Scanned sites / www.jslawmt.com / 2026-10-05-1054

www.jslawmt.com scan from 10/5/2026, 10:54:32 AM

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.jslawmt.com.

Scan 2026-10-05-1054

Scanned 10/5/2026, 10:54:32 AM, finished 10/5/2026, 11:07:54 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.jslawmt.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

75/ 100Good

On October 5, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 196 pages and 349 assets of www.jslawmt.com, starting from https://www.jslawmt.com/. It scored 75 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 22 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (154), heavy assets (40), meta descriptions (127); 2 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−8.3), heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−5.5). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 1 check was not run because the crawl fetched nothing for it. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
196
Assets fetched
349
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 22
CoverageComplete crawl

545 of 546 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 220 link destinations on other sites have not been checked.

  • Title tags154 issues
    154 of 168 pages have title issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −8.3 points
  • Meta descriptions127 issues
    127 of 168 pages have meta description issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.5 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 168 pages have heading issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links2 issues
    2 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sitesNot checked
    Not checked: the crawl fetched nothing this check can look at.
  • Redirects10 issues
    10 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    14 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 11 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability13 issues
    13 of 185 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.7 points
  • Image alt text391 issues
    391 of 697 image references have no alt attribute.
    −3.4 points
  • Heavy assets40 issues
    40 assets larger than 500 KB among 349 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages7 issues
    7 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage14 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 159 URLs: 7 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 7 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.5 points
  • Internal link counts70 noted
    Internal link counts for 185 pages; 70 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 168 pages have fewer than 200 words. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content2 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format9 noted
    9 of 196 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals17 noted
    17 of 185 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives185 noted
    185 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text21 noted
    21 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure43 noted
    43 of 168 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length98 noted
    98 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2077 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.jslawmt.com scores 75%, higher than 31% of the 2077 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0531050%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 1 site42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 3 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 9 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 7 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 10 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 6 sites60%: 12 sites61%: 10 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 22 sites64%: 15 sites65%: 38 sites66%: 27 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 33 sites70%: 35 sites71%: 63 sites72%: 69 sites73%: 52 sites74%: 59 sites75%: 77 sites76%: 79 sites77%: 93 sites78%: 90 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 97 sites81%: 103 sites82%: 105 sites83%: 90 sites84%: 91 sites85%: 67 sites86%: 66 sites87%: 63 sites88%: 63 sites89%: 51 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 43 sites92%: 24 sites93%: 18 sites94%: 15 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 4 sites97%: 11 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 1 site100%: 57 sites75% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The crawl revealed opportunities for improvement, including fixing broken links, addressing redirects, and optimizing titles and meta descriptions. Implementing these changes will boost your site's performance and SEO.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 2 internal links point to non-existent pages, harming user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove links to the broken URLs found in the crawl.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: 10 URLs redirect, with one being a chain, which can slow down page loading.

    How: Identify and consolidate redirects; remove unnecessary chains for faster access.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 154 pages have title issues, affecting search visibility.

    How: Create unique and concise title tags for all relevant pages, ensuring titles are under 60 characters.

    Evidence: 8 pages share the title "Uncategorized - Montana Criminal Lawyers | Family Law & Per…", which usually means one template writes it for all of them.

    8 pages affected

    Depends on: If these pages really are the same content, the duplicate title is a symptom: canonicalise them to one URL instead.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 127 pages lack optimal meta descriptions, which are crucial for click-through rates.

    How: Write compelling meta descriptions for affected pages, adhering to recommended lengths.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Missing Headings

    Why: 2 pages lack H1 headings, which is essential for search engine indexing.

    How: Add appropriate H1 headings to the relevant pages to improve SEO.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Reduce Heavy Assets

    Why: Multiple assets exceed recommended sizes, which can slow down page loading.

    How: Compress or replace large images that appear across several pages.

    Evidence: 1.8 MB of image, loaded by 86 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    86 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website jslawmt.com lacks several important security measures that can expose it to potential risks. Key issues include missing protections against clickjacking and MIME sniffing, as well as not enforcing HTTPS. Addressing these findings will help improve overall site security and user trust.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HSTS HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted when accessing the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of X-Frame-Options allows pages to be framed, potentially leading to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Absence of X-Content-Type-Options may allow browsers to incorrectly interpret file types.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Not having a referrer policy can expose sensitive URL details when users navigate away.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  5. 5

    Mixed Content IssuesLow

    Why it matters: Loading resources over HTTP on HTTPS pages can compromise security by allowing interception.

    Fix: Update all resource links to HTTPS.

    Evidence: Mixed content

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: A permissions policy can limit browser features that could be misused by injected scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(none), microphone=(none), camera=(none).

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.jslawmt.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/dui-defense/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/expungement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/drug-possession/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/conditional-probation-discharge/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/offender-registration-removal/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/child-custody/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/child-support/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/divorce/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.jslawmt.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/dui-defense/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/expungement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/drug-possession/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/conditional-probation-discharge/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/offender-registration-removal/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/child-custody/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/child-support/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/divorce/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.jslawmt.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/dui-defense/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/expungement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/drug-possession/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/conditional-probation-discharge/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/offender-registration-removal/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/child-custody/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/child-support/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/divorce/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.jslawmt.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/about-us/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/dui-defense/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/expungement/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/drug-possession/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/conditional-probation-discharge/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/offender-registration-removal/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/child-custody/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/child-support/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/divorce/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.jslawmt.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/about-us/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/dui-defense/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/expungement/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/drug-possession/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/conditional-probation-discharge/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/offender-registration-removal/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/child-custody/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/child-support/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/divorce/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    157 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://www.jslawmt.com/ loads image http://www.jslawmt.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/banner.png
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/about-us/ loads image http://www.jslawmt.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/about-banner-1.jpg
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/about-us/ loads image http://www.jslawmt.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/About-Us-Right-Image.png.webp
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/ loads image http://www.judnichlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Criminal-Defense-Attorney-Banner.png
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/dui-defense/ loads image http://www.jslawmt.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Dui-Defense-Banner.png
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/drug-possession/ loads image http://www.judnichlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Drug-Charge-Lawyers-Banner.png
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/conditional-proba… loads image http://www.judnichlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Conditional-Probation-Dischargev-Ban…
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/offender-registra… loads image http://www.judnichlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Sex-Offender-Registry.png
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/ loads image http://www.judnichlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Family-Law-Banner.png
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/ loads image http://www.jslawmt.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Depositphotos_410595726_L.jpg.webp
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/child-custody/ loads image http://www.jslawmt.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Child-Custody-Attorney-Banner.png
    • https://www.jslawmt.com/practice-areas/family-law/child-support/ loads image http://www.judnichlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Child-Support-Attorney-Banner.png
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (545 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (202 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.calltrk.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (16 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 185 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.jslawmt.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.jslawmt.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.jslawmt.com?

www.jslawmt.com scan 2026-10-05-1054 | DIY SEO Hub