Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-10-05-1005
www.advocateslaw.com scan from 10/5/2026, 10:05:35 AM
Scan 2026-10-05-1005
Scanned 10/5/2026, 10:05:35 AM, finished 10/5/2026, 10:26:31 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass
Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On October 5, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 497 pages and 335 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 22 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (10), meta descriptions (256), title tags (159); 4 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.5), title tags (−3.5). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 1 check was not run because the crawl fetched nothing for it. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 497
- Assets fetched
- 335
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 10 of 22
832 of 832 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 587 link destinations on other sites have not been checked.
- Title tags159 issues159 of 382 pages have title issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−3.5 points
- Meta descriptions256 issues256 of 382 pages have meta description issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−4.5 points
- Headings3 issues3 of 382 pages have heading issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Broken links7 issues77 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.−0.3 points
- Links to other sitesNot checkedNot checked: the crawl fetched nothing this check can look at.
- Redirects42 issues42 redirecting URLs, 15 of them chained.−0.4 points
- Non-200 responses7 issues50 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 44 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.−0.2 points
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability44 issues44 of 402 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.−1 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 2182 image references have no alt attribute. 634 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets10 issues10 assets larger than 500 KB among 335 fetched assets.−6 points
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage107 issues9 sitemaps listing 282 URLs: 103 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.−1.4 points
- Internal link counts102 notedInternal link counts for 453 pages; 102 worth a look.
- Thin contentOK0 of 382 pages have fewer than 200 words. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate content7 issues1 group of pages with identical HTML.−0.1 points
- URL format15 noted15 of 497 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- Canonicals71 noted71 of 453 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives444 noted444 pages carry a robots directive; 9 carry none.
- Anchor text92 noted92 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure154 noted154 of 382 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length117 noted90 images over 100 KB; 27 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomalies3 noted3 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2077 sites, median 79%, average 78%
www.advocateslaw.com scores 83%, higher than 66% of the 2077 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsThe site has several critical SEO issues, particularly around redirects, broken links, and missing meta descriptions. Prioritizing fixes on these will improve both user experience and search rankings.
- 1
Fix Broken Internal Links
Why: Broken links hurt user experience and SEO crawling.
How: Update or remove links leading to missing pages from https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ and https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Address Redirect Chains
Why: Redirect chains slow down page speed and can dilute link equity.
How: Simplify the redirects by pointing directly to the final URLs, especially those affected by multiple hops.
Checks: redirects
- 3
Improve Title Tags
Why: Many title tags are either duplicated or not optimized, negatively affecting rankings.
How: Edit titles to be unique and fit within the recommended length for all affected pages.
Checks: titles
- 4
Enhance Meta Descriptions
Why: Missing or duplicate meta descriptions lead to poor click-through rates.
How: Create unique meta descriptions for 124 pages lacking them and differentiate shared ones.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 5
Fix Non-200 Responses
Why: Pages that do not return a 200 status can frustrate users and lead to poor indexing.
How: Identify and resolve issues causing non-200 responses, especially for 44 indexable pages.
Checks: status-codes
- 6
Optimize Heavy Assets
Why: Large assets slow down loading times, impacting user experience and SEO.
How: Compress or resize images and stylesheets exceeding the 500 KB threshold.
Checks: heavy-assets
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlYour website has several security deficiencies that expose it to risks such as data interception and injection attacks. Key issues include the absence of protective HTTP headers and the use of a vulnerable JavaScript library. Addressing these vulnerabilities will enhance the security and integrity of your site.
- 0 high
- 4 medium
- 2 low
- 1 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Lack of HSTS allows potential interception of users who enter the site without HTTPS.
Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium
Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts, styles, and frames, increasing XSS risks.
Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 3
Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium
Why it matters: Without this header, the site may be embedded in a frame leading to clickjacking attacks.
Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 4
Vulnerable JavaScript Library (jQuery 3.1.3)Medium
Why it matters: Contains known vulnerabilities; exploitation depends on usage scenarios.
Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.
Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries
- 5
Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow
Why it matters: Absence of this header allows browsers to interpret files based on content rather than declared type.
Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 6
Missing Referrer PolicyLow
Why it matters: Not controlling referrer information exposes potentially sensitive URLs when a user navigates away.
Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer
Evidence: Referrer policy
- 7
Missing Permissions PolicyInfo
Why it matters: Lack of this policy leaves browser features exposed, which could be misused by injected scripts.
Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: fullscreen=(self)
Evidence: Permissions policy
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 453 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
- FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium
1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.3. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.
- jQuery 3.1.3 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
- NoteSoftware version disclosure
Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.
- server: cloudflare (832 responses)
- x-powered-by: WP Engine (495 responses)
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
- widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
- OKHTTPS
All 453 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKCookie flags
All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- mergedeck.com84/100 · rank 525 · 200 pages
- www.ramsayanimalclinic.ca83/100 · rank 617 · 66 pages
- www.brightondentalstudio.com83/100 · rank 617 · 110 pages
- www.immigration-nation.ca83/100 · rank 617 · 1,927 pages
- www.beddingtondentalclinic.com83/100 · rank 617 · 158 pages
- starrockfarms.com83/100 · rank 617 · 6 pages
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.advocateslaw.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.