Scanned sites / workwithmiguel.com

SEO report for workwithmiguel.com DR 0

The latest Site Spider scan of workwithmiguel.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/workwithmiguel-com/2026-10-19-2316.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-10-19 23:16:32 UTC, finished 2026-10-19 23:17:47 UTC

Site: https://workwithmiguel.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

84/ 100Good

On October 19, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 5 pages and 50 assets of workwithmiguel.com, starting from https://workwithmiguel.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 3 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (5), meta descriptions (3), thin content (1); 27 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−10), meta descriptions (−4.8), thin content (−1.6). 3 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium finding. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
5
Assets fetched
50
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
3 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

55 of 55 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 4 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags5 issues
    5 of 5 pages have title issues.
    −10 points
  • Meta descriptions3 issues
    3 of 5 pages have meta description issues.
    −4.8 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 5 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sitesOK
    0 destinations answered with an error, of 4 destinations checked.
  • RedirectsOK
    0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responsesOK
    0 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 5 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 11 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 50 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    1 sitemap listing 5 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 5 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 5 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −1.6 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 5 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 5 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 5 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure3 noted
    3 of 5 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length4 noted
    4 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 5 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    No page carries structured data (5 indexable pages checked).
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 5 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 5 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsOK
    0 of 5 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 55 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 5 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling1 noted
    1 word an English dictionary does not know, on 1 page. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2291 sites, median 79%, average 78%

workwithmiguel.com scores 84%, higher than 69% of the 2291 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 7 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 41 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 67 sites74%: 70 sites75%: 71 sites76%: 88 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 105 sites79%: 87 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 107 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 95 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 83 sites86%: 68 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 35 sites93%: 21 sites94%: 14 sites95%: 10 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 10 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 0 sites100%: 70 sites84% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site health is good, but there are improvements needed in titles, meta descriptions, and content. Focus on updating these for better SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Update Title Tags

    Why: All pages have short titles, affecting search visibility.

    How: Revise title tags to be 30-60 characters long and include main keywords.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Some meta descriptions are too short, and one may be cut off in search results.

    How: Ensure all descriptions are up to 160 characters and highlight key content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Enhance Content Length

    Why: One page has thin content, which may harm its ranking.

    How: Add valuable content to reach at least 200 words on the thin content page.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site workwithmiguel.com has a Content-Security-Policy that diminishes its security by allowing inline and eval scripts. Adjusting this can significantly enhance protection against script injections.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 0 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Weak Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: The CSP allows 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval', reducing its effectiveness against XSS attacks.

    Fix: Update the `script-src` directive by removing 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval'. Consider using nonce-based approaches for scripts.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

What the checks found

  • NoteContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.

    • https://workwithmiguel.com/ → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; frame-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.facebook.com; upgrade-insecure-requests; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://static.cloudflareinsights.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.go
    • https://workwithmiguel.com/speak → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; frame-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.facebook.com; upgrade-insecure-requests; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://static.cloudflareinsights.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.go
    • https://workwithmiguel.com/work → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; frame-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.facebook.com; upgrade-insecure-requests; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://static.cloudflareinsights.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.go
    • https://workwithmiguel.com/privacy → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; frame-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.facebook.com; upgrade-insecure-requests; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://static.cloudflareinsights.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.go
    • https://workwithmiguel.com/terms → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; frame-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.facebook.com; upgrade-insecure-requests; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://static.cloudflareinsights.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.go
13 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 5 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 5 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 5 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 5 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 5 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 5 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    Scripts from 1 other domain all carry Subresource Integrity hashes.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of workwithmiguel.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near workwithmiguel.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling workwithmiguel.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own workwithmiguel.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming workwithmiguel.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.