Scanned sites / www.emeraldwest.net / 2026-09-13-1547
www.emeraldwest.net scan from 2026-09-13 15:47:38 UTC DR 5
A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.emeraldwest.net.
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-09-13-1547
Scanned 2026-09-13 15:47:38 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 15:57:22 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results
Site: https://www.emeraldwest.net/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 50 pages and 47 assets of www.emeraldwest.net, starting from https://www.emeraldwest.net/. It scored 95 out of 100, an excellent result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (11), sitemap coverage (7), title tags (3); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−2), sitemap coverage (−0.9), title tags (−0.7). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium1 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 50
- Assets fetched
- 47
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 8 of 27
97 of 99 discovered URLs were fetched, 2 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 22 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags3 issues3 of 43 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−0.7 points
- Meta descriptions11 issues11 of 43 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−2 points
- Headings2 issues2 of 43 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−0.3 points
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sites88 noted0 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 8 destinations checked.
- Redirects1 issue4 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.−0.1 points
- Non-200 responses1 issue6 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 5 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.−0.2 points
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability2 issues2 of 43 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.−0.4 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 162 image references have no alt attribute. 5 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assetsOK0 assets larger than 500 KB among 47 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
- Orphan pages3 issues3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.−0.3 points
- Sitemap coverage7 issues5 sitemaps listing 48 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.−0.9 points
- Internal link counts2 notedInternal link counts for 45 pages; 2 worth a look.
- Thin contentOK0 of 43 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL format1 noted1 of 50 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- Canonicals1 noted1 of 45 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives2 noted2 pages carry a robots directive; 43 carry none.
- Anchor text1 noted1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure37 noted37 of 43 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt lengthOKNo image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomalies1 noted1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
- HTML and head validationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- hreflangNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Structured dataNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Near duplicatesNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Soft 404s2 noted2 pages answer 200 but say they are not there.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
- PaginationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 97 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 45 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed Insights5 notedMobile performance 77 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
- SpellingNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2342 sites, median 79%, average 78%
www.emeraldwest.net scores 95%, higher than 95% of the 2342 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsWritten from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.
Overall, your site has a strong health score with some minor SEO issues to resolve. Prioritize fixing redirects, improving titles and meta descriptions, addressing heading issues, linking orphan pages, and optimizing heavy assets.
- 1
Fix Redirects
Why: Redirects can hinder user experience and crawl efficiency.
How: Update the URLs that are redirecting to ensure they point to active pages directly.
Checks: redirects
- 2
Correct Title Tags
Why: Title tags impact SEO and user engagement.
How: Revise titles of the 3 pages with short tags to be more descriptive (50-60 characters).
Checks: titles
- 3
Enhance Meta Descriptions
Why: Meta descriptions influence click-through rates.
How: Add missing meta descriptions to 4 identified pages, keeping them between 150-160 characters.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 4
Rectify Heading Issues
Why: Headings affect content structure and SEO.
How: Consolidate multiple H1 tags on the identified pages into one clear H1.
Checks: headings
- 5
Link Orphan Pages
Why: Orphan pages lack visibility, impacting SEO.
How: Create internal links from relevant pages to the 3 orphan pages identified.
Checks: orphan-pages
- 6
Optimize Heavy Assets
Why: Large assets can slow down page load times.
How: Compress or update the large 981 KB asset to improve load speed.
Checks: heavy-assets
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlYour website has important security vulnerabilities that need urgent attention. Key issues include lack of clickjacking protection, MIME sniffing protection, and risks from third-party scripts. Additionally, sensitive paths in your robots.txt could expose private information. Implementing the recommended fixes will significantly enhance your site's security.
- 0 high
- 1 medium
- 2 low
- 1 info
- 1
Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium
Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, the site can be framed by malicious sites, leading to potential clickjacking attacks.
Fix: Add the header 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to all HTML responses.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 2
Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow
Why it matters: Absence of X-Content-Type-Options may allow browsers to execute files as scripts based on their content rather than their declared type.
Fix: Add the header 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to all HTML responses.
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 3
Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow
Why it matters: Scripts from external domains without Subresource Integrity may run compromised code, affecting site security.
Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity or define a Content-Security-Policy that restricts these domains.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
- 4
Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo
Why it matters: The robots.txt exposes sensitive paths that could guide attackers to private areas of the site.
Fix: Limit access to these paths with proper authentication mechanisms.
Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt
What the checks found
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/about-us/meet-our-team/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/dental-veneers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/teeth-whitening/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/dental-cleanings-exams/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/dental-sealants/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/digital-x-rays/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/emergency-care/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/about-us/meet-our-team/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/dental-veneers/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/teeth-whitening/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/dental-cleanings-exams/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/dental-sealants/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/digital-x-rays/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/emergency-care/ → no x-content-type-options
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- next-api.patientprism.com (40 script tags)
- cdn.rlets.com (40 script tags)
- www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 3 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-includes/
- Disallow: /wp-login.php
8 checks passed, 4 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 45 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKHTTP Strict Transport Security
strict-transport-security is set on all 45 HTML pages.
- OKContent Security Policy
A Content-Security-Policy is set.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
80 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- Not applicableReferrer policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicablePermissions policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableCookie flags
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries
No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near www.emeraldwest.net
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- www.forestlanedentalclinic.comDR 195/100 · rank 100 · 43 pages
- www.cooperroofing.caDR 795/100 · rank 100 · 46 pages
- joesroofing.caDR 095/100 · rank 100 · 33 pages
- www.petfoodie.czDR 095/100 · rank 100 · 32 pages
- www.nillesbuilders.comDR 095/100 · rank 100 · 66 pages
- mcglassonfarms.comDR 1395/100 · rank 100 · 12 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.emeraldwest.net from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.emeraldwest.net?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.emeraldwest.net. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.