Scanned sites / www.choiceroofcontractors.com

SEO report for www.choiceroofcontractors.com DR 32

The latest Site Spider scan of www.choiceroofcontractors.com, with 5 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-choiceroofcontractors-com/2026-10-03-0648.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-10-03 06:48:08 UTC, finished 2026-10-03 09:07:40 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

80/ 100Good

On October 3, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 1624 pages and 236 assets of www.choiceroofcontractors.com, starting from https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/. It scored 80 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (1,298), heavy assets (32), title tags (669); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.7), heavy assets (−6), title tags (−4.3). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
1624
Assets fetched
236
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

1,860 of 2,030 discovered URLs were fetched, 64 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 58 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags669 issues
    669 of 1418 pages have title issues. 135 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.3 points
  • Meta descriptions1,298 issues
    1298 of 1418 pages have meta description issues. 135 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.7 points
  • Headings7 issues
    7 of 1418 pages have heading issues. 135 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links3 issues
    3 internal links point at 3 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 19 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 58 destinations checked.
    −0.1 points
  • Redirects56 issues
    67 redirecting URLs, 23 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses4 issues
    97 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 71 of them are pages, 4 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability234 issues
    234 of 1446 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 107 pages noindex by design.
    −1.5 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2922 image references have no alt attribute. 10 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets32 issues
    32 assets larger than 500 KB among 236 fetched assets. 3 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages138 issues
    138 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage242 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 1177 URLs: 78 crawled pages missing, 26 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 138 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.9 points
  • Internal link counts99 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 99 worth a look.
  • Thin content14 issues
    14 of 1418 pages have fewer than 200 words. 135 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format23 noted
    23 of 1624 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals45 noted
    45 of 1553 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives1,534 noted
    1534 pages carry a robots directive; 19 carry none.
  • Anchor text8 noted
    8 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1,324 noted
    1324 of 1418 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 135 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length9 noted
    9 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies4 noted
    4 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 1553 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookies1 noted
    1 cookie set by the site, 1 missing a protective flag; 16 response headers recorded across 1860 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 1553 pages; 1519 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 52 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

What changed since the last scan

Score unchanged

www.choiceroofcontractors.com scored 80 out of 100 in both of its last two scans. That is a steady score, not an unchanged site: 26 findings changed between the two scans. 2 URLs the earlier crawl reached were not reached this time. Across 5 scans on record the score has ended up where it started, at 80.

  • Pages: 2 gone
  • Broken links: 2 new
  • Page status codes: 2 changed
  • H1 headings: 2 changed
  • Internal links to the page: 18 changed
  • 2 URLs from the earlier crawl were not reached this time
  1. 2026-09-12 19:42:19 UTC80/1001,625 pages
  2. 2026-09-13 03:32:19 UTC80/1001,625 pages
  3. 2026-09-13 20:47:40 UTC80/1001,625 pages
  4. 2026-10-02 14:22:11 UTC80/1001,624 pages
  5. 2026-10-03 06:48:08 UTC80/1001,624 pages

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2336 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.choiceroofcontractors.com scores 80%, higher than 50% of the 2336 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 109 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites80% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis (rules v4). The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a solid health score, but several areas need improvement. The top priorities are fixing broken links, reducing redundant redirects, and optimizing title tags and meta descriptions to enhance visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links hinder user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove the broken links listed in the reports.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Reduce Redirects

    Why: Chained redirects waste resources and slow down page load time.

    How: Streamline or remove the redirect chains as reported.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Handling these responses improves site accessibility.

    How: Fix or audit the URLs that return non-200 responses.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improving title tags boosts search engine rankings.

    How: Revise the 669 problematic titles to ensure they're concise and relevant.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Well-crafted meta descriptions enhance click-through rates.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for the 1298 pages with issues.

    Evidence: 80 pages have no meta description at all.

    80 pages affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Resolve Heading Issues

    Why: Proper heading structure improves content readability and SEO.

    How: Correct the 7 pages with heading issues to ensure proper hierarchy.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several important security configurations missing, increasing the risk of various attacks, including clickjacking and data exposure. It's crucial to implement recommended headers and update libraries to ensure a more secure experience for visitors.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted on initial requests.

    Fix: Add the header: 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload'.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts and resources, raising the risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add a CSP header, e.g., 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, your website is vulnerable to clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: 'X-Frame-Options: DENY'.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Cookies Missing Protective FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Without proper flags, cookies can be accessed by scripts and transmitted unsecured.

    Fix: Set the flags for 'PHPSESSID': 'HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=Lax'.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  5. 5

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 1.11.1 presents known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  6. 6

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this option, browsers may execute files in unintended ways.

    Fix: Add the header: 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff'.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  7. 7

    Missing Referrer Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Absence of this policy can leak sensitive URL information.

    Fix: Add the header: 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer'.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  8. 8

    Exposing Server Version in HeadersLow

    Why it matters: Revealing software details can help attackers exploit known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Disable 'X-Powered-By' header and consider obscuring server details in responses.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  9. 9

    Permissions Policy Not ImplementedInfo

    Why it matters: A missing permissions policy leaves sensitive features accessible.

    Fix: Consider adding a Permissions-Policy header to limit unnecessary access.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/nationwide-commercial-roofing-network/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/history-of-the-group/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contractor-network/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/what-contractors-are-saying/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/trusted-partners/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/supported-companies/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/is-your-commercial-roof-ready-for-coating/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/the-bigger-picture-behind-this-group/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 1553 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/nationwide-commercial-roofing-network/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/history-of-the-group/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contractor-network/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/what-contractors-are-saying/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/trusted-partners/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/supported-companies/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/is-your-commercial-roof-ready-for-coating/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/the-bigger-picture-behind-this-group/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/nationwide-commercial-roofing-network/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/history-of-the-group/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contractor-network/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/what-contractors-are-saying/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/trusted-partners/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/supported-companies/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/is-your-commercial-roof-ready-for-coating/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/the-bigger-picture-behind-this-group/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/nationwide-commercial-roofing-network/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/history-of-the-group/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contractor-network/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/what-contractors-are-saying/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/trusted-partners/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/supported-companies/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/is-your-commercial-roof-ready-for-coating/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/the-bigger-picture-behind-this-group/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/nationwide-commercial-roofing-network/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/history-of-the-group/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/blog/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contractor-network/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/what-contractors-are-saying/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/trusted-partners/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contact/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/supported-companies/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/is-your-commercial-roof-ready-for-coating/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/the-bigger-picture-behind-this-group/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    88 of 1553 HTML pages send permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/nationwide-commercial-roofing-network/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/history-of-the-group/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/blog/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contractor-network/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/trusted-partners/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/contact/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/supported-companies/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/is-your-commercial-roof-ready-for-coating/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/the-bigger-picture-behind-this-group/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/metal-construction-association-are-you-overlooking-metal-roofing/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: cloudflare (1860 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Rocket/3.10.2 (16 responses)
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    1 of 1 cookie are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • PHPSESSID (set by https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/robots.txt) lacks SameSite
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.11.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.11.1 in https://www.choiceroofcontractors.com/workshop-payment/jquery-1.11.1.min.js: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • d2tgfbvjf3q6hn.cloudfront.net (40 script tags)
    • www.googleadservices.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (80 script tags)
    • platform-api.sharethis.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /oldsite-15-Dec-2020/
5 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 1553 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    287 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.choiceroofcontractors.com

Sites scoring near www.choiceroofcontractors.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.choiceroofcontractors.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.choiceroofcontractors.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.choiceroofcontractors.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.