Scanned sites / www.emeraldwest.net / 2026-09-13-1547

www.emeraldwest.net scan from 2026-09-13 15:47:38 UTC DR 5

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.emeraldwest.net.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-1547

Scanned 2026-09-13 15:47:38 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 15:57:22 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.emeraldwest.net/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

95/ 100Excellent

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 50 pages and 47 assets of www.emeraldwest.net, starting from https://www.emeraldwest.net/. It scored 95 out of 100, an excellent result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (11), sitemap coverage (7), title tags (3); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−2), sitemap coverage (−0.9), title tags (−0.7). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
50
Assets fetched
47
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

97 of 99 discovered URLs were fetched, 2 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 22 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags3 issues
    3 of 43 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Meta descriptions11 issues
    11 of 43 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 43 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.3 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites88 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 8 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    4 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    6 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 5 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 43 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.4 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 162 image references have no alt attribute. 5 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 47 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
  • Orphan pages3 issues
    3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage7 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 48 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.9 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 45 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 43 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 50 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 45 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives2 noted
    2 pages carry a robots directive; 43 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure37 noted
    37 of 43 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s2 noted
    2 pages answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 97 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 45 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 77 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2342 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.emeraldwest.net scores 95%, higher than 95% of the 2342 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 100 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites95% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Overall, your site has a strong health score with some minor SEO issues to resolve. Prioritize fixing redirects, improving titles and meta descriptions, addressing heading issues, linking orphan pages, and optimizing heavy assets.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can hinder user experience and crawl efficiency.

    How: Update the URLs that are redirecting to ensure they point to active pages directly.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Correct Title Tags

    Why: Title tags impact SEO and user engagement.

    How: Revise titles of the 3 pages with short tags to be more descriptive (50-60 characters).

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions influence click-through rates.

    How: Add missing meta descriptions to 4 identified pages, keeping them between 150-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Rectify Heading Issues

    Why: Headings affect content structure and SEO.

    How: Consolidate multiple H1 tags on the identified pages into one clear H1.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages lack visibility, impacting SEO.

    How: Create internal links from relevant pages to the 3 orphan pages identified.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down page load times.

    How: Compress or update the large 981 KB asset to improve load speed.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has important security vulnerabilities that need urgent attention. Key issues include lack of clickjacking protection, MIME sniffing protection, and risks from third-party scripts. Additionally, sensitive paths in your robots.txt could expose private information. Implementing the recommended fixes will significantly enhance your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, the site can be framed by malicious sites, leading to potential clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  2. 2

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Absence of X-Content-Type-Options may allow browsers to execute files as scripts based on their content rather than their declared type.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  3. 3

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains without Subresource Integrity may run compromised code, affecting site security.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity or define a Content-Security-Policy that restricts these domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  4. 4

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt exposes sensitive paths that could guide attackers to private areas of the site.

    Fix: Limit access to these paths with proper authentication mechanisms.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/about-us/meet-our-team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/dental-veneers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/teeth-whitening/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/dental-cleanings-exams/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/dental-sealants/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/digital-x-rays/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/emergency-care/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/about-us/meet-our-team/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/dental-veneers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/teeth-whitening/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/dental-cleanings-exams/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/dental-sealants/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/digital-x-rays/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/emergency-care/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • next-api.patientprism.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.rlets.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 3 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
8 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 45 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 45 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    80 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.emeraldwest.net

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.emeraldwest.net from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.emeraldwest.net?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.emeraldwest.net. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.