Scanned sites / www.capitaleyecare.com / 2026-11-03-0422

www.capitaleyecare.com scan from 2026-11-03 04:22:03 UTC DR 6

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-03-0422

Scanned 2026-11-03 04:22:03 UTC, finished 2026-11-03 05:21:50 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.capitaleyecare.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

89/ 100Good

On November 3, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 196 pages and 51 assets of www.capitaleyecare.com, starting from https://www.capitaleyecare.com/. It scored 89 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (57), sitemap coverage (64), meta descriptions (43); 15 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−3.5), sitemap coverage (−2.4), meta descriptions (−2.1). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 3 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
196
Assets fetched
51
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

247 of 247 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 16 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags57 issues
    57 of 72 pages have title issues. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Meta descriptions43 issues
    43 of 72 pages have meta description issues. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.1 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 72 pages have heading issues. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links11 issues
    558 internal links point at 11 broken URLs.
    −1.4 points
  • Links to other sites689 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 8 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 16 destinations checked.
  • Redirects20 issues
    19 redirecting URLs, 5 of them chained.
    −0.5 points
  • Non-200 responses15 issues
    34 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 34 of them are pages, 15 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.9 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 72 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 90 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 772 image references have no alt attribute. 4 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 51 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage64 issues
    1 sitemap listing 8 URLs: 64 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.4 points
  • Internal link counts99 noted
    Internal link counts for 162 pages; 99 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 72 pages have fewer than 200 words. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format15 noted
    15 of 196 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 162 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives155 noted
    155 pages carry a robots directive; 7 carry none.
  • Anchor text93 noted
    93 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure69 noted
    69 of 72 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies9 noted
    9 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validation162 noted
    162 of 162 pages have HTML problems: 162 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    162 of 72 indexable pages carry structured data: WebPage (162), Organization (162), http://data-vocabulary.org/MedicalClinic (162), http://data-vocabulary.org/Address (162), Person (6). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates6 noted
    6 pages in 3 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 162 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions3 noted
    3 of 72 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 247 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 162 pages; 115 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling21 noted
    21 words an English dictionary does not know, on 21 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2688 sites, median 80%, average 78%

www.capitaleyecare.com scores 89%, higher than 85% of the 2688 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0621240%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 16 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 40 sites67%: 40 sites68%: 38 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 77 sites72%: 74 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 77 sites75%: 86 sites76%: 96 sites77%: 107 sites78%: 121 sites79%: 109 sites80%: 124 sites81%: 120 sites82%: 122 sites83%: 118 sites84%: 124 sites85%: 102 sites86%: 90 sites87%: 91 sites88%: 76 sites89%: 73 sites90%: 51 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 23 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites89% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has a good health score, but there are several issues that need immediate fixing—especially broken links, redirect chains, and missing meta descriptions. Address these for better user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Eliminating broken links enhances user experience and boosts SEO.

    How: Identify and remove or update links pointing to broken URLs like the 404s for your privacy policy.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Correct Redirect Chains

    Why: Reducing redirect chains improves site speed and crawl efficiency.

    How: Replace chained redirects with direct links to the final destination.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Add Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions help improve click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create concise, relevant descriptions for the 23 pages missing them.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Proper title tags enhance SEO and provide clearer context to users.

    How: Revise title tags shorter than 30 characters for the 57 affected pages.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses hinder accessibility and SEO.

    How: Fix 34 URLs not returning a 2xx response by addressing their source issues.

    Checks: status-codes

  6. 6

    Expand Sitemap Coverage

    Why: A comprehensive sitemap helps search engines find all your important pages.

    How: Add the 64 missing pages to your sitemap for improved indexing.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has several security issues that need addressing, particularly around HTTP headers that can enhance user safety and privacy. High-priority concerns include the lack of HSTS and exposed API keys, which could lead to unauthorized access. Addressing these is vital to protect user data and prevent potential attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 3 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors not using HTTPS can be intercepted.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed API key can lead to misuse and unauthorized access to your API resources.

    Fix: Restrict the API key by HTTP referrer and configure it in the Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  3. 3

    Absence of Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: No referrer policy may compromise user privacy by leaking full URLs.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  4. 4

    Software Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing server version can aid attackers in exploiting known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Configure the server to hide the version information.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Lack of SRI makes the site vulnerable if third-party scripts are compromised.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity where applicable, or impose Content-Security-Policy on these scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: A permissions-policy header can limit what third-party scripts can access.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=("none"), microphone=("none"), camera=("none").

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  7. 7

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The listed paths can reveal potential attack vectors to interested parties.

    Fix: Consider applying proper access controls to these paths instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/appointment-request-form/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/patient-history-form/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/hours-location/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/the-staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eyeglasses-contacts/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/insurance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/management-of-ocular-diseases/glaucoma-testing-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/your-eye-health/eye-diseases/diabetes-and-eyesight/treatment-for-diabe… → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/appointment-request-form/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/patient-history-form/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/hours-location/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/the-staff/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eyeglasses-contacts/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/insurance/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/management-of-ocular-diseases/glaucoma-testing-treatment/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/your-eye-health/eye-diseases/diabetes-and-eyesight/treatment-for-diabe… → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/appointment-request-form/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/patient-history-form/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/hours-location/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/the-staff/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eyeglasses-contacts/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/insurance/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/management-of-ocular-diseases/glaucoma-testing-treatment/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/your-eye-health/eye-diseases/diabetes-and-eyesight/treatment-for-diabe… → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: nginx/1.26.3 (247 responses)
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…uY (39 chars) in https://www.capitaleyecare.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googleadservices.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
8 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 162 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 162 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 162 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    116 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.capitaleyecare.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.capitaleyecare.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.capitaleyecare.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.capitaleyecare.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.