Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-10-09-0317

www.advocateslaw.com scan from 10/9/2026, 3:17:27 AM DR 32

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.advocateslaw.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-09-0317

Scanned 10/9/2026, 3:17:27 AM, finished 10/9/2026, 3:37:46 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On October 9, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 497 pages and 335 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 23 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (9), meta descriptions (256), title tags (159); 4 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−5.4), meta descriptions (−4.5), title tags (−3.5). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
497
Assets fetched
335
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 23
CoverageComplete crawl

832 of 832 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 287 left unchecked.

  • Title tags159 issues
    159 of 382 pages have title issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Meta descriptions256 issues
    256 of 382 pages have meta description issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.5 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 382 pages have heading issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links7 issues
    77 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 67 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 287 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.3 points
  • Redirects42 issues
    42 redirecting URLs, 15 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses7 issues
    50 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 44 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability44 issues
    44 of 402 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.
    −1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2182 image references have no alt attribute. 634 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets9 issues
    9 assets larger than 500 KB among 335 fetched assets.
    −5.4 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage107 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 282 URLs: 103 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.4 points
  • Internal link counts102 noted
    Internal link counts for 453 pages; 102 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 382 pages have fewer than 200 words. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content7 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format15 noted
    15 of 497 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals71 noted
    71 of 453 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives444 noted
    444 pages carry a robots directive; 9 carry none.
  • Anchor text92 noted
    92 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure154 noted
    154 of 382 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length117 noted
    89 images over 100 KB; 28 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies3 noted
    3 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2169 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.advocateslaw.com scores 83%, higher than 66% of the 2169 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0551090%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 2 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 2 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 6 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 4 sites50%: 4 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 9 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 8 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 6 sites60%: 14 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 24 sites64%: 18 sites65%: 37 sites66%: 29 sites67%: 33 sites68%: 33 sites69%: 38 sites70%: 42 sites71%: 66 sites72%: 73 sites73%: 66 sites74%: 60 sites75%: 76 sites76%: 80 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 98 sites79%: 87 sites80%: 103 sites81%: 101 sites82%: 109 sites83%: 91 sites84%: 99 sites85%: 73 sites86%: 68 sites87%: 63 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 57 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 40 sites92%: 27 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 13 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 5 sites97%: 11 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 1 site100%: 62 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your website has identified issues that require attention, particularly with broken links, redirects, and missing meta descriptions. Addressing these will enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Eliminating broken links improves user experience and site credibility.

    How: Identify the 77 internal links pointing to broken URLs and either update or remove them from your site. Use tools to locate all linking pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Reduce Redirects

    Why: Chained redirects can slow down page loading, impacting user experience and SEO.

    How: Analyze the 42 redirecting URLs, aiming to consolidate where possible to create direct links to final destinations.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages that do not return a 2xx response can lead to poor indexation and user experience.

    How: Check the 50 URLs that returned non-200 responses; rectify errors or update links accordingly.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Complete and unique meta descriptions can improve click-through rates from search results.

    How: Write meta descriptions for the 123 pages currently missing them and ensure all descriptions are unique and relevant.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Revise Title Tags

    Why: Optimizing title tags aids in SEO and ensures clarity for users in search results.

    How: Adjust the 159 pages with title issues to meet best practices, focusing on relevance and character limits.

    Checks: titles

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Reducing asset size improves loading speed, enhancing user experience.

    How: Investigate the 9 assets over 500 KB and compress or optimize them without losing quality.

    Evidence: 475 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 450 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    450 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several critical security vulnerabilities, primarily concerning missing security headers that protect against various web attacks. These vulnerabilities can expose users to risks during their interaction with the site and should be prioritized for resolution.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may be susceptible to man-in-the-middle attacks when accessing the site.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: The absence of CSP allows scripts to load from any source, increasing the risk of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks.

    Fix: Add a CSP header like: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Lacking X-Frame-Options exposes the site to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 3.1.3 has known vulnerabilities related to XSS and other attacks.

    Fix: Update jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret files, potentially leading to code execution.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer-PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Not setting a referrer policy can expose sensitive URL information to third-party sites.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 453 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.3. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.1.3 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (832 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (495 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 453 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.advocateslaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.advocateslaw.com scan 2026-10-09-0317 | DIY SEO Hub