Scanned sites / www.choiceroofcontractors.com / 2026-09-12-1942

www.choiceroofcontractors.com scan from 2026-09-12 19:42:19 UTC DR 32

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.choiceroofcontractors.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-1942

Scanned 2026-09-12 19:42:19 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 23:11:15 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

80/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 1625 pages and 215 assets of www.choiceroofcontractors.com, starting from https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/. It scored 80 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (1,299), heavy assets (31), title tags (671); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.7), heavy assets (−6), title tags (−4.3). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
1625
Assets fetched
215
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

1,840 of 2,009 discovered URLs were fetched, 63 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 58 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags671 issues
    671 of 1419 pages have title issues. 133 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.3 points
  • Meta descriptions1,299 issues
    1299 of 1419 pages have meta description issues. 133 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.7 points
  • Headings7 issues
    7 of 1419 pages have heading issues. 133 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links2 issues
    3 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 19 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 57 destinations checked.
    −0.1 points
  • Redirects59 issues
    70 redirecting URLs, 23 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses3 issues
    99 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 73 of them are pages, 3 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability232 issues
    232 of 1445 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 107 pages noindex by design.
    −1.5 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2924 image references have no alt attribute. 10 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets31 issues
    31 assets larger than 500 KB among 215 fetched assets. 3 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages138 issues
    138 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage240 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 1176 URLs: 78 crawled pages missing, 24 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 138 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.9 points
  • Internal link counts99 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 99 worth a look.
  • Thin content14 issues
    14 of 1419 pages have fewer than 200 words. 133 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format24 noted
    24 of 1625 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals43 noted
    43 of 1552 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives1,533 noted
    1533 pages carry a robots directive; 19 carry none.
  • Anchor text8 noted
    8 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1,325 noted
    1325 of 1419 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 133 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length9 noted
    9 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies6 noted
    6 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 1552 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 1840 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 1552 pages; 1518 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2337 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.choiceroofcontractors.com scores 80%, higher than 50% of the 2337 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites80% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several areas needing attention, including broken links, redirects, and title/meta description issues. Address these to improve SEO performance and user experience significantly.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links harm user experience and SEO. Correcting them will enhance site navigation.

    How: Identify 3 internal links leading to 404 pages and remove or update them to point to valid URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Too many redirects, especially chains, can slow down your site and affect SEO.

    How: Minimize 70 redirecting URLs, focusing on the 23 chained redirects to simplify linking.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: 99 non-200 responses hinder accessibility and rankings.

    How: Review and fix 99 URLs that return error statuses, ensuring they respond with a 2xx status.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 671 pages have title issues that can impact search ranking.

    How: Rewrite title tags to be unique and within the recommended length (30-60 characters) for better SEO.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 1143 pages have meta description issues, which can lower click-through rates.

    How: Revise meta descriptions to be within the optimal length (50-160 characters) and reflect page content accurately.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Fix Headings Issues

    Why: Improper heading usage affects content structure and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 tag and correct pages with multiple H1s or missing H1 tags.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several critical security vulnerabilities that need immediate attention, including missing security headers and outdated libraries. Implementing these fixes can enhance the site's protection against various attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may be vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks if they forget to use HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to all pages.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows any script to execute, increasing the risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' to all pages.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Not having this header allows clickjacking attacks, as your pages could be embedded in frames.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to all pages.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable jQuery LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 1.11.1 exposes the site to known vulnerabilities including cross-site scripting.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or newer.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might interpret files incorrectly, risking content injection.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to all pages.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/nationwide-commercial-roofing-network/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/history-of-the-group/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contractor-network/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/what-contractors-are-saying/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/trusted-partners/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/supported-companies/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/the-bigger-picture-behind-this-group/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/metal-construction-association-are-you-overlooking-metal-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 1552 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/nationwide-commercial-roofing-network/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/history-of-the-group/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contractor-network/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/what-contractors-are-saying/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/trusted-partners/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/supported-companies/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/the-bigger-picture-behind-this-group/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/metal-construction-association-are-you-overlooking-metal-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/nationwide-commercial-roofing-network/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/history-of-the-group/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contractor-network/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/what-contractors-are-saying/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/trusted-partners/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/supported-companies/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/the-bigger-picture-behind-this-group/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/metal-construction-association-are-you-overlooking-metal-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/nationwide-commercial-roofing-network/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/history-of-the-group/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contractor-network/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/what-contractors-are-saying/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/trusted-partners/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/supported-companies/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/the-bigger-picture-behind-this-group/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/metal-construction-association-are-you-overlooking-metal-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.11.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.11.1 in https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/workshop-payment/jquery-1.11.1.min.js: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • d2tgfbvjf3q6hn.cloudfront.net (40 script tags)
    • www.googleadservices.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (80 script tags)
    • platform-api.sharethis.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /oldsite-15-Dec-2020/
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 1552 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    288 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.choiceroofcontractors.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.choiceroofcontractors.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.choiceroofcontractors.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.choiceroofcontractors.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.