Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-10-04-1841

www.advocateslaw.com scan from 10/4/2026, 6:41:56 PM

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.advocateslaw.com.

Scan 2026-10-04-1841

Scanned 10/4/2026, 6:41:56 PM, finished 10/4/2026, 7:24:26 PM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On October 4, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 497 pages and 953 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 22 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (64), meta descriptions (256), title tags (159); 4 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.5), title tags (−3.5). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 1 check was not run because the crawl fetched nothing for it. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
497
Assets fetched
953
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 22
CoverageComplete crawl

1,450 of 1,450 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 676 link destinations on other sites have not been checked.

  • Title tags159 issues
    159 of 382 pages have title issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Meta descriptions256 issues
    256 of 382 pages have meta description issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.5 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 382 pages have heading issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links7 issues
    77 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sitesNot checked
    Not checked: the crawl fetched nothing this check can look at.
  • Redirects42 issues
    42 redirecting URLs, 15 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses7 issues
    50 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 44 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability44 issues
    44 of 402 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.
    −1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2182 image references have no alt attribute. 634 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets64 issues
    64 assets larger than 500 KB among 953 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage107 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 282 URLs: 103 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.4 points
  • Internal link counts102 noted
    Internal link counts for 453 pages; 102 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 382 pages have fewer than 200 words. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content7 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format15 noted
    15 of 497 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals71 noted
    71 of 453 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives444 noted
    444 pages carry a robots directive; 9 carry none.
  • Anchor text92 noted
    92 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure154 noted
    154 of 382 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length117 noted
    90 images over 100 KB; 27 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies3 noted
    3 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2066 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.advocateslaw.com scores 83%, higher than 66% of the 2066 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0511020%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 2 sites37%: 2 sites38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 1 site42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 3 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 7 sites55%: 7 sites56%: 6 sites57%: 11 sites58%: 15 sites59%: 7 sites60%: 12 sites61%: 9 sites62%: 18 sites63%: 18 sites64%: 19 sites65%: 36 sites66%: 25 sites67%: 38 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 30 sites70%: 36 sites71%: 62 sites72%: 66 sites73%: 57 sites74%: 59 sites75%: 77 sites76%: 75 sites77%: 85 sites78%: 97 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 102 sites81%: 101 sites82%: 100 sites83%: 89 sites84%: 90 sites85%: 68 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 64 sites88%: 67 sites89%: 48 sites90%: 37 sites91%: 40 sites92%: 24 sites93%: 19 sites94%: 14 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 5 sites97%: 9 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 1 site100%: 57 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has several opportunities for improvement, including addressing broken links and optimizing meta descriptions. The recommendations below will enhance usability and SEO effectiveness.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links negatively impact user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify the broken URLs listed and update or remove the links from the relevant pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirect Chains

    Why: Chained redirects can slow site performance and confuse search engines.

    How: Streamline the redirects by pointing directly to the final destination URL.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Many pages lack effective meta descriptions, which can reduce click-through rates.

    How: Add unique meta descriptions to the 124 pages listed as missing, and adjust the shared descriptions on 20 pages.

    Evidence: 124 pages have no meta description at all.

    124 pages affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can hinder indexing and user access.

    How: Examine the URLs returning non-200 responses and fix or redirect them appropriately.

    Checks: status-codes

  5. 5

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets slow down page load times, affecting user experience and rankings.

    How: Compress or resize the 64 assets over 500 KB listed, ensuring accessibility remains intact.

    Evidence: 715 KB of image, loaded by 3 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    3 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Review and Fix Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Sitemap issues can prevent search engines from indexing all important pages.

    How: Update the sitemap to include the 103 missing pages and fix broken or redirecting URLs.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security issues that should be addressed to enhance protection for your visitors and your data. Most notably, the absence of essential response headers like HSTS and CSP puts your site at risk for attacks. Addressing these findings will improve overall security.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, a visitor can be intercepted when accessing the site over HTTP instead of HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: No CSP means scripts can load from any source, increasing the risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, your pages can be embedded in another site, which may lead to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: The use of jQuery 3.1.3 has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff, browsers may incorrectly execute files as scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a referrer-policy, sensitive URL data can be leaked when visitors navigate away from your site.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    No Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Lack of a permissions policy may allow injected scripts to access browser features like geolocation.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: (none)

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 453 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.3. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.1.3 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (1450 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (495 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 453 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.advocateslaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.advocateslaw.com scan 2026-10-04-1841 | DIY SEO Hub