Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-09-28-1724

www.advocateslaw.com scan from 9/28/2026, 5:24:46 PM

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.advocateslaw.com.

Scan 2026-09-28-1724

Scanned 9/28/2026, 5:24:46 PM, finished 9/28/2026, 6:02:15 PM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 28, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 496 pages and 953 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 16 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (70), meta descriptions (256), title tags (158); 4 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.5), title tags (−3.5). 1 check found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
496
Assets fetched
953
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 16
CoverageComplete crawl

1,449 of 1,449 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 369 left unchecked.

  • Title tags158 issues
    158 of 381 pages have title issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Meta descriptions256 issues
    256 of 381 pages have meta description issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.5 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 381 pages have heading issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links7 issues
    77 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 39 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 369 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects42 issues
    42 redirecting URLs, 15 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses7 issues
    50 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 44 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability44 issues
    44 of 401 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.
    −1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2176 image references have no alt attribute. 632 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets70 issues
    70 assets larger than 500 KB among 953 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage107 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 281 URLs: 103 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.4 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 452 pages.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 381 pages have fewer than 200 words. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content7 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

1337 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.advocateslaw.com scores 83%, higher than 62% of the 1337 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

037730%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 1 site39%: 0 sites40%: 1 site41%: 0 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 0 sites45%: 2 sites46%: 2 sites47%: 2 sites48%: 2 sites49%: 2 sites50%: 3 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 6 sites53%: 5 sites54%: 5 sites55%: 4 sites56%: 3 sites57%: 5 sites58%: 9 sites59%: 5 sites60%: 8 sites61%: 10 sites62%: 14 sites63%: 11 sites64%: 8 sites65%: 14 sites66%: 14 sites67%: 26 sites68%: 24 sites69%: 14 sites70%: 32 sites71%: 29 sites72%: 37 sites73%: 33 sites74%: 41 sites75%: 38 sites76%: 49 sites77%: 45 sites78%: 57 sites79%: 48 sites80%: 66 sites81%: 73 sites82%: 67 sites83%: 61 sites84%: 61 sites85%: 45 sites86%: 49 sites87%: 48 sites88%: 49 sites89%: 36 sites90%: 28 sites91%: 31 sites92%: 18 sites93%: 8 sites94%: 10 sites95%: 5 sites96%: 7 sites97%: 3 sites98%: 1 site99%: 2 sites100%: 50 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Addressing broken links, redirects, and meta description issues will significantly improve user experience and SEO. Prioritizing fixes with the highest impact for the least effort is essential.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Eliminating broken links enhances user experience and SEO ranking.

    How: Identify and update/remove the 7 broken URLs on the site.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Reduce Redirects

    Why: Minimizing redirects improves site speed and user experience.

    How: Eliminate 15 chained redirects, making direct links where possible.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensuring pages return 2xx responses is crucial for SEO and accessibility.

    How: Fix the 7 URLs returning errors and ensure all pages are properly reachable.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Correct and unique title tags are vital for SEO and user engagement.

    How: Rewrite titles for 158 pages with issues, ensuring relevance and optimal length.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Proper meta descriptions can improve click-through rates significantly.

    How: Write unique meta descriptions for 124 missing and 15 duplicated entries.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Organize Sitemap

    Why: A well-structured sitemap improves site navigation and indexing.

    How: Fix 3 broken/redirecting sitemap URLs and include missing pages in the sitemap.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security vulnerabilities that need attention, mainly related to response headers and outdated JavaScript libraries. Implementing the recommended security headers can help enhance the protection of your site.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted when accessing your site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to your server response headers.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows potential injection of malicious scripts from anywhere.

    Fix: Include a header like 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'' to restrict content sources.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    No Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of X-Frame-Options allows your site to be framed, potentially leading to clickjacking.

    Fix: Set 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' in your HTTP headers to prevent this.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Outdated jQuery LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 3.1.2 contains known vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade to jQuery 3.5.0 or later to address these issues.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without X-Content-Type-Options, browsers might incorrectly execute files as scripts.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to your response headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    No Referrer Policy SetLow

    Why it matters: Absence of a referrer policy exposes user URLs when navigating away.

    Fix: Include 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer' to limit exposed information.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Without this policy, scripts could access sensitive browser features.

    Fix: Add 'Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=()' to limit feature access.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 452 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.2. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.1.2 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (1449 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (494 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 452 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.advocateslaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.advocateslaw.com scan 2026-09-28-1724 | DIY SEO Hub