Scanned sites / winnipegroofers.com

SEO report for winnipegroofers.com DR 1

The latest Site Spider scan of winnipegroofers.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/winnipegroofers-com/2026-09-13-0217.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 02:17:14 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 02:37:09 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://winnipegroofers.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

96/ 100Excellent

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 164 pages and 252 assets of winnipegroofers.com, starting from https://winnipegroofers.com/. It scored 96 out of 100, an excellent result. 7 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by redirects (33), meta descriptions (17), title tags (9); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−1), redirects (−1), title tags (−0.7). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
164
Assets fetched
252
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

416 of 416 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 5 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags9 issues
    9 of 130 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Meta descriptions17 issues
    17 of 130 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −1 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 130 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites393 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 5 destinations checked.
  • Redirects33 issues
    33 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1 points
  • Non-200 responses36 noted
    36 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 33 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 131 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.2 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 608 image references have no alt attribute. 19 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 252 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage3 issues
    1 sitemap listing 128 URLs: 3 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.1 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 131 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 130 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 164 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 131 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives131 noted
    131 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure6 noted
    6 of 130 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length25 noted
    25 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 131 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 416 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 131 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2347 sites, median 79%, average 78%

winnipegroofers.com scores 96%, higher than 96% of the 2347 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 102 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 66 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 17 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites96% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site's health is excellent, but there are a few SEO enhancements needed, including redirect fixes, status code issues, and optimizing title tags. Addressing these will improve visibility and performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Reduce unnecessary redirects to improve page load speed and user experience.

    How: Update internal links to point directly to the final URLs instead of redirecting.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensure all URLs return a 2xx response for better indexing.

    How: Replace or remove broken links and fix the misconfigured URLs that return errors.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improve page relevance and SERP visibility with concise titles.

    How: Revise the 9 pages with title issues to align with SEO best practices (30-60 characters).

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Revise Meta Descriptions

    Why: Enhance click-through rates with appropriate meta descriptions.

    How: Edit the 14 pages with meta description issues to fit within 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: Maintain proper heading structure for better SEO.

    How: Edit the 2 pages to ensure each has a single H1 tag with relevant content.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Improve Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Ensure all relevant pages are indexed and discoverable.

    How: Add missing pages to the sitemap and submit the updated version to search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website winnipegroofers.com lacks important security measures. Key concerns include the absence of a Content Security Policy, which exposes the site to XSS risks, and the use of an outdated version of jQuery that may contain vulnerabilities. Proper security headers and library updates are recommended for better protection.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is at risk of XSS and data injection attacks.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header, e.g., "Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'".

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: The website uses jQuery 1.8.3, which has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0 to mitigate these vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  3. 3

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Absence of this header can lead to MIME type confusion and potential script execution attacks.

    Fix: Add the header "X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff" to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 131 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://winnipegroofers.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/home/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/about-us/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/about-us/reviews/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/roofing-services-list/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/roofing-services-list/hail-and-storm-damage-roof-repair/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/roofing-services-list/residential-roofer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/roofing-services-list/roof-inspection/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/roofing-services-list/roof-leak-repair/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/roofing-services-list/roof-maintenance/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/roofing-services-list/roof-repair/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://winnipegroofers.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/home/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/about-us/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/about-us/reviews/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/roofing-services-list/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/roofing-services-list/hail-and-storm-damage-roof-repair/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/roofing-services-list/residential-roofer/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/roofing-services-list/roof-inspection/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/roofing-services-list/roof-leak-repair/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/roofing-services-list/roof-maintenance/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegroofers.com/roofing-services-list/roof-repair/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.8.3. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.8.3 in https://winnipegroofers.com/wp-content/themes/rfr6/scripts/jquery.min.js: CVE-2012-6708 (selector XSS), CVE-2015-9251, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023; fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • kit.fontawesome.com (40 script tags)
    • form.jotform.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 131 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 131 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 131 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    No Server or X-Powered-By header is sent.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of winnipegroofers.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near winnipegroofers.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling winnipegroofers.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own winnipegroofers.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming winnipegroofers.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.