Scanned sites / www.emeraldwest.net

SEO report for www.emeraldwest.net DR 5

The latest Site Spider scan of www.emeraldwest.net, with 3 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-emeraldwest-net/2026-10-01-0137.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-10-01 01:37:00 UTC, finished 2026-10-01 01:58:42 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.emeraldwest.net/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

95/ 100Excellent

On October 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 50 pages and 47 assets of www.emeraldwest.net, starting from https://www.emeraldwest.net/. It scored 95 out of 100, an excellent result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (11), sitemap coverage (7), title tags (3); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−2), sitemap coverage (−0.9), title tags (−0.7). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 2 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
50
Assets fetched
47
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

97 of 99 discovered URLs were fetched, 2 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 22 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags3 issues
    3 of 43 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Meta descriptions11 issues
    11 of 43 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 43 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.3 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites88 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 22 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    4 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    6 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 5 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 43 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.4 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 162 image references have no alt attribute. 5 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 47 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
  • Orphan pages3 issues
    3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage7 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 48 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.9 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 45 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 43 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 50 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 45 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives2 noted
    2 pages carry a robots directive; 43 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure37 noted
    37 of 43 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s2 noted
    2 pages answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 97 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 45 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights4 noted
    Mobile performance 85 on average across 5 pages; 4 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

What changed since the last scan

Score unchanged

www.emeraldwest.net scored 95 out of 100 in both of its last two scans. Across 3 scans on record the score has ended up where it started, at 95.

  1. 2026-09-13 15:47:38 UTC95/10050 pages
  2. 2026-09-14 02:12:55 UTC95/10050 pages
  3. 2026-10-01 01:37:00 UTC95/10050 pages

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2342 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.emeraldwest.net scores 95%, higher than 95% of the 2342 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 100 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites95% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis (rules v4). The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website health is excellent, but there are some significant areas needing attention to enhance search engine visibility. Prioritizing these will improve SEO performance remarkably.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: These URLs hinder accessibility and SEO performance.

    How: Update or remove the offending URLs to ensure they return a 2xx response.

    Checks: redirects, status-codes

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects in Sitemap

    Why: Redirects confuse search engines and may lose link equity.

    How: Correct the sitemap to list the final URLs instead of redirects.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  3. 3

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions improve click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create concise, keyword-rich meta descriptions for the affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Title tags are crucial for SEO and user engagement.

    How: Revise the three short title tags to better reflect page content.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Address Heading Structure

    Why: Proper heading structure helps with content hierarchy and SEO.

    How: Modify the H1 tags to ensure only one H1 per page.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Review Indexability Warnings

    Why: Pages marked as noindex should not appear in the sitemap.

    How: Decide on indexing for the two noindex pages and update the sitemap accordingly.

    Checks: indexability, sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your site lacks several important security headers, which could expose it to risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. It's advisable to add the missing headers to enhance protection and limit potential vulnerabilities.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 2 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this header allows pages to be embedded on other sites, increasing risk of clickjacking.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' or 'X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN' to your HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  2. 2

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly execute files based on their content instead of their declared MIME type.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to your HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  3. 3

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains without integrity checks can lead to malicious code execution if those domains are compromised.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for scripts from next-api.patientprism.com, cdn.rlets.com, and www.googletagmanager.com.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  4. 4

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Not having this header leaves open browser features, potentially allowing injected scripts more capabilities.

    Fix: Add 'Permissions-Policy: ' to your HTTP response headers, specifying features you do not allow.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Publicly listing sensitive paths does not restrict access and could assist malicious actors in probing the site.

    Fix: Ensure access controls are in place for /wp-admin/, /wp-includes/, and /wp-login.php instead of relying solely on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/about-us/meet-our-team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/dental-veneers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/teeth-whitening/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/dental-cleanings-exams/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/dental-sealants/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/digital-x-rays/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/emergency-care/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/about-us/meet-our-team/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/dental-veneers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/teeth-whitening/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/dental-cleanings-exams/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/dental-sealants/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/digital-x-rays/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/emergency-care/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/about-us/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/about-us/meet-our-team/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/dental-veneers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/cosmetic-dentistry/teeth-whitening/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/dental-cleanings-exams/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/dental-sealants/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/digital-x-rays/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.emeraldwest.net/our-services/general-family-dentistry/emergency-care/ → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • next-api.patientprism.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.rlets.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 3 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
9 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 45 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 45 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 45 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    80 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.emeraldwest.net

Sites scoring near www.emeraldwest.net

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.emeraldwest.net from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.emeraldwest.net?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.emeraldwest.net. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.