Scanned sites / winnipeglashes.com

SEO report for winnipeglashes.com DR 5

The latest Site Spider scan of winnipeglashes.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/winnipeglashes-com/2026-09-14-1137.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-14 11:37:55 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 11:42:14 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://winnipeglashes.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

79/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 56 pages and 320 assets of winnipeglashes.com, starting from https://winnipeglashes.com/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (38), heavy assets (13), title tags (17); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6), heavy assets (−6), title tags (−3.3). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
56
Assets fetched
320
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

376 of 376 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 10 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags17 issues
    17 of 48 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.3 points
  • Meta descriptions38 issues
    38 of 48 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6 points
  • Headings4 issues
    4 of 48 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 5 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 10 destinations checked.
    −1.2 points
  • Redirects5 issues
    6 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses13 noted
    13 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 5 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 48 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 74 image references have no alt attribute. 3 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets13 issues
    13 assets larger than 500 KB among 320 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages5 issues
    5 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage22 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 35 URLs: 15 crawled pages missing, 2 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 5 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.6 points
  • Internal link counts3 noted
    Internal link counts for 51 pages; 3 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 48 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 56 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals3 noted
    3 of 51 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives51 noted
    51 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure3 noted
    3 of 48 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length29 noted
    29 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 51 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 376 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 51 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 62 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

winnipeglashes.com scores 79%, higher than 44% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites79% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has multiple SEO issues needing attention, primarily with redirects, title tags, and meta descriptions. Addressing these will improve visibility and user experience significantly. Here are the key priorities for fixes.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can slow down crawling and negatively affect SEO.

    How: Eliminate unnecessary redirects and avoid chaining by updating links directly.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Correct the URLs that return 301 responses to serve them directly if possible.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Overly long titles can be partially displayed in search results.

    How: Revise titles to under 60 characters to ensure visibility.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Fix Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing meta descriptions can lead to lost click-through opportunities.

    How: Add unique meta descriptions for all pages that currently lack them.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Missing Headings

    Why: Lack of headings can confuse search engines and impact content hierarchy.

    How: Add a proper H1 tag to pages that are missing it.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow page load times and negatively impact user experience.

    How: Compress images to reduce size while maintaining quality.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review of winnipeglashes.com identified several areas for improvement. The site uses outdated JavaScript libraries with known vulnerabilities, which could pose security risks depending on their implementation. Additionally, third-party scripts lack Subresource Integrity, making them potential attack vectors. Recommended actions include upgrading libraries and implementing security controls for external scripts.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Outdated jQuery Library (1.7.1) DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: This version has multiple vulnerabilities, including selector XSS, which could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later to mitigate risks.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  2. 2

    Outdated jQuery Library (3.1.1) DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: This version is vulnerable to issues such as prototype pollution and XSS.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later to resolve these vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  3. 3

    Third-party Scripts Missing Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Lack of SRI means a compromise of third-party scripts could alter site behavior.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity for external scripts or use a Content-Security-Policy to control script sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.7.1, jQuery 3.1.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.7.1 in https://winnipeglashes.com/site-extensions/hide-price-add-to-cart-button/assets…: CVE-2012-6708 (selector XSS), CVE-2015-9251, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023; fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 3.1.1 in https://winnipeglashes.com/site-extensions/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery.…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (2 script tags)
11 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 51 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 51 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 51 pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 51 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 51 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    No Server or X-Powered-By header is sent.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    4 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of winnipeglashes.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near winnipeglashes.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling winnipeglashes.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own winnipeglashes.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming winnipeglashes.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.