Scanned sites / www.archdentalfargo.com

SEO report for www.archdentalfargo.com DR 5

The latest Site Spider scan of www.archdentalfargo.com, with 2 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-archdentalfargo-com/2026-10-01-2251.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-10-01 22:51:53 UTC, finished 2026-10-02 00:22:30 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.archdentalfargo.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

86/ 100Good

On October 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 112 pages and 312 assets of www.archdentalfargo.com, starting from https://www.archdentalfargo.com/. It scored 86 out of 100, a good result. 6 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (10), links to other sites (17), indexability (14); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), links to other sites (−4), indexability (−1.4). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
112
Assets fetched
312
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
6 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

424 of 424 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 192 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags10 issues
    10 of 40 pages have title issues. 60 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1 points
  • Meta descriptions9 issues
    9 of 40 pages have meta description issues. 60 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 40 pages have heading issues. 60 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites17 issues
    17 destinations answered with an error, 99 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 192 destinations checked.
    −4 points
  • Redirects13 issues
    13 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.5 points
  • Non-200 responses13 noted
    13 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 12 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability14 issues
    14 of 57 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 43 pages noindex by design.
    −1.4 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 530 image references have no alt attribute. 21 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets10 issues
    10 assets larger than 500 KB among 312 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    5 sitemaps listing 40 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link counts49 noted
    Internal link counts for 100 pages; 49 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 40 pages have fewer than 200 words. 60 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format18 noted
    18 of 112 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals60 noted
    60 of 100 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives100 noted
    100 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text57 noted
    57 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure6 noted
    6 of 40 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 60 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length34 noted
    31 images over 100 KB; 3 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 100 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 17 response headers recorded across 424 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 100 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights4 noted
    Mobile performance 68 on average across 5 pages; 4 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

What changed since the last scan

Score unchanged

www.archdentalfargo.com scored 86 out of 100 in both of its last two scans. 38 URLs the earlier crawl reached were not reached this time.

  • 38 URLs from the earlier crawl were not reached this time
  1. 2026-09-13 11:47:34 UTC86/100112 pages
  2. 2026-10-01 22:51:53 UTC86/100112 pages

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2337 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.archdentalfargo.com scores 86%, higher than 77% of the 2337 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites86% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis (rules v4). The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site performs well overall, but there are critical issues with redirects, title tags, and meta descriptions. Addressing these will improve user experience and SEO effectiveness.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Reduce unnecessary redirect chains to improve page load speed and user experience.

    How: Identify and remove or optimize the chained redirects (e.g., check the URL structure).

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Shorten Title Tags

    Why: Long title tags may be cut off in search results, reducing click-through rates.

    How: Revise the 10 pages with titles over 60 characters to be concise yet descriptive.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing or long meta descriptions can affect search visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for the 9 pages listed with issues, keeping within 155-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Review Indexability Issues

    Why: Canonical tags pointing incorrectly can hinder proper indexing of pages.

    How: Check the 14 flagged pages and ensure canonical tags are correctly set to the intended primary page.

    Evidence: 5 pages flagged: Canonical points to https://www.archdentalfargo.com/blog/.

    5 pages affected

    Depends on: Confirm the pages really share a cause before changing them together.

    Checks: indexability

  5. 5

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down site performance and user experience.

    How: Shrink the listed large assets or consider hosting them externally to improve load times.

    Evidence: 694 KB of document, loaded by 100 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    100 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has important security vulnerabilities, including the lack of Clickjacking protection and exposure of a Google API key, which can enable potential attacks. Attention should be given to securing these areas immediately.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: No X-Frame-Options header is set, allowing the site to be framed by attackers.

    Fix: Add the header `X-Frame-Options: DENY` or use a CSP directive like `Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'none';`.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  2. 2

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: A Google API key is found in the code, which can be abused without proper referrer restrictions.

    Fix: Restrict the API key usage in the Google Cloud console by HTTP referrer to prevent unauthorized access.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  3. 3

    Lack of Subresource Integrity on Third-party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Four external scripts could be compromised, affecting site security and integrity.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity for each third-party script, or use a Content-Security-Policy that references each host.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  4. 4

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file reveals a path to the admin area that could be used by attackers.

    Fix: Consider restricting access to sensitive paths with proper authentication controls instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.archdentalfargo.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.archdentalfargo.com/about/dr-derek-harnish/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.archdentalfargo.com/about/dental-team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.archdentalfargo.com/about/our-philosophy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.archdentalfargo.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.archdentalfargo.com/fargo-dental-solutions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.archdentalfargo.com/fargo-dental-solutions/comprehensive-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.archdentalfargo.com/fargo-dental-solutions/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.archdentalfargo.com/fargo-dental-solutions/cosmetic-dentistry/smile-design/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.archdentalfargo.com/fargo-dental-solutions/restorative-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.archdentalfargo.com/fargo-dental-solutions/comprehensive-dentistry/invisalign/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.archdentalfargo.com/smile-gallery/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…pw (39 chars) in https://www.archdentalfargo.com/contact/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • link.roadsideconnect.io (2 script tags)
    • translate.google.com (8 script tags)
    • kit.fontawesome.com (8 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
11 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 100 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 100 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 100 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 100 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 100 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.archdentalfargo.com

Sites scoring near www.archdentalfargo.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.archdentalfargo.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.archdentalfargo.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.archdentalfargo.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.