Scanned sites / bombeo.it

SEO report for bombeo.it DR 4

The latest Site Spider scan of bombeo.it, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/bombeo-it/2026-10-21-0919.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-10-21 09:19:21 UTC, finished 2026-10-21 10:37:09 UTC

Site: https://bombeo.it/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

95/ 100Excellent

On October 21, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 1246 pages and 249 assets of bombeo.it, starting from https://bombeo.it/. It scored 95 out of 100, an excellent result. 6 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by sitemap coverage (514), redirects (210), orphan pages (210); 17 checks passed. Most of the points went to sitemap coverage (−3), redirects (−0.8), orphan pages (−0.8). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 3 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
1246
Assets fetched
249
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
6 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

1,495 of 1,660 discovered URLs were fetched, 165 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 20 left unchecked.

  • Title tagsOK
    0 of 0 pages have title issues. 1028 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Meta descriptionsOK
    0 of 0 pages have meta description issues. 1028 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 0 pages have heading issues. 1028 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links8 issues
    35 internal links point at 8 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites3,771 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 291 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 20 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
  • Redirects210 issues
    211 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.8 points
  • Non-200 responses8 issues
    220 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 218 of them are pages, 8 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 0 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1028 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 14850 image references have no alt attribute. 12923 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 249 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages210 issues
    210 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.8 points
  • Sitemap coverage514 issues
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://bombeo.it/sitemap.xml (301), https://bombeo.it/wp-sitemap.xml (404). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3 points
  • Internal link counts500 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 500 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 0 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1028 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content2 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1,137 noted
    1137 of 1246 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals920 noted
    920 of 1028 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives1,028 noted
    1028 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text445 noted
    445 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 0 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1028 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length12 noted
    12 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validation1,027 noted
    1027 of 1027 pages have HTML problems: 1027 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    1008 of 0 indexable pages carry structured data: Event (1008), Offer (1008). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 0 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 1028 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsOK
    0 of 0 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination916 noted
    916 pages in pagination sequences; 916 with problems.
  • Headers and cookies1 noted
    1 cookie set by the site, 1 missing a protective flag; 14 response headers recorded across 1495 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 1028 pages; 981 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingOK
    No unfamiliar lower-case words on 0 pages (English pages only).

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2331 sites, median 79%, average 78%

bombeo.it scores 95%, higher than 95% of the 2331 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites95% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The site has a good health score, but several issues need attention. Prioritize resolving broken links, establishing a sitemap, and addressing orphaned pages for optimal user experience and SEO.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 35 broken internal links harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify whether destinations were deleted on purpose; if so, remove links. Otherwise, redirect links to relevant pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Create Sitemap

    Why: No sitemap found, which can hinder search engine indexing.

    How: Generate a sitemap and place it at /sitemap.xml. Alternatively, update robots.txt to include sitemap location.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  3. 3

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: 210 pages with no internal links risk being ignored by search engines.

    How: Link orphaned pages within your site to improve visibility and accessibility.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  4. 4

    Resolve Non-200 Status Codes

    Why: 220 URLs returning non-200 responses can affect site accessibility and crawlability.

    How: Investigate the status codes; fix or remove problematic URLs to ensure they return 2xx responses.

    Checks: status-codes

  5. 5

    Eliminate Duplicate Content

    Why: Duplicate content can mislead search engines, affecting ranking.

    How: Implement canonical tags or revise content to ensure unique pages.

    Checks: duplicate-content

  6. 6

    Evaluate Redirects

    Why: 211 redirects may impact site performance and user experience.

    How: Audit and streamline redirects, ensuring they point to the most relevant and accurate destinations.

    Checks: redirects

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security issues that could expose it to risks. Key problems include missing important headers for security and exposing sensitive information. Implementing these recommendations will strengthen your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 3 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted by an attacker when navigating to your site via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of X-Frame-Options or CSP leaves your pages vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Cookie Protections MissingMedium

    Why it matters: Your cookies lack attributes that prevent access by JavaScript and ensure secure transmission.

    Fix: Set cookies with the flags: HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite=Lax.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  4. 4

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed API key can be misused if not correctly restricted, potentially leading to credit usage.

    Fix: Restrict this key in the Google Cloud console to your domain's HTTP referrer.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without X-Content-Type-Options, browsers may incorrectly interpret files, leading to security risks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a Referrer-Policy, sensitive URL information is sent to other sites, compromising privacy.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Third-party Scripts Without IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from other domains may be compromised, altering your site’s functionality.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) or a content security policy specifying trusted domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  8. 8

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Lacking a Permissions-Policy may allow unnecessary access to browser features for third-party scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=().

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  9. 9

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Publicly listed paths in robots.txt can expose sensitive areas to probing.

    Fix: Restrict access to these paths with proper authentication mechanisms.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://bombeo.it/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://bombeo.it/eventi/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://bombeo.it/calendario/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://bombeo.it/come-funziona/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://bombeo.it/regolamento/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://bombeo.it/luoghi-di-partenza/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://bombeo.it/chi-siamo/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://bombeo.it/faq/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://bombeo.it/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://bombeo.it/contatti/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://bombeo.it/my-account/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://bombeo.it/eventi/categoria/spetacoli/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 1028 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://bombeo.it/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://bombeo.it/eventi/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://bombeo.it/calendario/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://bombeo.it/come-funziona/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://bombeo.it/regolamento/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://bombeo.it/luoghi-di-partenza/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://bombeo.it/chi-siamo/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://bombeo.it/faq/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://bombeo.it/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://bombeo.it/contatti/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://bombeo.it/eventi/categoria/spetacoli/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://bombeo.it/eventi/categoria/altri-eventi/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://bombeo.it/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://bombeo.it/eventi/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://bombeo.it/calendario/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://bombeo.it/come-funziona/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://bombeo.it/regolamento/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://bombeo.it/luoghi-di-partenza/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://bombeo.it/chi-siamo/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://bombeo.it/faq/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://bombeo.it/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://bombeo.it/contatti/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://bombeo.it/my-account/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://bombeo.it/eventi/categoria/spetacoli/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://bombeo.it/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/eventi/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/calendario/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/come-funziona/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/regolamento/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/luoghi-di-partenza/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/chi-siamo/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/faq/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/blog/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/contatti/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/my-account/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/eventi/categoria/spetacoli/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://bombeo.it/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/eventi/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/calendario/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/come-funziona/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/regolamento/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/luoghi-di-partenza/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/chi-siamo/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/faq/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/blog/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/contatti/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/my-account/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://bombeo.it/eventi/categoria/spetacoli/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    1 of 1 cookie are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • backend-port (set by https://bombeo.it/) lacks Secure, SameSite
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…OU (39 chars) in https://bombeo.it/event/il-cilento-2/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • connect.facebook.net (27 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
7 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 1028 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 1028 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    88 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of bombeo.it

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near bombeo.it

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling bombeo.it from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own bombeo.it?