Scanned sites / www.brunilaw.com / 2026-11-05-0214

www.brunilaw.com scan from 2026-11-05 02:14:34 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-05-0214

Scanned 2026-11-05 02:14:34 UTC, finished 2026-11-05 02:17:18 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.brunilaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

91/ 100Excellent

On November 5, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 11 pages and 109 assets of www.brunilaw.com, starting from https://www.brunilaw.com/. It scored 91 out of 100, an excellent result. 2 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (7), meta descriptions (3); 23 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−6.4), meta descriptions (−2.2). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
11
Assets fetched
109
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
2 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

120 of 120 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 3 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags7 issues
    7 of 11 pages have title issues.
    −6.4 points
  • Meta descriptions3 issues
    3 of 11 pages have meta description issues.
    −2.2 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 11 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites11 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 3 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 11 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 46 image references have no alt attribute. 40 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 109 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    2 sitemaps listing 11 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 11 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 11 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 11 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 11 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives11 noted
    11 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure3 noted
    3 of 11 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length4 noted
    4 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 11 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    11 of 11 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (11), ListItem (11), WebSite (11), WebPage (11). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 11 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 11 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions5 noted
    5 of 11 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 16 response headers recorded across 120 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 11 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling2 noted
    2 words an English dictionary does not know, on 2 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2858 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.brunilaw.com scores 91%, higher than 87% of the 2858 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 75 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 131 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 126 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 129 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 96 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 74 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites91% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The website has some SEO opportunities, particularly in optimizing title tags and meta descriptions. Addressing redirects will also improve site structure. Focus on these issues first for enhanced visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can cause unnecessary delays in loading and affect SEO.

    How: Change the sitemap URL from https://www.brunilaw.com/sitemap.xml to https://www.brunilaw.com/sitemap_index.xml in your links.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Long title tags may be cut off in search results, reducing click-through rates.

    How: Shorten title tags to under 60 characters for the affected pages, ensuring relevance and clarity.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Revise Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions longer than 160 characters may be truncated, affecting user engagement.

    How: Edit meta descriptions to be concise and under 160 characters for the specific pages mentioned.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

This security review highlights several important findings that need attention on your site. Key issues include the lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) and Content Security Policy (CSP) headers, which are essential for protecting users from interception and script injection. Additionally, there are vulnerable JavaScript libraries and a leaked Google API key. These findings should be addressed to enhance the security of your website.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted on their first request if they enter the site without https://.

    Fix: Implement HSTS by adding the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP) HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP leaves your site vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) and other forms of code injection.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header to specify allowed content sources, for example: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: Using outdated libraries like jQuery 1.4.0 and Bootstrap 3.3.7 can expose the site to known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0 and Bootstrap to at least version 3.4.1.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: Exposing sensitive keys can lead to unauthorized access to your API services.

    Fix: Restrict the API key usage to specific referrers in the Google Cloud Console to minimize risks.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Third-party Scripts Missing Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Lack of SRI means a compromise of the third-party script could impact your site.

    Fix: Consider implementing a Content-Security-Policy that specifies trusted domains to mitigate risks.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Without this header, browser features like microphone or camera access cannot be restricted, allowing potential attacks.

    Fix: Add a Permissions-Policy header to disable unused features, e.g., Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self).

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.brunilaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/estate-planning-firm-marda-loop/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/amanda-bruni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/janice-bruni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/michael-bruni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/adult-guardianship-trusteeship-lawyers-marda-loop/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/estate-planning-lawyers-marda-loop/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/estate-administration-lawyers-marda-loop/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/residential-real-estate-lawyers-marda-loop/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/estate-planning-blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/legal-consultation-marda-loop/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 11 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.brunilaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/estate-planning-firm-marda-loop/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/amanda-bruni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/janice-bruni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/michael-bruni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/adult-guardianship-trusteeship-lawyers-marda-loop/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/estate-planning-lawyers-marda-loop/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/estate-administration-lawyers-marda-loop/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/residential-real-estate-lawyers-marda-loop/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/estate-planning-blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/legal-consultation-marda-loop/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.brunilaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/estate-planning-firm-marda-loop/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/amanda-bruni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/janice-bruni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/michael-bruni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/adult-guardianship-trusteeship-lawyers-marda-loop/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/estate-planning-lawyers-marda-loop/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/estate-administration-lawyers-marda-loop/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/residential-real-estate-lawyers-marda-loop/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/estate-planning-blog/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.brunilaw.com/legal-consultation-marda-loop/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.4.0, Bootstrap 3.3.7. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.4.0 in https://www.brunilaw.com/wp-content/plugins/fusion-extension-content-roll/inclu…: CVE-2012-6708 (selector XSS), CVE-2015-9251, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023; fixed in 3.5.0
    • Bootstrap 3.3.7 in https://www.brunilaw.com/wp-content/themes/fusion-base/js/vendor/bootstrap.min.…: CVE-2016-10735, CVE-2018-14040, CVE-2018-14041, CVE-2018-14042, CVE-2019-8331 (XSS through data attributes in tooltip, popover, collapse and scrollspy); fixed in 3.4.1
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…UQ (39 chars) in https://www.brunilaw.com/legal-consultation-marda-loop/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • maps.googleapis.com (1 script tag)
8 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 11 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 11 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 11 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 11 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.brunilaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.brunilaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.brunilaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.brunilaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.