Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-09-19-0102
www.advocateslaw.com scan from 9/19/2026, 1:02:01 AM
A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.advocateslaw.com.
Scan 2026-09-19-0102
Scanned 9/19/2026, 1:02:01 AM, finished 9/19/2026, 1:39:49 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass
Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 19, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 491 pages and 948 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 14 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (170), meta descriptions (163), sitemap coverage (107); 4 checks passed. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 491
- Assets fetched
- 948
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 10 of 14
- Title tags170 issues170 of 404 pages have title issues. 43 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Meta descriptions163 issues163 of 404 pages have meta description issues. 43 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Headings4 issues4 of 404 pages have heading issues. 43 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Broken links7 issues77 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
- Redirects42 issues42 redirecting URLs, 15 of them chained.
- Non-200 responses7 issues50 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability24 issues24 of 412 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 35 pages noindex by design.
- Image alt textOK0 of 2147 image references have no alt attribute. 622 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets70 issues70 assets larger than 500 KB among the 100 heaviest.
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage107 issues9 sitemaps listing 304 URLs: 103 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
- Thin contentOK0 of 404 pages have fewer than 200 words. 43 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate content7 issues1 group of pages with identical HTML.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
1097 sites, median 82%, average 80%
www.advocateslaw.com scores 84%, higher than 57% of the 1097 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsYour site has a good health score, but there are critical issues to address, especially broken links and redirect chains, which can affect user experience and SEO. The priority fixes will enhance overall performance.
- 1
Fix Broken Links
Why: Broken links hurt user experience and SEO.
How: Identify and remove or update these links to point to working URLs.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Resolve Redirect Chains
Why: Chained redirects can slow down site performance.
How: Shorten chains by updating links to point directly to the final URL.
Checks: redirects
- 3
Address Non-200 Responses
Why: Non-200 status codes indicate issues that can harm access.
How: Check each URL for issues and update or remove them as necessary.
Checks: status-codes
- 4
Optimize Title Tags
Why: Improving title tags enhances click-through rates.
How: Ensure all pages have unique and relevant title tags under 60 characters.
Checks: titles
- 5
Improve Meta Descriptions
Why: Meta descriptions influence search visibility and click rates.
How: Write unique meta descriptions for missing ones, around 150-160 characters.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 6
Fix Indexability Issues
Why: Pages not indexed may not appear in search results.
How: Evaluate indexability warnings and adjust robots.txt or page settings.
Checks: indexability
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe website www.advocateslaw.com has multiple security issues including a lack of critical headers that protect against various attacks. The most pressing issues are the absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security and Content Security Policy, exposing the site to interception and script injection risks. Urgent action is needed to implement the recommended security headers and update vulnerable JavaScript libraries.
- 0 high
- 4 medium
- 2 low
- 0 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted on their first request without HTTPS, risking sensitive data exposure.
Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing Content Security PolicyMedium
Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows the loading of scripts and styles from any source, increasing the risk of cross-site scripting.
Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 3
Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium
Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, the site can be embedded in frames, exposing users to clickjacking attacks.
Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 4
Vulnerable JavaScript LibraryMedium
Why it matters: Using jQuery 3.1.2 can expose the site to known vulnerabilities including XSS attacks.
Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later to address reported vulnerabilities.
Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries
- 5
Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow
Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might execute files in unexpected ways, leading to security risks.
Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 6
Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow
Why it matters: Without a referrer policy, sensitive information is passed to external sites via referrer URLs.
Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer
Evidence: Referrer policy
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 447 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
- FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium
1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.2. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.
- jQuery 3.1.2 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
- NoteSoftware version disclosure
Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.
- server: cloudflare (1439 responses)
- x-powered-by: WP Engine (489 responses)
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
- widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
- OKHTTPS
All 447 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKCookie flags
All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its public pages. Anyone can run a scan of any site they own or are authorised to check. Is this your site? Claim it to manage the listing, or ask for removal through the support form.