Scanned sites / workwithmiguel.com / 2026-10-19-2316
workwithmiguel.com scan from 2026-10-19 23:16:32 UTC DR 0
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-10-19-2316
Scanned 2026-10-19 23:16:32 UTC, finished 2026-10-19 23:17:47 UTC
Site: https://workwithmiguel.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On October 19, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 5 pages and 50 assets of workwithmiguel.com, starting from https://workwithmiguel.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 3 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (5), meta descriptions (3), thin content (1); 27 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−10), meta descriptions (−4.8), thin content (−1.6). 3 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium1 medium finding. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 5
- Assets fetched
- 50
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 3 of 33
55 of 55 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 4 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags5 issues5 of 5 pages have title issues.−10 points
- Meta descriptions3 issues3 of 5 pages have meta description issues.−4.8 points
- HeadingsOK0 of 5 pages have heading issues.
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sitesOK0 destinations answered with an error, of 4 destinations checked.
- RedirectsOK0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
- Non-200 responsesOK0 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- IndexabilityOK0 of 5 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
- Image alt textOK0 of 11 image references have no alt attribute.
- Heavy assetsOK0 assets larger than 500 KB among 50 fetched assets.
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverageOK1 sitemap listing 5 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
- Internal link countsOKInternal link counts for 5 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
- Thin content1 issue1 of 5 pages have fewer than 200 words.−1.6 points
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL formatOKAll 5 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
- CanonicalsOK0 of 5 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directivesOKNo page carries a robots directive; all 5 pages are open to search engines.
- Anchor textOKEvery internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
- Title and heading structure3 noted3 of 5 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
- Image weight and alt length4 noted4 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomaliesOKNo redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
- HTML and head validationOKAll 5 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
- hreflangOKNo page declares hreflang.
- Structured dataOKNo page carries structured data (5 indexable pages checked).
- Near duplicatesOKNo near duplicates among 5 pages with enough text to compare.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 5 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsOK0 of 5 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
- PaginationOKNo page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 55 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 5 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed InsightsNot checkedNot checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
- Spelling1 noted1 word an English dictionary does not know, on 1 page. Product names and jargon will appear here too.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2291 sites, median 79%, average 78%
workwithmiguel.com scores 84%, higher than 69% of the 2291 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsYour site health is good, but there are improvements needed in titles, meta descriptions, and content. Focus on updating these for better SEO performance.
- 1
Update Title Tags
Why: All pages have short titles, affecting search visibility.
How: Revise title tags to be 30-60 characters long and include main keywords.
Checks: titles
- 2
Improve Meta Descriptions
Why: Some meta descriptions are too short, and one may be cut off in search results.
How: Ensure all descriptions are up to 160 characters and highlight key content.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 3
Enhance Content Length
Why: One page has thin content, which may harm its ranking.
How: Add valuable content to reach at least 200 words on the thin content page.
Checks: thin-content
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe site workwithmiguel.com has a Content-Security-Policy that diminishes its security by allowing inline and eval scripts. Adjusting this can significantly enhance protection against script injections.
- 0 high
- 1 medium
- 0 low
- 0 info
- 1
Weak Content Security PolicyMedium
Why it matters: The CSP allows 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval', reducing its effectiveness against XSS attacks.
Fix: Update the `script-src` directive by removing 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval'. Consider using nonce-based approaches for scripts.
Evidence: Content Security Policy
What the checks found
- NoteContent Security Policy
A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.
- https://workwithmiguel.com/ → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; frame-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.facebook.com; upgrade-insecure-requests; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://static.cloudflareinsights.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.go
- https://workwithmiguel.com/speak → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; frame-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.facebook.com; upgrade-insecure-requests; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://static.cloudflareinsights.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.go
- https://workwithmiguel.com/work → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; frame-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.facebook.com; upgrade-insecure-requests; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://static.cloudflareinsights.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.go
- https://workwithmiguel.com/privacy → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; frame-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.facebook.com; upgrade-insecure-requests; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://static.cloudflareinsights.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.go
- https://workwithmiguel.com/terms → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; frame-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.facebook.com; upgrade-insecure-requests; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://static.cloudflareinsights.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.go
13 checks passed, 2 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 5 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKHTTP Strict Transport Security
strict-transport-security is set on all 5 HTML pages.
- OKClickjacking protection
x-frame-options is set on all 5 HTML pages.
- OKMIME sniffing protection
x-content-type-options is set on all 5 HTML pages.
- OKReferrer policy
referrer-policy is set on all 5 HTML pages.
- OKPermissions policy
permissions-policy is set on all 5 HTML pages.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- OKThird-party scripts
Scripts from 1 other domain all carry Subresource Integrity hashes.
- OKSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.
- Not applicableCookie flags
The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.
- Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries
No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near workwithmiguel.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- fungwee.fusenv.comDR 4285/100 · rank 513 · 34 pages
- www.lakewooddentalclinic.comDR 584/100 · rank 596 · 101 pages
- www.heritageparkdental.caDR 584/100 · rank 596 · 96 pages
- www.beddingtondentalclinic.comDR 784/100 · rank 596 · 161 pages
- ahrefs.comDR 9184/100 · rank 596 · 4,947 pages
- tuscanydental.comDR 584/100 · rank 596 · 77 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling workwithmiguel.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own workwithmiguel.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming workwithmiguel.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.