Scanned sites / www.idahostreetdental.com / 2026-09-13-0607

www.idahostreetdental.com scan from 2026-09-13 06:07:08 UTC DR 1

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.idahostreetdental.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0607

Scanned 2026-09-13 06:07:08 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 10:13:56 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.idahostreetdental.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

74/ 100Needs work

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 133 pages and 659 assets of www.idahostreetdental.com, starting from https://www.idahostreetdental.com/. It scored 74 out of 100, a result that needs work. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (15), meta descriptions (92), thin content (90); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−5.6), thin content (−5.5). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
133
Assets fetched
659
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

792 of 798 discovered URLs were fetched, 6 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 5 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags33 issues
    33 of 94 pages have title issues. 38 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.5 points
  • Meta descriptions92 issues
    92 of 94 pages have meta description issues. 38 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.6 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 94 pages have heading issues. 38 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites286 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 4 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 5 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses3 noted
    3 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 94 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 38 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 590 image references have no alt attribute. 59 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets15 issues
    15 assets larger than 500 KB among 659 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages88 issues
    88 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −2.7 points
  • Sitemap coverage88 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 94 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 88 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −4 points
  • Internal link counts38 noted
    Internal link counts for 132 pages; 38 worth a look.
  • Thin content90 issues
    90 of 94 pages have fewer than 200 words. 38 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.5 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format55 noted
    55 of 133 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals37 noted
    37 of 132 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives132 noted
    132 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure53 noted
    53 of 94 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 38 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length16 noted
    16 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 132 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 792 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 132 pages; 123 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 56 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2479 sites, median 80%, average 78%

www.idahostreetdental.com scores 74%, higher than 28% of the 2479 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591170%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 6 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 36 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 72 sites73%: 73 sites74%: 72 sites75%: 75 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 98 sites78%: 112 sites79%: 97 sites80%: 117 sites81%: 110 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 112 sites84%: 114 sites85%: 94 sites86%: 76 sites87%: 82 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 44 sites91%: 52 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites74% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has several SEO issues that need fixing to improve visibility. Focus on correcting redirects, non-200 status codes, title tags, and meta descriptions for the best results.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: One redirect may confuse search engines.

    How: Remove the redirect for https://www.idahostreetdental.com/login and direct to appropriate URL directly.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 3 URLs return non-200 responses affecting user experience.

    How: Fix or remove URLs https://www.idahostreetdental.com/wp-content/themes/bridge/css/img/box_image_shadow.png and https://www.idahostreetdental.com/wp-content/themes/bridge/images/prettyPhoto/facebook/default_thumbnail.gif (404 errors).

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 33 pages have title tag issues; improving them can enhance relevance.

    How: Revise titles for affected pages, ensuring they are unique and exceed 30 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Fix Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: 92 pages lack meta descriptions, affecting click-through rates.

    How: Add unique, relevant meta descriptions to each page, targeting keywords.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: Multiple H1s can confuse search engines regarding page structure.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 heading that accurately describes its content.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: 88 orphan pages lack internal links, limiting visibility.

    How: Add internal links from relevant pages to each orphan page to increase discoverability.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several areas for improvement regarding security, particularly in header configurations which protect against clickjacking and MIME type sniffing, and a credential exposure. These findings should be addressed to enhance the site's security posture overall.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, pages can be embedded in frames by malicious sites, risking user clickjacking.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' in response headers to prevent this threat.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  2. 2

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed Google API key can be exploited without proper restrictions, potentially leading to unauthorized use.

    Fix: Restrict the API key in the Google Cloud console to allow requests only from your website's domain.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  3. 3

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: This header prevents browsers from interpreting files as a different MIME type, which could lead to security issues.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' in response headers to enforce proper MIME type.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Using scripts from other domains without integrity checks increases the risk of script tampering.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) or a Content-Security-Policy to limit trusted sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Listing sensitive paths publicly may lead unauthorized users to those areas as there's no actual access control in place.

    Fix: Consider restricting access to sensitive areas with proper authentication rather than relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    37 of 132 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/about → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/services → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/testimonials → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/contact → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/privacy-policy → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/about/liz → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/about/20250729_132816 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/about/katie-headshots → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/about/cherie-photo → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/about/darnee → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/about/teri → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/about → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/services → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/testimonials → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/contact → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/privacy-policy → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/about/liz → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/about/20250729_132816 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/about/katie-headshots → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/about/cherie-photo → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/about/darnee → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahostreetdental.com/about/teri → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…4c (39 chars) in https://www.idahostreetdental.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
    • www.doctible.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 132 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 132 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 37 of 132 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    42 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.idahostreetdental.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.idahostreetdental.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.idahostreetdental.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.idahostreetdental.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.