Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-09-28-0543

www.advocateslaw.com scan from 9/28/2026, 5:43:18 AM

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.advocateslaw.com.

Scan 2026-09-28-0543

Scanned 9/28/2026, 5:43:18 AM, finished 9/28/2026, 6:20:31 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 28, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 496 pages and 953 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 16 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (63), meta descriptions (256), title tags (158); 4 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.5), title tags (−3.5). 1 check found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
496
Assets fetched
953
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 16
CoverageComplete crawl

1,449 of 1,449 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 369 left unchecked.

  • Title tags158 issues
    158 of 381 pages have title issues. 72 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Meta descriptions256 issues
    256 of 381 pages have meta description issues. 72 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.5 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 381 pages have heading issues. 72 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links7 issues
    82 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 38 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 369 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects41 issues
    41 redirecting URLs, 15 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses7 issues
    49 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 43 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability45 issues
    45 of 402 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.
    −1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2180 image references have no alt attribute. 632 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets63 issues
    63 assets larger than 500 KB among 953 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage107 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 281 URLs: 103 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.4 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 453 pages.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 381 pages have fewer than 200 words. 72 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content7 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

1323 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.advocateslaw.com scores 83%, higher than 62% of the 1323 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

037740%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 1 site39%: 0 sites40%: 0 sites41%: 0 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 0 sites45%: 2 sites46%: 2 sites47%: 2 sites48%: 2 sites49%: 2 sites50%: 3 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 6 sites53%: 5 sites54%: 5 sites55%: 4 sites56%: 3 sites57%: 5 sites58%: 9 sites59%: 5 sites60%: 8 sites61%: 10 sites62%: 13 sites63%: 11 sites64%: 8 sites65%: 14 sites66%: 14 sites67%: 26 sites68%: 25 sites69%: 14 sites70%: 30 sites71%: 29 sites72%: 36 sites73%: 33 sites74%: 41 sites75%: 36 sites76%: 48 sites77%: 45 sites78%: 57 sites79%: 46 sites80%: 65 sites81%: 74 sites82%: 68 sites83%: 60 sites84%: 59 sites85%: 45 sites86%: 51 sites87%: 45 sites88%: 50 sites89%: 35 sites90%: 28 sites91%: 31 sites92%: 19 sites93%: 8 sites94%: 10 sites95%: 5 sites96%: 7 sites97%: 3 sites98%: 1 site99%: 1 site100%: 49 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The crawl revealed several key issues impacting your site. Prioritize fixing broken links and redirect chains to improve user experience. Address title and meta description problems for better SEO. Optimize heavy assets to enhance site performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links can frustrate users and harm SEO. Addressing them improves site usability.

    How: Identify the broken URLs and update or remove them from linking pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirect Chains

    Why: Chained redirects can slow down page load times and confuse search engines. Simplifying them improves performance.

    How: Map out the redirects and update links to direct to the final URLs instead of multiple hops.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 158 pages have title issues, affecting SEO and click-through rates. Optimized titles can attract more visitors.

    How: Review the pages with title issues and create unique, descriptive titles that fit the guidelines.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Over 250 meta descriptions have issues. Fixing them can increase click-through rates from search results.

    How: Develop engaging, concise meta descriptions for pages lacking them or sharing duplicates.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow page loading speed, negatively impacting user experience and SEO rankings.

    How: Compress or resize images, especially those over 500 KB, to improve loading times.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Improve Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Missing pages in the sitemap can lead to indexing issues and missed opportunities for search traffic.

    How: Ensure all relevant pages are listed in your sitemap and address any that are broken or redirecting.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several critical security issues related to headers that protect against various vulnerabilities. It lacks HTTP Strict Transport Security, Content Security Policy, and protections against clickjacking, among others. Furthermore, the site uses an outdated version of jQuery with known vulnerabilities, which could be exploited depending on usage.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors typing without HTTPS can be intercepted.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestrained loading of scripts and resources, increasing risks of XSS.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without protection, your pages can be embedded in frames, risking clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Outdated jQuery Library with VulnerabilitiesMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 3.1.2 poses known risks, possibly making the site vulnerable.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or higher.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this, browsers may incorrectly execute files based on contents.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this policy, potentially sensitive URLs are shared with third parties.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Lack of this policy means potentially unused features remain accessible.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), camera=(), microphone=();

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 453 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.2. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.1.2 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (1449 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (494 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 453 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.advocateslaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.advocateslaw.com scan 2026-09-28-0543 | DIY SEO Hub