Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-10-04-2058
www.advocateslaw.com scan from 10/4/2026, 8:58:34 PM
Scan 2026-10-04-2058
Scanned 10/4/2026, 8:58:34 PM, finished 10/4/2026, 9:38:10 PM. Found with openstreetmap overpass
Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On October 4, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 497 pages and 953 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 22 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (64), meta descriptions (256), title tags (159); 4 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.5), title tags (−3.5). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 1 check was not run because the crawl fetched nothing for it. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 497
- Assets fetched
- 953
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 10 of 22
1,450 of 1,450 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 676 link destinations on other sites have not been checked.
- Title tags159 issues159 of 382 pages have title issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−3.5 points
- Meta descriptions256 issues256 of 382 pages have meta description issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−4.5 points
- Headings3 issues3 of 382 pages have heading issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Broken links7 issues77 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.−0.3 points
- Links to other sitesNot checkedNot checked: the crawl fetched nothing this check can look at.
- Redirects42 issues42 redirecting URLs, 15 of them chained.−0.4 points
- Non-200 responses7 issues50 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 44 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.−0.2 points
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability44 issues44 of 402 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.−1 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 2182 image references have no alt attribute. 634 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets64 issues64 assets larger than 500 KB among 953 fetched assets.−6 points
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage107 issues9 sitemaps listing 282 URLs: 103 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.−1.4 points
- Internal link counts102 notedInternal link counts for 453 pages; 102 worth a look.
- Thin contentOK0 of 382 pages have fewer than 200 words. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate content7 issues1 group of pages with identical HTML.−0.1 points
- URL format15 noted15 of 497 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- Canonicals71 noted71 of 453 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives444 noted444 pages carry a robots directive; 9 carry none.
- Anchor text92 noted92 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure154 noted154 of 382 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length117 noted90 images over 100 KB; 27 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomalies3 noted3 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2069 sites, median 79%, average 78%
www.advocateslaw.com scores 83%, higher than 65% of the 2069 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsYour site has some issues that need fixing, particularly broken links, redirects, and title/meta description problems. Addressing these can improve user experience and SEO performance.
- 1
Fix Broken Links
Why: Broken links can harm user experience and SEO rankings.
How: Update or remove the links that lead to broken URLs.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Simplify Redirects
Why: Chained redirects slow down page loading and affect SEO.
How: Remove unnecessary redirects by linking directly to the final URL.
Checks: redirects
- 3
Resolve Non-200 Responses
Why: URLs returning errors can harm accessibility and user experience.
How: Fix or remove pages and assets that are not returning 2xx responses.
Checks: status-codes
- 4
Improve Title Tags
Why: Titles impact click-through rates and SEO visibility.
How: Modify short, duplicate, or overly long titles to fit best practices.
Checks: titles
- 5
Enhance Meta Descriptions
Why: Meta descriptions influence search engine results and user clicks.
How: Draft unique meta descriptions for missing or duplicated ones.
Evidence: 124 pages have no meta description at all.
124 pages affected
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ads/dog-bite/
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ads/motor-vehicle-accident/
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/auburn/auburn-dog-bite-attorney/
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/auburn/auburn-motorcycle-accident-lawyer/
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/auburn/auburn-pedestrian-accident-attorney/
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 6
Optimize Heavy Assets
Why: Large files can slow down page load times.
How: Compress or resize heavy images to enhance performance.
Evidence: 715 KB of image, loaded by 3 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.
3 pages affected
Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.
Checks: heavy-assets
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe website lacks essential security headers and is using a vulnerable version of jQuery. Immediate fixes include adding security headers like HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, and upgrading jQuery to mitigate potential exploitation risks. Additionally, sensitive paths in robots.txt need access control.
- 0 high
- 4 medium
- 2 low
- 0 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors could be intercepted when accessing the site via HTTP.
Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to server response headers.
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium
Why it matters: No CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts and other resources, increasing XSS risks.
Fix: Add 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' to server response headers.
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 3
Missing Clickjacking Protection (X-Frame-Options)Medium
Why it matters: Absence of X-Frame-Options exposes the site to clickjacking attacks.
Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to server response headers.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 4
Vulnerable JavaScript Library (jQuery 3.1.3)Medium
Why it matters: This outdated version has known vulnerabilities which may be exploitable.
Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0 to fix vulnerabilities.
Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries
- 5
Missing MIME Sniffing Protection (X-Content-Type-Options)Low
Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files in unintended ways.
Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to server response headers.
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 6
Missing Referrer PolicyLow
Why it matters: No referrer policy means full page URLs are sent to third-party sites, risking privacy.
Fix: Add 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer' to server response headers.
Evidence: Referrer policy
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 453 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
- FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium
1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.3. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.
- jQuery 3.1.3 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
- NoteSoftware version disclosure
Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.
- server: cloudflare (1450 responses)
- x-powered-by: WP Engine (495 responses)
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
- widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
- OKHTTPS
All 453 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKCookie flags
All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- decadentbrulee.ca84/100 · rank 536 · 1 page
- korremechanical.com84/100 · rank 536 · 136 pages
- mergedeck.com84/100 · rank 536 · 200 pages
- www.ramsayanimalclinic.ca83/100 · rank 626 · 66 pages
- www.immigration-nation.ca83/100 · rank 626 · 1,926 pages
- www.glamorgandental.ca83/100 · rank 626 · 120 pages
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.advocateslaw.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.