Scanned sites / www.lifetime-eyecare.ca / 2026-09-11-1806

www.lifetime-eyecare.ca scan from 2026-09-11 18:06:41 UTC DR 3

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.lifetime-eyecare.ca.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-1806

Scanned 2026-09-11 18:06:41 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 18:31:34 UTC

Site: https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

87/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 421 pages and 140 assets of www.lifetime-eyecare.ca, starting from https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/. It scored 87 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by sitemap coverage (204), title tags (98), meta descriptions (119); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to sitemap coverage (−3.4), title tags (−2.7), meta descriptions (−2.6). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
421
Assets fetched
140
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

561 of 561 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 151 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags98 issues
    98 of 285 pages have title issues. 76 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • Meta descriptions119 issues
    119 of 285 pages have meta description issues. 76 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.6 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 285 pages have heading issues. 76 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites8 issues
    8 destinations answered with an error, 85 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 149 destinations checked.
    −0.9 points
  • Redirects60 issues
    64 redirecting URLs, 13 of them chained.
    −0.7 points
  • Non-200 responses64 noted
    64 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 60 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability11 issues
    11 of 302 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 59 pages noindex by design.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt text71 issues
    71 of 2914 image references have no alt attribute. 1 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.1 points
  • Heavy assets4 issues
    4 assets larger than 500 KB among 140 fetched assets.
    −2.4 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage204 issues
    1 sitemap listing 81 URLs: 204 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.4 points
  • Internal link counts67 noted
    Internal link counts for 361 pages; 67 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 285 pages have fewer than 200 words. 76 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format106 noted
    106 of 421 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals19 noted
    19 of 361 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives247 noted
    247 pages carry a robots directive; 114 carry none.
  • Anchor text175 noted
    175 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure22 noted
    22 of 285 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 76 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length3 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 3 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s2 noted
    2 pages answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 561 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 361 pages; 226 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 77 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2325 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.lifetime-eyecare.ca scores 87%, higher than 80% of the 2325 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 76 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites87% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has a few areas needing attention to enhance SEO. Key issues include redirects, title tags, meta descriptions, and indexability warnings. Addressing these will improve overall performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Reducing chained redirects improves load speed and accessibility.

    How: Update URLs to point directly to the final version and eliminate chained redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Fixing non-2xx responses ensures users can reach your content.

    How: Identify and correct pages returning 301 status or any errors; ensure they return a valid 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Shorter title tags enhance search visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Edit title tags to keep them under 60 characters while maintaining clarity.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Revise Meta Descriptions

    Why: Concise meta descriptions support better indexing and user engagement.

    How: Shorten meta descriptions to 160 characters without losing critical information.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: Proper headings improve content structure and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 and appropriate H2s to organize content.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Inclusion in the sitemap helps search engines discover your content.

    How: Add missing URLs to your sitemap for better indexing.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks critical security measures such as HTTP Strict Transport Security, exposing it to man-in-the-middle attacks. Additionally, server information is disclosed, and sensitive credentials were found. These issues need addressing to strengthen site security.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted during the first request if they type the website address without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload to all responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An API key in the page code can be exploited if not restricted properly, allowing unintended access to Google services.

    Fix: Restrict the API key usage by referrer in the Google Cloud console and avoid including sensitive keys in the source code.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  3. 3

    Exposed Server Version InformationLow

    Why it matters: Revealing the server version aids attackers in finding vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Hide the server version or set a generic server name. For nginx, use: server_tokens off; in the configuration.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  4. 4

    Lack of Subresource Integrity for Third-Party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Without Subresource Integrity, a compromise of third-party scripts could alter site behavior.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for third-party scripts or use a Content-Security-Policy that limits sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file reveals private paths, which could assist attackers in probing the site.

    Fix: Ensure sensitive paths like /wp-admin/ and /wp-login.php are secured with proper access controls.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/hours-location/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/our-eye-doctors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/vision-therapy-optometrist/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/vision-therapy-optometrist/vision-therapy-can-improve-reading-skills-… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/vision-therapy-optometrist/who-is-a-candidate-for-vision-therapy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/vision-therapy-optometrist/vision-therapy-for-dyslexia-add-adhd-learn… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/vision-therapy-optometrist/vision-therapy-for-convergence-insufficien… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/vision-therapy-optometrist/children-vision-assessment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/myopia-management-optometrist/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/eye-care-services/myopia-management-optometrist/is-your-child-a-candidate-for-myopia-ma… → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: nginx/1.26.3 (561 responses)
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…uY (39 chars) in https://www.lifetime-eyecare.ca/hours-location/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googleadservices.com (40 script tags)
    • ecpbuilder.com (9 script tags)
    • www.google.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 361 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 361 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 361 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    173 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.lifetime-eyecare.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.lifetime-eyecare.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.lifetime-eyecare.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.lifetime-eyecare.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.