Scanned sites / www.arpis.com / 2026-10-03-1130

www.arpis.com scan from 10/3/2026, 11:30:26 AM

Scan 2026-10-03-1130

Scanned 10/3/2026, 11:30:26 AM, finished 10/4/2026, 1:30:56 AM. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.arpis.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

72/ 100Needs work

On October 3, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 2902 pages and 998 assets of www.arpis.com, starting from https://www.arpis.com/. It scored 72 out of 100, a result that needs work. 12 of 23 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (2,045), heavy assets (22), broken links (609); 3 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.7), heavy assets (−6), broken links (−5.7). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
2902
Assets fetched
998
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 23
CoverageComplete crawl

3,900 of 3,907 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 216 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags354 issues
    354 of 2116 pages have title issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.7 points
  • Meta descriptions2,045 issues
    2045 of 2116 pages have meta description issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.7 points
  • Headings84 issues
    84 of 2116 pages have heading issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken links609 issues
    1272 internal links point at 609 broken URLs.
    −5.7 points
  • Links to other sites6 issues
    6 destinations answered with an error, 148 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 216 destinations checked.
    −0.1 points
  • Redirects164 issues
    165 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses609 issues
    780 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 773 of them are pages, 609 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −2.9 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 2125 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 4 pages noindex by design. 1 noindex page is listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore it.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 24297 image references have no alt attribute. 10791 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets22 issues
    22 assets larger than 500 KB among 998 fetched assets. 74 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages59 issues
    59 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage256 issues
    13 sitemaps listing 1921 URLs: 196 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 59 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.7 points
  • Internal link counts335 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 335 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 2116 pages have fewer than 200 words. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content596 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −2.2 points
  • URL format104 noted
    104 of 2902 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals12 noted
    12 of 2129 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives2,129 noted
    2129 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text664 noted
    664 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1,967 noted
    1967 of 2116 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length108 noted
    80 images over 100 KB; 28 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies156 noted
    156 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2072 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.arpis.com scores 72%, higher than 22% of the 2072 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0521030%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 2 sites37%: 2 sites38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 1 site42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 3 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 9 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 7 sites55%: 7 sites56%: 5 sites57%: 11 sites58%: 15 sites59%: 7 sites60%: 12 sites61%: 9 sites62%: 18 sites63%: 21 sites64%: 17 sites65%: 36 sites66%: 27 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 33 sites70%: 35 sites71%: 62 sites72%: 68 sites73%: 56 sites74%: 60 sites75%: 79 sites76%: 77 sites77%: 87 sites78%: 93 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 98 sites81%: 100 sites82%: 103 sites83%: 89 sites84%: 91 sites85%: 68 sites86%: 68 sites87%: 65 sites88%: 67 sites89%: 48 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 42 sites92%: 23 sites93%: 19 sites94%: 15 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 4 sites97%: 10 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 1 site100%: 57 sites72% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis (rules v4). The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website shows several technical issues that can significantly impact SEO and user experience. Prioritize fixing broken links, title tag and meta description issues, and addressing orphan pages for better site performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 1272 broken internal links lead to a poor user experience and can affect rankings.

    How: Identify broken links and either update or remove them. Use anchor text effectively.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 780 URLs returning errors can harm user accessibility and SEO performance.

    How: Investigate these URLs, redirect or fix them as necessary.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 354 pages have issues with titles affecting click-through rates and search visibility.

    How: Revise title tags to be unique and under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 2045 pages have meta description issues, impacting search snippet displays.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for pages without one, ensuring they are enticing.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: 59 orphan pages are not linked internally, limiting their visibility.

    How: Add internal links to these pages to improve their discoverability.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Consider Heavy Assets Optimization

    Why: 22 assets over 500 KB can slow down page loading times.

    How: Compress images and consider hosting documents elsewhere if not needed on-page.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security vulnerabilities that need addressing. The most critical issue is the absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security, which can lead to interception of user data. Additionally, missing X-Frame-Options and vulnerable JavaScript libraries can put site visitors and data at risk.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted when accessing the site via non-secure HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Insufficient Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of X-Frame-Options allows your pages to be embedded in frames, risking user data.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or use a CSP frame-ancestors directive.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: Using vulnerable libraries (jQuery 2.5.21, 3.1.3) can expose the site to attacks.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without X-Content-Type-Options, browsers may misinterpret files as scripts based on content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Lacking Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: No referrer policy can expose users' complete URLs when they navigate away.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Without a permissions policy, browser features can be abused by scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: deny camera; deny microphone; deny geolocation

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.arpis.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/homeowners/vip-savings/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/my-account/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/book-online/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/new/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/repair/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/cleaning/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/new/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/repair/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/maintenance/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 2129 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.arpis.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/homeowners/vip-savings/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/book-online/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/new/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/repair/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/cleaning/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/new/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/repair/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/maintenance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/condo-ac/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.arpis.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/homeowners/vip-savings/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/my-account/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/book-online/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/new/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/repair/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/cleaning/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/new/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/repair/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/maintenance/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.arpis.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/homeowners/vip-savings/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/my-account/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/book-online/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/new/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/repair/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/cleaning/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/new/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/repair/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/maintenance/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.arpis.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/homeowners/vip-savings/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/my-account/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/book-online/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/new/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/repair/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/cleaning/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/new/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/repair/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/maintenance/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.5.21, jQuery 3.1.3. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.5.21 in https://www.arpis.com/wp-content/plugins/search-filter-pro/public/assets/js/cho…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 3.1.3 in https://www.arpis.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery.mi…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (3900 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (2915 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 7 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn-dfhgl.nitrocdn.com (1405 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • embed.scheduler.servicetitan.com (2 script tags)
    • sdk.amazonaws.com (1 script tag)
    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (1 script tag)
    • avoca.ai (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 2129 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 2129 pages.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    5 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.arpis.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.arpis.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.arpis.com?

www.arpis.com scan 2026-10-03-1130 | DIY SEO Hub