Scanned sites / www.arpis.com / 2026-11-02-1112

www.arpis.com scan from 2026-11-02 11:12:06 UTC DR 28

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.arpis.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-02-1112

Scanned 2026-11-02 11:12:06 UTC, finished 2026-11-02 14:41:53 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.arpis.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

72/ 100Needs work

On November 2, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 2902 pages and 633 assets of www.arpis.com, starting from https://www.arpis.com/. It scored 72 out of 100, a result that needs work. 12 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (2,045), heavy assets (20), broken links (609); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.7), heavy assets (−6), broken links (−5.7). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
2902
Assets fetched
633
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

3,535 of 3,542 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 193 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags354 issues
    354 of 2116 pages have title issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.7 points
  • Meta descriptions2,045 issues
    2045 of 2116 pages have meta description issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.7 points
  • Headings84 issues
    84 of 2116 pages have heading issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken links609 issues
    1272 internal links point at 609 broken URLs.
    −5.7 points
  • Links to other sites6 issues
    6 destinations answered with an error, 148 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 193 destinations checked.
    −0.1 points
  • Redirects164 issues
    165 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses609 issues
    780 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 773 of them are pages, 609 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −2.9 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 2125 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 4 pages noindex by design. 1 noindex page is listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore it.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 24297 image references have no alt attribute. 10791 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets20 issues
    20 assets larger than 500 KB among 633 fetched assets. 74 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages59 issues
    59 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage256 issues
    13 sitemaps listing 1921 URLs: 196 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 59 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.7 points
  • Internal link counts335 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 335 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 2116 pages have fewer than 200 words. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content608 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −2.3 points
  • URL format104 noted
    104 of 2902 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals12 noted
    12 of 2129 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives2,129 noted
    2129 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text664 noted
    664 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1,967 noted
    1967 of 2116 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length58 noted
    30 images over 100 KB; 28 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies156 noted
    156 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 2129 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data1 noted
    2129 of 2116 indexable pages carry structured data: WebSite (2129), Organization (2129), BreadcrumbList (2094), ListItem (2094), ImageObject (2028). 1 page with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates1,227 noted
    1227 pages in 19 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 2129 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions198 noted
    198 of 2057 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination1 noted
    236 pages in pagination sequences; 1 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    2 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 3535 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 2129 pages; 2051 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling153 noted
    153 words an English dictionary does not know, on 588 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2598 sites, median 80%, average 78%

www.arpis.com scores 72%, higher than 22% of the 2598 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0601190%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 5 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 5 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 40 sites67%: 39 sites68%: 37 sites69%: 48 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 74 sites72%: 73 sites73%: 77 sites74%: 75 sites75%: 85 sites76%: 94 sites77%: 106 sites78%: 116 sites79%: 106 sites80%: 119 sites81%: 113 sites82%: 117 sites83%: 117 sites84%: 118 sites85%: 97 sites86%: 87 sites87%: 84 sites88%: 68 sites89%: 71 sites90%: 46 sites91%: 57 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 16 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites72% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has significant issues that need fixing, primarily broken links and non-200 responses. Focus on resolving these to improve user experience and SEO. Addressing meta descriptions and headings will enhance visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 1272 internal links are broken, impacting user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify and update the links to point to the correct URLs using a link checker tool.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 780 URLs (mostly pages) are not returning a 200 status, affecting site accessibility.

    How: Review these URLs and fix or remove them to ensure they return a 200 status code.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 2045 pages have meta description issues. Relevant descriptions can improve CTR.

    How: Draft unique meta descriptions for the identified pages, focusing on keywords and page content.

    Evidence: 2003 pages have no meta description at all.

    2,003 pages affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: 84 pages require heading fixes for better content structure and SEO.

    How: Add missing H1 tags or resolve issues of multiple H1 tags for those pages.

    Evidence: 59 pages: missing h1.

    59 pages affected

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Shrink Heavy Assets

    Why: 20 assets over 500 KB can slow down page load times.

    How: Optimize image sizes and compress heavy documents if possible.

    Evidence: 567 KB of image, loaded by 3 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    3 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Address Sitemap Coverage Issues

    Why: 196 URLs missing from the sitemap can hinder indexing.

    How: Update the sitemap to include all relevant URLs and ensure accuracy.

    Evidence: 196 URLs: not in sitemap.

    196 pages affected

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has multiple security vulnerabilities, including missing HTTP headers for security, cookies lacking protective flags, and the use of outdated JavaScript libraries with known vulnerabilities. Addressing these issues will enhance protection against various web threats.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HSTS HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users accessing the site via HTTP can be intercepted.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to your HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: The lack of X-Frame-Options allows clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Include 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' in response headers.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing Secure Cookie FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Cookies without Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite flags can be exploited.

    Fix: Set cookies with the attributes 'Secure', 'HttpOnly', and 'SameSite=Strict'.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: Using outdated libraries can expose the site to known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, users may experience MIME type confusion.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to your HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer-PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a referrer policy, sensitive URL information may be disclosed when users navigate away.

    Fix: Include 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer' in your response headers.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Lack of Permissions Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Not restricting browser feature access may lead to unauthorized operations.

    Fix: Add 'Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(none), microphone=(none), camera=(none)' to your headers.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.arpis.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/homeowners/vip-savings/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/my-account/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/book-online/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/new/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/repair/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/cleaning/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/new/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/repair/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/maintenance/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 2129 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.arpis.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/homeowners/vip-savings/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/book-online/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/new/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/repair/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/cleaning/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/new/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/repair/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/maintenance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/condo-ac/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.arpis.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/homeowners/vip-savings/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/my-account/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/book-online/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/new/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/repair/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/cleaning/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/new/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/repair/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/maintenance/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.arpis.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/homeowners/vip-savings/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/my-account/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/book-online/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/new/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/repair/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/cleaning/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/new/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/repair/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/maintenance/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.arpis.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/homeowners/vip-savings/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/my-account/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/book-online/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/new/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/repair/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/cleaning/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/new/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/repair/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/maintenance/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    302 of 304 cookies are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • 02 Nov 2026 11:54:07 GMT (set by https://www.arpis.com/?post_type=product&p=2832) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 02 Nov 2026 12:02:13 GMT (set by https://www.arpis.com/blog/save-bigtime-holiday-energy-use-these-tips/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 02 Nov 2026 12:02:14 GMT (set by https://www.arpis.com/blog/get-more-out-your-programmable-thermostat-winter/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 02 Nov 2026 12:04:46 GMT (set by https://www.arpis.com/blog/2016/11/01/programming-your-thermostat-winter) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 02 Nov 2026 12:04:47 GMT (set by https://www.arpis.com/blog/2016/12/06/signs-your-ductwork-too-old) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 02 Nov 2026 12:13:09 GMT (set by https://www.arpis.com/sites/default/files/home_comfort_guide.pdf) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 02 Nov 2026 12:13:13 GMT (set by https://www.arpis.com/blog/factors-show-why-you-should-choose-energy-star-equip…) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 02 Nov 2026 12:13:22 GMT (set by https://www.arpis.com/blog/let-zoning-system-resolve-your-home-comfort-challeng…) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 02 Nov 2026 12:14:38 GMT (set by https://www.arpis.com/products-services/water-softeners) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 02 Nov 2026 12:14:39 GMT (set by https://www.arpis.com/products-services/plumbing) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 02 Nov 2026 12:14:40 GMT (set by https://www.arpis.com/blog/2015/04/09/tankless-or-storage-comparing-water-heate…) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 02 Nov 2026 12:14:41 GMT (set by https://www.arpis.com/blog/free-home-comfort-solutions-guide/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.5.21, jQuery 3.2.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.5.21 in https://www.arpis.com/wp-content/plugins/search-filter-pro/public/assets/js/cho…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 3.2.1 in https://www.arpis.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery.mi…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (3535 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (2915 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 7 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn-dfhgl.nitrocdn.com (1366 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • app.avoca.ai (40 script tags)
    • embed.scheduler.servicetitan.com (2 script tags)
    • sdk.amazonaws.com (1 script tag)
    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 2129 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 2129 pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    5 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.arpis.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.arpis.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.arpis.com?