Scanned sites / u-msc.com

SEO report for u-msc.com DR 14

The latest Site Spider scan of u-msc.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/u--msc-com/2026-09-09-1531.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-09 15:31:59 UTC, finished 2026-09-09 15:41:29 UTC

Site: https://u-msc.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

77/ 100Good

On September 9, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 198 pages and 681 assets of u-msc.com, starting from https://u-msc.com/. It scored 77 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (40), links to other sites (15), sitemap coverage (84); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), links to other sites (−3.5), sitemap coverage (−3). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
198
Assets fetched
681
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

879 of 881 discovered URLs were fetched, 4 left out by the 200-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 165 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags31 issues
    31 of 65 pages have title issues. 103 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.8 points
  • Meta descriptions39 issues
    39 of 65 pages have meta description issues. 103 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.9 points
  • Headings10 issues
    10 of 65 pages have heading issues. 103 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Broken links23 issues
    29 internal links point at 23 broken URLs.
    −2.7 points
  • Links to other sites15 issues
    15 destinations answered with an error, 86 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 165 destinations checked.
    −3.5 points
  • Redirects4 issues
    5 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses25 issues
    31 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 30 of them are pages, 25 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −1.5 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability39 issues
    39 of 104 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 64 pages noindex by design.
    −2.3 points
  • Image alt text65 issues
    65 of 1459 image references have no alt attribute. 152 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.3 points
  • Heavy assets40 issues
    40 assets larger than 500 KB among 681 fetched assets. 12 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage84 issues
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://u-msc.com/sitemap.xml (404). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3 points
  • Internal link counts94 noted
    Internal link counts for 168 pages; 94 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 65 pages have fewer than 200 words. 103 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format88 noted
    88 of 198 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals103 noted
    103 of 168 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives168 noted
    168 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text104 noted
    104 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure56 noted
    56 of 65 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 103 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length29 noted
    29 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 168 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 879 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 168 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 82 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2314 sites, median 79%, average 78%

u-msc.com scores 77%, higher than 38% of the 2314 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 70 sites75%: 70 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 98 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 60 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 37 sites93%: 23 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites77% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has some technical issues impacting SEO. Focus on fixing broken links, non-200 responses, and optimizing title tags. Implementing a sitemap will also improve your indexability.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Reducing broken links enhances user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove the 29 internal links pointing to 23 broken URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: This impacts user access and search engine indexing.

    How: Address the 31 URLs that returned non-200 responses, by correcting or removing them.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improving titles can increase click-through rates (CTR) and clarity.

    How: Revise 30 pages with title issues, ensuring they are unique and within recommended length.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add a Sitemap

    Why: Sitemaps help search engines discover your new and updated pages.

    How: Create a sitemap.xml and list it in robots.txt to avoid the 404 error.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Boosting descriptions can improve visibility in search results.

    How: Create and optimize meta descriptions for 39 pages that are missing or problematic.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Proper heading structure improves SEO and content hierarchy.

    How: Adjust heading tags on 10 pages to ensure each page has a single H1 tag.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website u-msc.com lacks essential security headers, making it vulnerable to various attacks. Key issues include missing protections against interception, clickjacking, and potential exploitation of vulnerable libraries. Immediate attention to these issues is necessary to enhance site security.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: No HSTS header can allow interception of users' initial requests.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP leaves the site vulnerable to cross-site scripting attacks.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header risks clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or SAMEORIGIN

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 2.7.11 has vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: This enables browsers to incorrectly interpret file types.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.u-msc.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.u-msc.com/club-info/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.u-msc.com/club-staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.u-msc.com/umsc-constitution/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.u-msc.com/board-of-directors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.u-msc.com/volunteers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.u-msc.com/referee-information/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.u-msc.com/club-calendar/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.u-msc.com/alumni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.u-msc.com/umsc-featured-news/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.u-msc.com/programs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.u-msc.com/programs/jr-academy/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 168 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.u-msc.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.u-msc.com/club-info/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.u-msc.com/club-staff/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.u-msc.com/umsc-constitution/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.u-msc.com/board-of-directors/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.u-msc.com/volunteers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.u-msc.com/referee-information/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.u-msc.com/club-calendar/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.u-msc.com/alumni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.u-msc.com/umsc-featured-news/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.u-msc.com/programs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.u-msc.com/programs/jr-academy/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.u-msc.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/club-info/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/club-staff/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/umsc-constitution/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/board-of-directors/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/volunteers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/referee-information/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/club-calendar/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/alumni/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/umsc-featured-news/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/programs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/programs/jr-academy/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.u-msc.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/club-info/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/club-staff/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/umsc-constitution/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/board-of-directors/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/volunteers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/referee-information/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/club-calendar/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/alumni/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/umsc-featured-news/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/programs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.u-msc.com/programs/jr-academy/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.7.11. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.7.11 in https://www.u-msc.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery.mi…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 168 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    82 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of u-msc.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near u-msc.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling u-msc.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own u-msc.com?