Scanned sites / sgvet.com

SEO report for sgvet.com DR 6

The latest Site Spider scan of sgvet.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/sgvet-com/2026-09-10-1336.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-10 13:36:13 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 17:53:57 UTC

Site: https://sgvet.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

92/ 100Excellent

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 33 pages and 277 assets of sgvet.com, starting from https://sgvet.com/. It scored 92 out of 100, an excellent result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (12), heavy assets (3), meta descriptions (2); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−4), heavy assets (−1.8), meta descriptions (−0.5). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
33
Assets fetched
277
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

310 of 311 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 19 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags12 issues
    12 of 30 pages have title issues.
    −4 points
  • Meta descriptions2 issues
    2 of 30 pages have meta description issues.
    −0.5 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 30 pages have heading issues.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 19 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects3 issues
    4 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses6 noted
    6 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 3 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 30 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 66 image references have no alt attribute. 1 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 277 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage2 issues
    2 sitemaps listing 30 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.4 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 30 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 30 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 33 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 30 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives30 noted
    30 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure3 noted
    3 of 30 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length3 noted
    3 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies3 noted
    3 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 30 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 310 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 30 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 56 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2316 sites, median 79%, average 78%

sgvet.com scores 92%, higher than 92% of the 2316 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 103 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites92% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has a few areas needing improvement, mainly in redirects, title tags, and handling of non-200 responses. Addressing these will enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Improper redirects can confuse both users and search engines.

    How: Remove unnecessary redirects, such as trailing slashes that don't change the content.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages returning non-200 responses harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify the URLs and ensure they return a 200 status or are corrected if they are broken.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Long titles can be cut off in search results, reducing click-through rates.

    How: Shorten title tags to under 60 characters while maintaining clarity.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Description

    Why: Meta descriptions affect search rankings and click rates.

    How: Expand the meta description to provide more context while keeping it under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Missing H1 Tags

    Why: H1 tags help search engines understand page content.

    How: Ensure each page, especially the consent form, has a unique H1 tag.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Internal Links for Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages are not indexed well and lack visibility.

    How: Add internal links to these pages from relevant existing content to improve visibility.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website lacks essential security measures, particularly a Content Security Policy that could prevent unauthorized script execution. Additionally, scripts from external sources do not have integrity checks. Sensitive paths in your robots.txt may unintentionally expose private areas. Address these issues promptly to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: No Content Security Policy header or meta tag is set, exposing the site to possible malicious script execution.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header, such as: 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' *.googletagmanager.com *.vetstoria.com *.birdeye.com *.greenhouse.io *.google.com;'

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Third-party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external sources could be compromised, affecting site security.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity for scripts or use a strict Content Security Policy that defines allowed sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Potentially Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The '/wp-admin/' path listed exposes a private directory structure to anyone reviewing robots.txt.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths through server-side controls instead of relying solely on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 30 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://sgvet.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sgvet.com/fargo-nd-veterinary-appointment/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sgvet.com/about-southgate-veterinary-hospital/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sgvet.com/veterinarian-fargo-nd/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sgvet.com/veterinarian-fargo-nd-reviews/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sgvet.com/southgate-veterinary-hospital-gallery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sgvet.com/fargo-nd-veterinary-jobs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sgvet.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sgvet.com/small-animal-care-fargo-nd/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sgvet.com/pet-owner-education-fargo-nd/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sgvet.com/pet-dental-care-fargo-nd/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sgvet.com/pet-lab-services-fargo-nd/ → no content-security-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (30 script tags)
    • us.vetstoria.com (30 script tags)
    • birdeye.com (1 script tag)
    • boards.greenhouse.io (31 script tags)
    • www.google.com (28 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 30 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    31 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of sgvet.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near sgvet.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling sgvet.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own sgvet.com?