Scanned sites / lowryfamilypastures.com

SEO report for lowryfamilypastures.com DR 3

The latest Site Spider scan of lowryfamilypastures.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/lowryfamilypastures-com/2026-09-14-1900.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-14 19:00:02 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 19:04:45 UTC. Found on page 1 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results

Site: https://lowryfamilypastures.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

79/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 52 pages and 27 assets of lowryfamilypastures.com, starting from https://lowryfamilypastures.com/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (30), meta descriptions (28), sitemap coverage (36); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−6), meta descriptions (−4.5), sitemap coverage (−4.3). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Low3 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
52
Assets fetched
27
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

79 of 79 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 4 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags30 issues
    30 of 42 pages have title issues. 8 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6 points
  • Meta descriptions28 issues
    28 of 42 pages have meta description issues. 8 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.5 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 42 pages have heading issues. 8 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites50 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 4 destinations checked.
  • Redirects2 issues
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses22 noted
    22 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability5 issues
    5 of 50 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −1 points
  • Image alt text3 issues
    3 of 136 image references have no alt attribute.
    −0.1 points
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 27 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages38 issues
    38 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −3 points
  • Sitemap coverage36 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 47 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 36 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −4.3 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 50 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content10 issues
    10 of 42 pages have fewer than 200 words. 8 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.6 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format5 noted
    5 of 52 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals8 noted
    8 of 50 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 50 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure42 noted
    42 of 42 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 8 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length1 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 50 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 79 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 50 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 41 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

lowryfamilypastures.com scores 79%, higher than 44% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites79% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has several issues affecting SEO performance. Prioritized fixes focus on improving titles, meta descriptions, and error responses, which can significantly enhance site visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 22 URLs returning errors reduce site credibility and visibility.

    How: Redirect or remove the non-200 URLs found in findings.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 30 pages with title issues can hinder search results and click-through rates.

    How: Rewrite short titles to be more descriptive (30-60 characters).

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 27 pages lack or have ineffective meta descriptions impacting search visibility.

    How: Add or revise descriptions to be concise and appealing (50-160 characters).

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Improve Indexability

    Why: 5 pages with indexability warnings may limit their discoverability.

    How: Fix canonical tags to correctly point to intended pages or adjust indexing settings.

    Checks: indexability

  5. 5

    Add Alt Text to Images

    Why: 3 images without alt text may limit accessibility and search relevance.

    How: Add descriptive alt text to the images listed in findings.

    Checks: images-alt

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: 38 orphan pages are invisible to users, limiting engagement and SEO performance.

    How: Create internal links to orphan pages from relevant content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lowryfamilypastures.com has several security issues, including missing MIME sniffing protection and disclosing server version information. Implementing recommended security headers and practices can help mitigate risks. Pay attention to third-party scripts that lack integrity checks.

  • 0 high
  • 0 medium
  • 3 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may improperly execute files, risking XSS or data exposure.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  2. 2

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Exposing server version can allow attackers to exploit known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Hide server version by configuring your web server to not disclose version information; consider using a generic server header.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  3. 3

    Third-party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Without Subresource Integrity (SRI), compromised scripts from img1.wsimg.com and googletagmanager.com can alter site functionality.

    Fix: Implement SRI for any third-party scripts or set a Content-Security-Policy that specifies sourced hosts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://lowryfamilypastures.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lowryfamilypastures.com/about-us → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lowryfamilypastures.com/shop → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lowryfamilypastures.com/contact-us → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lowryfamilypastures.com/blog → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lowryfamilypastures.com/recipes → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lowryfamilypastures.com/shop?olsPage=cart → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lowryfamilypastures.com/m/create-account → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lowryfamilypastures.com/privacy-policy → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lowryfamilypastures.com/terms-and-conditions → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lowryfamilypastures.com/m/login?r=%2Fm%2Faccount → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lowryfamilypastures.com/m/login?r=%2Fm%2Forders → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: DPS/2.0.0+sha-9ac0622 (79 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • img1.wsimg.com (160 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
9 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 50 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 50 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    Every HTML page restricts framing through X-Frame-Options or a CSP frame-ancestors directive.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    49 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of lowryfamilypastures.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near lowryfamilypastures.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling lowryfamilypastures.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own lowryfamilypastures.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming lowryfamilypastures.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.