Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-09-30-1833
www.advocateslaw.com scan from 9/30/2026, 6:33:26 PM
Scan 2026-09-30-1833
Scanned 9/30/2026, 6:33:26 PM, finished 9/30/2026, 7:09:40 PM. Found with openstreetmap overpass
Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 30, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 496 pages and 953 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 16 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (64), meta descriptions (256), title tags (158); 4 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.5), title tags (−3.5). 1 check found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 496
- Assets fetched
- 953
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 11 of 16
1,449 of 1,449 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 373 left unchecked.
- Title tags158 issues158 of 381 pages have title issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−3.5 points
- Meta descriptions256 issues256 of 381 pages have meta description issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−4.5 points
- Headings3 issues3 of 381 pages have heading issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Broken links7 issues77 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.−0.3 points
- Links to other sites5 issues5 destinations answered with an error, 38 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 373 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.−0.4 points
- Redirects42 issues42 redirecting URLs, 15 of them chained.−0.4 points
- Non-200 responses7 issues50 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 44 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.−0.2 points
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability44 issues44 of 401 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.−1 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 2177 image references have no alt attribute. 632 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets64 issues64 assets larger than 500 KB among 953 fetched assets.−6 points
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage107 issues9 sitemaps listing 281 URLs: 103 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.−1.4 points
- Internal link countsOKInternal link counts for 452 pages.
- Thin contentOK0 of 381 pages have fewer than 200 words. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate content7 issues1 group of pages with identical HTML.−0.1 points
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
1388 sites, median 80%, average 79%
www.advocateslaw.com scores 83%, higher than 62% of the 1388 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsThe website has several issues requiring attention, primarily involving broken links, redirects, and problems with meta descriptions. Prioritizing fixes will help improve user experience and SEO performance.
- 1
Fix Broken Links
Why: Broken links hinder user experience and harm SEO rankings.
How: Update or remove the links pointing to the broken URLs listed in the findings.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Simplify Redirects
Why: Chained redirects slow down loading times and confuse users.
How: Reduce chained redirects to one direct link for the listed URLs.
Checks: redirects
- 3
Address Non-200 Responses
Why: More than 50 URLs failing to return a 2xx response can hurt indexing.
How: Analyze and resolve the errors for listed URLs to ensure they return correct status codes.
Checks: status-codes
- 4
Improve Meta Descriptions
Why: Over 250 pages lack proper meta descriptions, affecting click-through rates.
How: Create unique meta descriptions for the listed pages using clear, engaging language.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 5
Optimize Heavy Assets
Why: Large assets can slow down page load times significantly.
How: Compress the large images or files, or consider lazy loading them.
Checks: heavy-assets
- 6
Fix Duplicate Content
Why: Identical content across multiple pages can negatively impact SEO.
How: Choose a canonical URL for the duplicate content and implement redirects as necessary.
Checks: duplicate-content
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlYour website has multiple security headers missing, including HSTS and CSP, which can expose visitors to various attacks. Additionally, an outdated JavaScript library poses potential risks. Implementing the suggested measures will enhance your site's protection.
- 0 high
- 4 medium
- 2 low
- 0 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors may be intercepted on initial non-HTTPS requests.
Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to your HTTP response headers.
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium
Why it matters: No CSP means scripts can run from any source, increasing XSS risk.
Fix: Implement a CSP header like 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' to restrict sources.
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 3
Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium
Why it matters: Lack of protection allows clickjacking by embedding your pages in malicious frames.
Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' or 'X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN' to the response headers.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 4
Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium
Why it matters: The use of jQuery 3.1.2 has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited based on your site’s usage.
Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later to close these vulnerabilities.
Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries
- 5
Missing X-Content-Type-Options for MIME SniffingLow
Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may treat files incorrectly based on their content.
Fix: Include 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' in your HTTP response headers.
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 6
Missing Referrer PolicyLow
Why it matters: Not using a referrer policy can unintentionally share the full URL, including sensitive data.
Fix: Add 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer' or a more suitable option to your HTTP response.
Evidence: Referrer policy
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 452 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
- FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium
1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.2. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.
- jQuery 3.1.2 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
- NoteSoftware version disclosure
Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.
- server: cloudflare (1449 responses)
- x-powered-by: WP Engine (494 responses)
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
- widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
- OKHTTPS
All 452 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKCookie flags
All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- decadentbrulee.ca84/100 · rank 399 · 1 page
- korremechanical.com84/100 · rank 399 · 136 pages
- mergedeck.com84/100 · rank 399 · 200 pages
- www.brightondentalstudio.com83/100 · rank 460 · 110 pages
- nexentirerebates.com83/100 · rank 460 · 25 pages
- www.beddingtondentalclinic.com83/100 · rank 460 · 158 pages
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.advocateslaw.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.