Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-09-18-1043
www.advocateslaw.com scan from 9/18/2026, 10:43:02 AM
A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.advocateslaw.com.
Scan 2026-09-18-1043
Scanned 9/18/2026, 10:43:02 AM, finished 9/18/2026, 11:12:39 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass
Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 18, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 491 pages and 948 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 14 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (170), meta descriptions (163), sitemap coverage (107); 4 checks passed. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 491
- Assets fetched
- 948
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 10 of 14
- Title tags170 issues170 of 404 pages have title issues. 43 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Meta descriptions163 issues163 of 404 pages have meta description issues. 43 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Headings4 issues4 of 404 pages have heading issues. 43 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Broken links7 issues77 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
- Redirects42 issues42 redirecting URLs, 15 of them chained.
- Non-200 responses7 issues50 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability24 issues24 of 412 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 35 pages noindex by design.
- Image alt textOK0 of 2147 image references have no alt attribute. 622 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets64 issues64 assets larger than 500 KB among the 100 heaviest.
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage107 issues9 sitemaps listing 304 URLs: 103 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
- Thin contentOK0 of 404 pages have fewer than 200 words. 43 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate content7 issues1 group of pages with identical HTML.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
1086 sites, median 82%, average 80%
www.advocateslaw.com scores 84%, higher than 57% of the 1086 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsThe site has several technical issues that can hinder SEO performance. Key priorities include fixing broken links and optimizing title tags and meta descriptions for better visibility.
- 1
Fix Broken Links
Why: 77 internal links are broken, affecting user experience and SEO.
How: Identify and update or remove the broken links from your site.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Resolve Redirect Issues
Why: 42 URLs are redirecting, with 15 of them chained, slowing down site performance.
How: Eliminate unnecessary redirects and ensure that all redirects are direct.
Checks: redirects
- 3
Address Non-200 Responses
Why: 50 URLs do not return a 2xx response, which affects crawl efficiency.
How: Check the listed URLs and update or remove them as needed.
Checks: status-codes
- 4
Optimize Title Tags
Why: 170 pages have title issues; improving them can enhance click rates.
How: Review and edit title tags to be unique and within optimal length.
Checks: titles
- 5
Improve Meta Descriptions
Why: 163 pages have meta description issues, affecting search result visibility.
How: Craft compelling and unique meta descriptions for affected pages.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 6
Fix Heading Issues
Why: 4 pages have multiple H1 tags, which can confuse search engines.
How: Adjust heading structures to ensure only one H1 tag per page.
Checks: headings
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe site lacks several important security headers and is using an outdated JavaScript library with known vulnerabilities. Implementing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), a Content Security Policy (CSP), and other security headers is crucial to improve protection against attacks. Additionally, updating the jQuery library is necessary to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
- 0 high
- 4 medium
- 2 low
- 1 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: HSTS protects against man-in-the-middle attacks by enforcing HTTPS.
Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium
Why it matters: CSP restricts where resources can be loaded from, reducing risk of XSS attacks.
Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'.
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 3
Missing Clickjacking Protection (X-Frame-Options)Medium
Why it matters: Without this header, the site can be embedded in a frame, leading to clickjacking.
Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 4
Vulnerable JavaScript Library (jQuery 3.1.1)Medium
Why it matters: This version has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited.
Fix: Update jQuery to at least version 3.5.0.
Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries
- 5
Missing MIME Sniffing Protection (X-Content-Type-Options)Low
Why it matters: This header prevents browsers from interpreting files in unexpected ways.
Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 6
Missing Referrer PolicyLow
Why it matters: Without it, sensitive URLs may be leaked to third-party sites.
Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.
Evidence: Referrer policy
- 7
Missing Permissions PolicyInfo
Why it matters: This header limits features available to potentially harmful scripts.
Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: reduce-ux.
Evidence: Permissions policy
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 447 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
- FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium
1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.
- jQuery 3.1.1 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
- NoteSoftware version disclosure
Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.
- server: cloudflare (1439 responses)
- x-powered-by: WP Engine (489 responses)
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
- widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
- OKHTTPS
All 447 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKCookie flags
All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its public pages. Anyone can run a scan of any site they own or are authorised to check. Is this your site? Claim it to manage the listing, or ask for removal through the support form.