Scanned sites / www.elevatedestateplanning.law

SEO report for www.elevatedestateplanning.law DR 19

The latest Site Spider scan of www.elevatedestateplanning.law, with 2 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-elevatedestateplanning-law/2026-09-14-0242.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-14 02:42:42 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 03:08:47 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 153 pages and 541 assets of www.elevatedestateplanning.law, starting from https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (93), meta descriptions (93), heavy assets (8); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−6.1), meta descriptions (−4.9), heavy assets (−4.8). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
153
Assets fetched
541
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

694 of 696 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 73 left unchecked.

  • Title tags93 issues
    93 of 139 pages have title issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.1 points
  • Meta descriptions93 issues
    93 of 139 pages have meta description issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.9 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 139 pages have heading issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 92 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 73 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.3 points
  • Redirects1 issue
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses144 noted
    144 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 142 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 10 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text73 issues
    73 of 504 image references have no alt attribute. 73 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.9 points
  • Heavy assets8 issues
    8 assets larger than 500 KB among 541 fetched assets. 2 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −4.8 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage3 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 136 URLs: 3 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.1 points
  • Internal link counts17 noted
    Internal link counts for 152 pages; 17 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 139 pages have fewer than 200 words. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format10 noted
    10 of 153 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals13 noted
    13 of 152 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives152 noted
    152 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text9 noted
    9 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure39 noted
    39 of 139 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length18 noted
    15 images over 100 KB; 3 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 152 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 694 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 152 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 72 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

What changed since the last scan

+1 points

www.elevatedestateplanning.law gained 1 point since the previous scan, moving from 82 to 83 out of 100. 3 URLs the earlier crawl reached were not reached this time.

  • 3 URLs from the earlier crawl were not reached this time
  1. 2026-09-13 22:42:55 UTC82/100153 pages
  2. 2026-09-14 02:42:42 UTC83/100153 pages

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2345 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.elevatedestateplanning.law scores 83%, higher than 64% of the 2345 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 102 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a health score of 85, which is good. Key issues include non-200 responses, title and meta description problems, and missing blog pages in the sitemap. Addressing these will enhance SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 144 URLs are returning non-200 statuses, affecting accessibility.

    How: Identify the URLs causing issues (e.g., status 403) and resolve server settings or URL paths.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Shorten Title Tags

    Why: 93 pages have title issues; many are too long, potentially affecting SERP visibility.

    How: Revise titles to be under 60 characters for all affected pages.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Optimize Meta Descriptions

    Why: 63 pages have meta description issues, impacting click-through rates.

    How: Edit descriptions to be under 160 characters, ensuring they accurately reflect page content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Correct Multiple H1 Issues

    Why: 1 page has multiple H1 headings, which can confuse search engines.

    How: Change additional H1s to H2 or appropriate heading tags on the affected page.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Include Missing Blog Pages in Sitemap

    Why: 3 crawled blog pages are not listed in the sitemap, limiting their discoverability.

    How: Add the missing URLs to your sitemap and resubmit it to search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Review Heavy Assets

    Why: Large files can slow down page loading speed, affecting user experience and SEO.

    How: Compress or optimize files larger than 500 KB.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several crucial security headers missing, which could expose it to various attacks. Implementing these headers will enhance its security against threats like data interception and clickjacking. Additionally, an outdated jQuery library presents potential vulnerabilities that should be addressed.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted on initial connections using plain HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP leaves the site vulnerable to attacks from malicious scripts and frames.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: No X-Frame-Options means the site can be embedded in malicious iframes, risking clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Outdated jQuery LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 2.10.5 exposes your site to known vulnerabilities; exploitation depends on usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may misinterpret content types, leading to security issues.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/elevated-estate-planning/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/estate-planning-resources/register-for-webinar/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/our-attorneys/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/community-partners/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/spokane-estate-tax-lawyer/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/spokane-guardianship-lawyer/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/spokane-limited-liability-company-lawyer/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 152 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/elevated-estate-planning/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/estate-planning-resources/register-for-webinar/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/our-attorneys/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/community-partners/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/spokane-estate-tax-lawyer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/spokane-guardianship-lawyer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/spokane-limited-liability-company-lawyer/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/elevated-estate-planning/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/estate-planning-resources/register-for-webinar/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/our-attorneys/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/community-partners/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/careers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/spokane-estate-tax-lawyer/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/spokane-guardianship-lawyer/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/spokane-limited-liability-company-lawyer/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/elevated-estate-planning/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/estate-planning-resources/register-for-webinar/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/our-attorneys/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/community-partners/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/about-us/careers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/spokane-estate-tax-lawyer/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/spokane-guardianship-lawyer/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/spokane-limited-liability-company-lawyer/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.10.5. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.10.5 in https://www.elevatedestateplanning.law/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/place…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 6 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (6 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (6 script tags)
    • www.bugherd.com (3 script tags)
    • cdn.userway.org (3 script tags)
    • bzrcdn.openai.com (3 script tags)
    • cse.google.com (2 script tags)
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 152 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    43 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.elevatedestateplanning.law

Sites scoring near www.elevatedestateplanning.law

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.elevatedestateplanning.law from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.elevatedestateplanning.law?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.elevatedestateplanning.law. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.