Scanned sites / hendersonvision.com

SEO report for hendersonvision.com DR 13

The latest Site Spider scan of hendersonvision.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/hendersonvision-com/2026-09-14-0227.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-14 02:27:24 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 02:50:44 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://hendersonvision.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 177 pages and 307 assets of hendersonvision.com, starting from https://hendersonvision.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (21), links to other sites (16), meta descriptions (64); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), links to other sites (−4), meta descriptions (−3.8). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
177
Assets fetched
307
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

484 of 494 discovered URLs were fetched, 10 failed. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 301 link destinations on other sites were checked, 122 left unchecked.

  • Title tags22 issues
    22 of 92 pages have title issues. 42 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.6 points
  • Meta descriptions64 issues
    64 of 92 pages have meta description issues. 42 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.8 points
  • Headings5 issues
    5 of 92 pages have heading issues. 42 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites16 issues
    16 destinations answered with an error, 104 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 122 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −4 points
  • Redirects45 issues
    43 redirecting URLs, 11 of them chained.
    −1.3 points
  • Non-200 responses253 noted
    253 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 43 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 92 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 42 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 593 image references have no alt attribute. 220 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets21 issues
    21 assets larger than 500 KB among 307 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage1 issue
    1 sitemap listing 93 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link counts45 noted
    Internal link counts for 134 pages; 45 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 92 pages have fewer than 200 words. 42 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format9 noted
    9 of 177 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 134 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives134 noted
    134 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure31 noted
    31 of 92 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 42 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length53 noted
    53 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies15 noted
    15 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 134 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 16 response headers recorded across 484 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 134 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 47 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2345 sites, median 79%, average 78%

hendersonvision.com scores 83%, higher than 64% of the 2345 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 102 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has a good health score, but there are critical issues to address including redirects and title/meta description problems. Implement these changes to enhance your SEO visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 43 URLs are redirecting, 11 of which are chained, causing potential SEO issues.

    How: Identify and replace chained redirects with direct ones to improve load times and SEO.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 253 URLs have non-200 responses, which can impact user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify these URLs and either fix or remove them to ensure they return a 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Enhance Title Tags

    Why: 22 pages have title issues, leading to poor SEO optimization.

    How: Revise the titles to be descriptive and at least 30 characters long to comply with SEO standards.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 25 pages lack meta descriptions, which affects click-through rates in search results.

    How: Create and implement unique meta descriptions for each page to improve visibility.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: 5 pages have multiple H1s, causing confusion for search engines and users.

    How: Consolidate H1 headings to one per page while ensuring they are descriptive and relevant.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: 21 assets are larger than 500 KB, which can slow page load times.

    How: Compress and optimize images to reduce their size without losing quality for better performance.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review of hendersonvision.com found one medium-severity issue related to outdated libraries, along with some lower-priority notes regarding third-party scripts and sensitive paths in the robots.txt file. Addressing these findings will enhance the website's overall security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Outdated jQuery LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 1.9.1 has known vulnerabilities, including XSS and prototype pollution issues. Their exploits depend on site usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or higher to mitigate these vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  2. 2

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be modified, potentially compromising site security.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) where possible or use Content Security Policy (CSP) to restrict scripts' sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file discloses a private path, allowing easy discovery of potentially sensitive areas.

    Fix: Consider protecting sensitive paths with proper access controls rather than relying solely on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.9.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.9.1 in https://hendersonvision.com/wp-content/themes/understrap/js/theme.min.js?ver=2.…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • data.staticfiles.io (40 script tags)
    • unpkg.com (40 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 134 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 134 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 134 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 134 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    18 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of hendersonvision.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near hendersonvision.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling hendersonvision.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own hendersonvision.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming hendersonvision.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.