Scanned sites / salonfront.ca

SEO report for salonfront.ca DR 1

The latest Site Spider scan of salonfront.ca, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/salonfront-ca/2026-11-01-1216.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-11-01 12:16:32 UTC, finished 2026-11-01 12:21:00 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://salonfront.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

74/ 100Needs work

On November 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 14 pages and 128 assets of salonfront.ca, starting from https://salonfront.ca/. It scored 74 out of 100, a result that needs work. 7 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (12), meta descriptions (12), headings (12); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−8.6), meta descriptions (−6.9), headings (−5.1). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
14
Assets fetched
128
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

142 of 142 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 26 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags12 issues
    12 of 12 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −8.6 points
  • Meta descriptions12 issues
    12 of 12 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.9 points
  • Headings12 issues
    12 of 12 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites18 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 6 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 26 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 12 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 22 image references have no alt attribute. 9 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 128 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage1 issue
    2 sitemaps listing 12 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.4 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 14 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin content5 issues
    5 of 12 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.9 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 14 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 14 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives14 noted
    14 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure8 noted
    8 of 12 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length6 noted
    6 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 14 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    12 of 12 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (12), ListItem (12), WebSite (12), WebPage (12), ImageObject (1). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 9 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 14 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions10 noted
    10 of 11 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookies1 noted
    1 cookie set by the site, 1 missing a protective flag; 14 response headers recorded across 142 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 14 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling4 noted
    4 words an English dictionary does not know, on 5 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2478 sites, median 80%, average 78%

salonfront.ca scores 74%, higher than 28% of the 2478 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591170%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 6 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 36 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 72 sites73%: 73 sites74%: 72 sites75%: 75 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 98 sites78%: 112 sites79%: 97 sites80%: 117 sites81%: 110 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 112 sites84%: 114 sites85%: 94 sites86%: 76 sites87%: 81 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 44 sites91%: 52 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites74% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has several issues affecting SEO performance. Focus on optimizing title tags, meta descriptions, and headings for improved visibility. Addressing heavy assets will enhance load speed, benefiting user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tags

    Why: Improving title tags will enhance search engine visibility.

    How: Revise titles to be descriptive and under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Update Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions impact click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create engaging meta descriptions under 160 characters for all pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Resolve Heading Issues

    Why: Proper headings improve content structure and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 and only one. Adjust the others accordingly.

    Checks: headings

  4. 4

    Shrink Heavy Assets

    Why: Reducing asset sizes enhances site load speed and user experience.

    How: Optimize or compress large images and scripts identified.

    Evidence: 509 KB of image, loaded by 2 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    2 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  5. 5

    Address Orphan Page

    Why: Linking to orphan pages improves SEO and user navigation.

    How: Add internal links to the login page from relevant sections.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Increase Page Content

    Why: More content can improve SEO ranking and user engagement.

    How: Enhance thin content pages by adding relevant information.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website salonfront.ca has several security weaknesses, including the absence of critical HTTP headers that protect against common vulnerabilities. These include lacking HTTP Strict Transport Security and protection against clickjacking. Moreover, cookies lack protective attributes, and there's a risk associated with third-party scripts.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted if they connect using HTTP instead of HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: No X-Frame-Options prevents the site from defending against clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Cookies Lack Protective FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Without HttpOnly, Secure, and SameSite flags, cookies are vulnerable to theft and misuse.

    Fix: Set the cookie wordpress_test_cookie with flags: HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite=Lax

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might misinterpret file types, leading to potential security risks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Lacking Subresource Integrity means compromised scripts from other domains could affect site functionality.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity where possible, or set a strong Content Security Policy that limits these scripts' sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Lacking this header leaves browser features vulnerable, allowing potential exploitation of injected scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), microphone=(self), camera=(self)

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://salonfront.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://salonfront.ca/about → no strict-transport-security
    • https://salonfront.ca/stylists → no strict-transport-security
    • https://salonfront.ca/sarah → no strict-transport-security
    • https://salonfront.ca/melissa-2 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://salonfront.ca/kylie → no strict-transport-security
    • https://salonfront.ca/verna → no strict-transport-security
    • https://salonfront.ca/travis → no strict-transport-security
    • https://salonfront.ca/menu → no strict-transport-security
    • https://salonfront.ca/social-media → no strict-transport-security
    • https://salonfront.ca/contact → no strict-transport-security
    • https://salonfront.ca/login → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 14 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://salonfront.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/about → no x-frame-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/stylists → no x-frame-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/sarah → no x-frame-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/melissa-2 → no x-frame-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/kylie → no x-frame-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/verna → no x-frame-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/travis → no x-frame-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/menu → no x-frame-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/social-media → no x-frame-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/contact → no x-frame-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/login → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://salonfront.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/about → no x-content-type-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/stylists → no x-content-type-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/sarah → no x-content-type-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/melissa-2 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/kylie → no x-content-type-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/verna → no x-content-type-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/travis → no x-content-type-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/menu → no x-content-type-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/social-media → no x-content-type-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/contact → no x-content-type-options
    • https://salonfront.ca/login → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://salonfront.ca/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://salonfront.ca/about → no permissions-policy
    • https://salonfront.ca/stylists → no permissions-policy
    • https://salonfront.ca/sarah → no permissions-policy
    • https://salonfront.ca/melissa-2 → no permissions-policy
    • https://salonfront.ca/kylie → no permissions-policy
    • https://salonfront.ca/verna → no permissions-policy
    • https://salonfront.ca/travis → no permissions-policy
    • https://salonfront.ca/menu → no permissions-policy
    • https://salonfront.ca/social-media → no permissions-policy
    • https://salonfront.ca/contact → no permissions-policy
    • https://salonfront.ca/login → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    1 of 1 cookie are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • wordpress_test_cookie (set by https://salonfront.ca/wp-login.php?action=lostpassword) lacks SameSite
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • app.aminos.ai (12 script tags)
10 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 14 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 14 pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    A referrer policy is set through a <meta name="referrer"> tag.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    4 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of salonfront.ca

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near salonfront.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling salonfront.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own salonfront.ca?