Scanned sites / www.drwylie.com / 2026-09-12-0201

www.drwylie.com scan from 2026-09-12 02:01:42 UTC DR 16

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.drwylie.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-0201

Scanned 2026-09-12 02:01:42 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 04:10:21 UTC

Site: https://www.drwylie.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

86/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 350 pages and 154 assets of www.drwylie.com, starting from https://www.drwylie.com/. It scored 86 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (131), sitemap coverage (197), meta descriptions (111); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−4.1), sitemap coverage (−3.7), meta descriptions (−2.7). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
350
Assets fetched
154
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

504 of 504 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 99 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags131 issues
    131 of 285 pages have title issues. 38 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.1 points
  • Meta descriptions111 issues
    111 of 285 pages have meta description issues. 38 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 285 pages have heading issues. 38 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites5 issues
    5 destinations answered with an error, 37 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 99 destinations checked.
    −0.6 points
  • Redirects28 issues
    31 redirecting URLs, 5 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses31 noted
    31 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 27 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability12 issues
    12 of 302 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 21 pages noindex by design.
    −0.4 points
  • Image alt text1 issue
    1 of 1842 image references have no alt attribute. 25 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets4 issues
    4 assets larger than 500 KB among 154 fetched assets.
    −2.4 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage197 issues
    1 sitemap listing 96 URLs: 193 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.7 points
  • Internal link counts29 noted
    Internal link counts for 323 pages; 29 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 285 pages have fewer than 200 words. 38 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format27 noted
    27 of 350 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals20 noted
    20 of 323 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives173 noted
    173 pages carry a robots directive; 150 carry none.
  • Anchor text116 noted
    116 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure27 noted
    27 of 285 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 38 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length4 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 4 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies4 noted
    4 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s2 noted
    2 pages answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 504 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 323 pages; 176 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 71 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2328 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.drwylie.com scores 86%, higher than 77% of the 2328 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 73 sites76%: 85 sites77%: 93 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites86% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has a good health score, but there are key SEO areas needing improvement: redirect chains, non-200 responses, title and meta description issues, and sitemap inaccuracies. Addressing these will enhance visibility and performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirect Chains

    Why: Chained redirects can confuse search engines and slow down site performance.

    How: Combine chained redirects into a single redirect from the original URL to the final destination.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: URLs not returning a 2xx status hinder user access and SEO rankings.

    How: Identify and fix or remove URLs returning 301 redirects.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: SEO best practices recommend title tags under 60 characters for better visibility.

    How: Edit titles to keep them concise, focusing on primary keywords.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions over 160 characters may be cut off in search results, impacting CTR.

    How: Revise meta descriptions to be clear and under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Update Sitemap for Coverage

    Why: Missing and redirecting URLs in the sitemap can lead to missed indexing opportunities.

    How: Ensure all important URLs are listed and correct any that are redirecting.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages are not linked internally, limiting their discoverability.

    How: Add internal links to the orphan page from relevant areas of your site.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has several security vulnerabilities that could expose users to risks, including the lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security and exposure of sensitive information like a Google API key. Addressing these issues is essential to improve overall website security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted when accessing the site via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains'.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: A visible Google API key could be exploited by attackers if not properly secured.

    Fix: Restrict the API key usage by specifying allowed HTTP referrers in the Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  3. 3

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 2.9.2 exposes the site to multiple known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade to jQuery 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing the server version can help attackers identify specific vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Configure the server to hide version information, e.g., 'server: nginx'.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  5. 5

    Mixed Content IssuesLow

    Why it matters: Loading resources over HTTP on HTTPS pages can create security risks.

    Fix: Change 'http://assets.markallengroup.com/article-images/image-library/147/patternglare4.jpg' to HTTPS.

    Evidence: Mixed content

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.drwylie.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.drwylie.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.drwylie.com/the-staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.drwylie.com/contact-us/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.drwylie.com/insurance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.drwylie.com/vision-therapy-optometrist/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.drwylie.com/vision-therapy-optometrist/vision-therapy-quiz/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.drwylie.com/vision-therapy-optometrist/why-a-functional-vision-exam-matters/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.drwylie.com/vision-therapy-optometrist/yoked-prisms-your-visual-system/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.drwylie.com/vision-therapy-optometrist/amblyopia/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.drwylie.com/vision-therapy-optometrist/add-adhd-and-vision-therapy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.drwylie.com/vision-therapy-optometrist/vision-problems-and-autism/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: nginx/1.26.3 (504 responses)
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    2 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://www.drwylie.com/vision-therapy-optometrist/vision-therapy-qui… loads image http://assets.markallengroup.com/article-images/image-library/147/patternglare4.jpg
    • https://www.drwylie.com/vision-therapy-optometrist/vision-therapy-qui… loads image http://assets.markallengroup.com/article-images/image-library/147/patternglare4.jpg
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.9.2. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.9.2 in https://www.drwylie.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery.…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…uY (39 chars) in https://www.drwylie.com/contact-us/testimonials/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googleadservices.com (40 script tags)
    • ecpbuilder.com (4 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 323 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 323 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 323 HTML pages.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    139 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.drwylie.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.drwylie.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.drwylie.com?