Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-09-29-2106
www.advocateslaw.com scan from 9/29/2026, 9:06:49 PM
Scan 2026-09-29-2106
Scanned 9/29/2026, 9:06:49 PM, finished 9/29/2026, 9:43:13 PM. Found with openstreetmap overpass
Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 29, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 494 pages and 953 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 16 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (70), meta descriptions (254), title tags (158); 4 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.5), title tags (−3.5). 1 check found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 494
- Assets fetched
- 953
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 11 of 16
1,447 of 1,447 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 371 left unchecked.
- Title tags158 issues158 of 379 pages have title issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−3.5 points
- Meta descriptions254 issues254 of 379 pages have meta description issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−4.5 points
- Headings3 issues3 of 379 pages have heading issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Broken links7 issues78 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.−0.3 points
- Links to other sites5 issues5 destinations answered with an error, 38 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 371 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.−0.4 points
- Redirects42 issues42 redirecting URLs, 15 of them chained.−0.4 points
- Non-200 responses7 issues50 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 44 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.−0.2 points
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability44 issues44 of 399 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.−1 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 2175 image references have no alt attribute. 632 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets70 issues70 assets larger than 500 KB among 953 fetched assets.−6 points
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage105 issues9 sitemaps listing 281 URLs: 101 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.−1.4 points
- Internal link countsOKInternal link counts for 450 pages.
- Thin contentOK0 of 379 pages have fewer than 200 words. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate content7 issues1 group of pages with identical HTML.−0.1 points
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
1366 sites, median 80%, average 79%
www.advocateslaw.com scores 83%, higher than 62% of the 1366 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsThe site has several issues that need attention, primarily broken links, redirects, title tags, and meta descriptions. Addressing these will significantly improve site health and user experience.
- 1
Fix Broken Links
Why: 78 internal links lead to broken URLs, affecting user experience and SEO.
How: Update the internal links to point to the correct URLs or remove them if obsolete.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Simplify Redirects
Why: 42 redirecting URLs, including 15 chained ones, slow down page loading and waste resources.
How: Eliminate unnecessary redirects and consolidate them so each URL has a single redirect to the final destination URL.
Checks: redirects
- 3
Address Title Issues
Why: 158 pages have title issues, negatively impacting search visibility and click-through rates.
How: Review and update titles to ensure they are unique, descriptive, and within 50-60 characters.
Checks: titles
- 4
Improve Meta Descriptions
Why: 254 pages have meta description issues, which can lower click-through rates from search results.
How: Craft unique meta descriptions for the pages identified with missing descriptions; use task IDs to guide creation.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 5
Review Heavy Assets
Why: 70 assets over 500 KB can slow site load times, impacting user experience and SEO.
How: Compress large images to reduce size without quality loss; consider removing unnecessary large files from webpages.
Checks: heavy-assets
- 6
Fix Sitemap Coverage
Why: 101 crawled pages are missing from the sitemap, affecting indexation.
How: Update the sitemap to include all relevant URLs, ensuring no broken URLs are listed.
Checks: sitemap-coverage
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlYour website has several security headers missing that could leave it vulnerable to various attacks. Key improvements include implementing HTTP Strict Transport Security and a Content Security Policy. Additionally, consider updating outdated JavaScript libraries to avoid potential exploits.
- 0 high
- 4 medium
- 2 low
- 0 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, users’ connections can be intercepted when they type your address without HTTPS.
Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
No Content Security Policy (CSP) in placeMedium
Why it matters: Without a CSP, the site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.
Fix: Add a header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self';
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 3
Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium
Why it matters: Lack of this header allows clickjacking, where attackers could overlay invisible controls.
Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 4
Outdated JavaScript Library DetectedMedium
Why it matters: jQuery 3.1.2 has known vulnerabilities which could potentially be exploited.
Fix: Update jQuery to version 3.5.0 or higher.
Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries
- 5
Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow
Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret file types.
Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 6
Missing Referrer PolicyLow
Why it matters: Without it, sensitive URL information is sent to external sites.
Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.
Evidence: Referrer policy
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 450 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
- FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium
1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.2. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.
- jQuery 3.1.2 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
- NoteSoftware version disclosure
Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.
- server: cloudflare (1447 responses)
- x-powered-by: WP Engine (492 responses)
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
- widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
- OKHTTPS
All 450 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKCookie flags
All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- decadentbrulee.ca84/100 · rank 397 · 1 page
- korremechanical.com84/100 · rank 397 · 136 pages
- mergedeck.com84/100 · rank 397 · 200 pages
- www.raxhon.com83/100 · rank 458 · 65 pages
- www.aspendigital.nl83/100 · rank 458 · 193 pages
- www.ramsayanimalclinic.ca83/100 · rank 458 · 66 pages
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.advocateslaw.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.