Scanned sites / www.fargoeyecare.com / 2026-11-02-1611

www.fargoeyecare.com scan from 2026-11-02 16:11:47 UTC DR 3

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-02-1611

Scanned 2026-11-02 16:11:47 UTC, finished 2026-11-02 16:24:37 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.fargoeyecare.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

91/ 100Excellent

On November 2, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 226 pages and 67 assets of www.fargoeyecare.com, starting from https://www.fargoeyecare.com/. It scored 91 out of 100, an excellent result. 8 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (54), meta descriptions (51), heavy assets (3); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−2.7), meta descriptions (−2), heavy assets (−1.8). 14 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 3 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
226
Assets fetched
67
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

293 of 293 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 16 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags54 issues
    54 of 78 pages have title issues. 123 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • Meta descriptions51 issues
    51 of 78 pages have meta description issues. 123 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 78 pages have heading issues. 123 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links3 issues
    203 internal links point at 3 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites442 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 8 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 16 destinations checked.
  • Redirects19 issues
    18 redirecting URLs, 5 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses7 issues
    29 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 25 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 78 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 123 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1107 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 67 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage54 issues
    1 sitemap listing 24 URLs: 54 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.6 points
  • Internal link counts123 noted
    Internal link counts for 201 pages; 123 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 78 pages have fewer than 200 words. 123 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format16 noted
    16 of 226 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 201 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives193 noted
    193 pages carry a robots directive; 8 carry none.
  • Anchor text127 noted
    127 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure57 noted
    57 of 78 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 123 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length2 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 2 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies8 noted
    8 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validation201 noted
    201 of 201 pages have HTML problems: 201 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    201 of 78 indexable pages carry structured data: WebPage (201), Organization (201), http://data-vocabulary.org/MedicalClinic (201), http://data-vocabulary.org/Address (201), GeoCoordinates (201). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates2 noted
    2 pages in 1 group read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404s1 noted
    1 page answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions4 noted
    4 of 78 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 293 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 201 pages; 135 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling22 noted
    22 words an English dictionary does not know, on 19 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2608 sites, median 80%, average 78%

www.fargoeyecare.com scores 91%, higher than 90% of the 2608 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0601190%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 5 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 5 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 15 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 20 sites65%: 30 sites66%: 40 sites67%: 39 sites68%: 37 sites69%: 48 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 74 sites72%: 73 sites73%: 77 sites74%: 76 sites75%: 84 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 106 sites78%: 117 sites79%: 106 sites80%: 119 sites81%: 115 sites82%: 118 sites83%: 117 sites84%: 119 sites85%: 97 sites86%: 87 sites87%: 85 sites88%: 70 sites89%: 71 sites90%: 46 sites91%: 57 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 16 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites91% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The site has a health score of 91/100, indicating good performance. However, 203 broken links and 54 missing meta descriptions need addressing for improved user experience and SEO. Focus on fixing broken links first.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: There are 203 broken links affecting site navigation and user experience.

    How: Update or remove links pointing to broken URLs, especially those linking to the sitemap.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Repair Redirects

    Why: 18 URLs redirect, with 5 being chained, which can dilute link equity and slow page speed.

    How: Simplify redirects to direct URLs without chains where possible.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 29 URLs returned non-200 responses, which can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Ensure all important pages return a 200 status and fix any errors or redirect issues.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Add Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: 51 pages have meta description issues, impacting click-through rates.

    How: Create compelling meta descriptions for the 34 pages listed without them.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Optimize Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 54 crawled pages are missing from the sitemap, limiting their visibility to search engines.

    How: Update your sitemap to include all relevant URLs.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Address Title Tag Issues

    Why: 54 pages have title issues, affecting search relevance.

    How: Revise titles to ensure they are descriptive and within the optimal length.

    Checks: titles

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

This review identifies potential security issues on your website. Key concerns include the absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security, which may expose visitors to interception risks, and a leaked Google API key that could be misused. Strengthening these areas will help protect your site and user data.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 3 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Not implementing HSTS allows interception of initial requests when HTTPS is not explicitly used.

    Fix: Add the following header: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload`.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: Exposing an API key in the code could allow unauthorized access or abuse of the Google API services.

    Fix: Restrict the API key by setting HTTP referrer restrictions in the Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  3. 3

    Absence of Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a Referrer Policy, the full URLs including query strings are exposed to third-party sites.

    Fix: Implement the header: `Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade`.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  4. 4

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing detailed server information can assist attackers in identifying vulnerabilities.

    Fix: To hide the server version, configure nginx to include `server_tokens off;`.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  5. 5

    Third-party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Using scripts from external domains without SRI increases the risk of script substitution.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for external scripts or establish a strict Content-Security-Policy.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: A missing Permissions-Policy could allow scripts to access sensitive browser features.

    Fix: Add the header: `Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()`.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  7. 7

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Publicly listing paths like /wp-admin/ and /wp-login.php could reveal sensitive areas of the site.

    Fix: Ensure proper access controls are in place for sensitive areas instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/location/eye-care-associates-fargo/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/location/eye-care-associates-fargo-2/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/contact-us/appointment-request-form/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/our-eye-care-clinic/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/eye-exams/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/optos-retinal-screening/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/eye-exams/pediatric-eye-exams/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/management-of-ocular-diseases/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/eye-emergencies-pinkred-eyes/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/location/eye-care-associates-fargo/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/location/eye-care-associates-fargo-2/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/contact-us/appointment-request-form/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/our-eye-care-clinic/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/eye-exams/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/optos-retinal-screening/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/eye-exams/pediatric-eye-exams/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/management-of-ocular-diseases/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/eye-emergencies-pinkred-eyes/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/location/eye-care-associates-fargo/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/location/eye-care-associates-fargo-2/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/contact-us/appointment-request-form/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/our-eye-care-clinic/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/eye-exams/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/optos-retinal-screening/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/eye-exams/pediatric-eye-exams/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/management-of-ocular-diseases/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/eye-emergencies-pinkred-eyes/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: nginx/1.26.3 (293 responses)
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…uY (39 chars) in https://www.fargoeyecare.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googleadservices.com (40 script tags)
    • ecpbuilder.com (28 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
8 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 201 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 201 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 201 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    77 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.fargoeyecare.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.fargoeyecare.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.fargoeyecare.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.fargoeyecare.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.