact-us → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/continuing-education-courses/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/neiep-college-transfer-programs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/apprenticeship-courses/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/elevator-apprenticeship-recruitment-opportunities/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/iuec-apprenticeship-faq/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/industry-safety-partners/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.neiep.org/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/newsroom/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/about/gallery/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/about/work-at-neiep/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/contact-us → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/continuing-education-courses/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/neiep-college-transfer-programs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/apprenticeship-courses/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/elevator-apprenticeship-recruitment-opportunities/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/iuec-apprenticeship-faq/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.neiep.org/industry-safety-partners/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 0.11.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 0.11.1 in https://www.neiep.org/wp-content/plugins/mapsvg/js/vendor/typeahead/typeahead.j…: CVE-2012-6708 (selector XSS), CVE-2015-9251, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023; fixed in 3.5.0
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…nE (39 chars) in https://www.neiep.org/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
5 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 200 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    93 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.neiep.org

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.neiep.org from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.neiep.org?