Scanned sites / tuffexteriors.com

SEO report for tuffexteriors.com DR 5

The latest Site Spider scan of tuffexteriors.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/tuffexteriors-com/2026-09-13-1402.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 14:02:19 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 14:34:19 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://tuffexteriors.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 28 pages and 360 assets of tuffexteriors.com, starting from https://tuffexteriors.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (37), meta descriptions (12), title tags (5); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.2), title tags (−2.2). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
28
Assets fetched
360
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

388 of 389 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 failed. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 15 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags5 issues
    5 of 17 pages have title issues. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.2 points
  • Meta descriptions12 issues
    12 of 17 pages have meta description issues. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.2 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 17 pages have heading issues. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 6 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 15 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects5 issues
    6 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.9 points
  • Non-200 responses7 noted
    7 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 5 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 18 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 5 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text14 issues
    14 of 203 image references have no alt attribute.
    −0.4 points
  • Heavy assets37 issues
    37 assets larger than 500 KB among 360 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages4 issues
    4 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.7 points
  • Sitemap coverage4 issues
    2 sitemaps listing 17 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1 points
  • Internal link counts5 noted
    Internal link counts for 23 pages; 5 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 17 pages have fewer than 200 words. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.3 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 28 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals6 noted
    6 of 23 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives23 noted
    23 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text7 noted
    7 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure6 noted
    6 of 17 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length49 noted
    49 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies4 noted
    4 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 23 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 388 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 23 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 75 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2346 sites, median 79%, average 78%

tuffexteriors.com scores 83%, higher than 64% of the 2346 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 102 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 17 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has a good health score, but improvements can enhance SEO. Prioritize fixing redirects, title and meta description issues, and adding image alt text.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can dilute link equity and harm user experience.

    How: Update or remove the 6 redirecting URLs to point directly to their final destinations.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages with non-200 responses hinder access and indexability.

    How: Investigate and fix the 7 URLs that do not return a 2xx status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Title tags affect search engine visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Update the 5 pages with title issues to fit within recommended lengths.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions need to be concise to entice clicks from search results.

    How: Revise the 4 pages with meta description issues to be within the 160 character limit.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Alt Text to Images

    Why: Alt text improves accessibility and may enhance search visibility.

    How: Add descriptive alt text to the 14 images lacking it.

    Checks: images-alt

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages are hard to discover and may not be indexed.

    How: Add internal links to the 4 orphan pages from relevant locations on your site.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website tuffexteriors.com has several security issues that could leave both the site and its visitors vulnerable. You should prioritize the implementation of strict transport security, content security policies, and clickjacking protections, as well as updating vulnerable libraries. These changes will help enhance the security of your site.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted if they forget to use HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, your site is vulnerable to various attacks, including XSS.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Not having this header allows clickjacking attacks through iframe embedding.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 3.2.1 has known exploits that might be exploitable depending on usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may misinterpret files, leading to security issues.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    No Subresource Integrity on Third-Party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Without SRI, modifications to scripts from third-party domains can compromise your site.

    Fix: Consider implementing a CSP that allows only trusted domains, or use SRI where possible.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://tuffexteriors.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/flat_roofing_specialists/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/residential-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/commercial-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/industrial-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/silicone-roof-coating/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/specialty-products/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/featured-work/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/certifications/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/contact/?button=contact&location=navbar → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 23 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://tuffexteriors.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/flat_roofing_specialists/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/residential-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/commercial-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/industrial-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/silicone-roof-coating/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/specialty-products/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/featured-work/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/certifications/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/contact/?button=contact&location=navbar → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://tuffexteriors.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/flat_roofing_specialists/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/residential-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/commercial-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/industrial-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/silicone-roof-coating/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/specialty-products/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/featured-work/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/certifications/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/careers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/contact/?button=contact&location=navbar → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://tuffexteriors.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/flat_roofing_specialists/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/residential-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/commercial-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/industrial-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/silicone-roof-coating/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/specialty-products/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/featured-work/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/certifications/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/careers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tuffexteriors.com/contact/?button=contact&location=navbar → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.2.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.2.1 in https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.2.1/jquery.min.js?ver=3..2.1: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (23 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (23 script tags)
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 23 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    4 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of tuffexteriors.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near tuffexteriors.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling tuffexteriors.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own tuffexteriors.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming tuffexteriors.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.