Scanned sites / www.lifetime-eyecare.ca / 2026-09-11-1921

www.lifetime-eyecare.ca scan from 2026-09-11 19:21:52 UTC DR 3

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.lifetime-eyecare.ca.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-1921

Scanned 2026-09-11 19:21:52 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 19:42:34 UTC

Site: https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

87/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 421 pages and 140 assets of www.lifetime-eyecare.ca, starting from https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/. It scored 87 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by sitemap coverage (204), title tags (98), meta descriptions (119); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to sitemap coverage (−3.4), title tags (−2.7), meta descriptions (−2.6). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
421
Assets fetched
140
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

561 of 561 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 151 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags98 issues
    98 of 285 pages have title issues. 76 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • Meta descriptions119 issues
    119 of 285 pages have meta description issues. 76 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.6 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 285 pages have heading issues. 76 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites7 issues
    7 destinations answered with an error, 87 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 149 destinations checked.
    −0.8 points
  • Redirects60 issues
    64 redirecting URLs, 13 of them chained.
    −0.7 points
  • Non-200 responses64 noted
    64 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 60 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability11 issues
    11 of 302 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 59 pages noindex by design.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt text71 issues
    71 of 2914 image references have no alt attribute. 1 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.1 points
  • Heavy assets4 issues
    4 assets larger than 500 KB among 140 fetched assets.
    −2.4 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage204 issues
    1 sitemap listing 81 URLs: 204 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.4 points
  • Internal link counts67 noted
    Internal link counts for 361 pages; 67 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 285 pages have fewer than 200 words. 76 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format106 noted
    106 of 421 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals19 noted
    19 of 361 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives247 noted
    247 pages carry a robots directive; 114 carry none.
  • Anchor text175 noted
    175 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure22 noted
    22 of 285 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 76 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length3 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 3 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s2 noted
    2 pages answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 561 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 361 pages; 226 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 77 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2325 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.lifetime-eyecare.ca scores 87%, higher than 80% of the 2325 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 76 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites87% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks crucial security measures affecting data integrity and access security. Key issues include missing HSTS for secure connections, exposure of server version details, and a publicly accessible Google API key. These vulnerabilities could be exploited if not addressed promptly.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of HSTS allows potential interception on the first request if users type the address without HTTPS.

    Fix: Implement HSTS by adding the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: The Google API key is accessible in the page code, risking unauthorized use and potential charges.

    Fix: Restrict the API key in the Google Cloud console by setting up appropriate HTTP referrer restrictions.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  3. 3

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing the exact server version can help attackers find known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: To hide server version, modify server config: server_tokens off; or use a reverse proxy.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be modified to run harmful code without integrity checks.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity for scripts or use a Content-Security-Policy that restricts sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Public listing of paths like /wp-admin/ and /wp-login.php exposes them to potential attackers.

    Fix: Ensure these paths have appropriate access control mechanisms in place beyond relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/hours-location/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/our-eye-doctors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/vision-therapy-optometrist/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/vision-therapy-optometrist/vision-therapy-can-improve-reading-skills-… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/vision-therapy-optometrist/who-is-a-candidate-for-vision-therapy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/vision-therapy-optometrist/vision-therapy-for-dyslexia-add-adhd-learn… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/vision-therapy-optometrist/vision-therapy-for-convergence-insufficien… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/vision-therapy-optometrist/children-vision-assessment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/myopia-management-optometrist/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/myopia-management-optometrist/is-your-child-a-candidate-for-myopia-ma… → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: nginx/1.26.3 (561 responses)
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…uY (39 chars) in https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/hours-location/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googleadservices.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 361 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 361 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 361 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    173 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.lifetime-eyecare.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.lifetime-eyecare.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.lifetime-eyecare.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.lifetime-eyecare.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.