Scanned sites / thomasplumbingmt.com / 2026-09-11-2347

thomasplumbingmt.com scan from 2026-09-11 23:47:07 UTC DR 2

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-2347

Scanned 2026-09-11 23:47:07 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 00:22:14 UTC

Site: https://thomasplumbingmt.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

78/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 18 pages and 123 assets of thomasplumbingmt.com, starting from https://thomasplumbingmt.com/. It scored 78 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (12), sitemap coverage (8), heavy assets (5); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6), heavy assets (−3), sitemap coverage (−3). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
18
Assets fetched
123
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

141 of 147 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 failed, 5 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 4 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags3 issues
    3 of 13 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.9 points
  • Meta descriptions12 issues
    12 of 13 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6 points
  • Headings6 issues
    6 of 13 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.3 points
  • Broken links2 issues
    22 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −2.5 points
  • Links to other sites6 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 4 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    3 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 3 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −1.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 13 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 19 image references have no alt attribute. 3 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets5 issues
    5 assets larger than 500 KB among 123 fetched assets.
    −3 points
  • Orphan pages7 issues
    7 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.8 points
  • Sitemap coverage8 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 14 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 7 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3 points
  • Internal link counts3 noted
    Internal link counts for 16 pages; 3 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 13 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 18 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 16 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives16 noted
    16 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure7 noted
    7 of 13 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length1 noted
    1 image over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 16 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 141 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 16 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 40 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2864 sites, median 80%, average 79%

thomasplumbingmt.com scores 78%, higher than 39% of the 2864 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 131 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 121 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 81 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites78% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has several issues requiring attention, primarily broken links, non-200 responses, and title/meta description issues. Addressing these can enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links lead to poor user experience and can negatively affect SEO.

    How: Update or remove the links pointing to broken URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can prevent users from accessing content and affect crawlability.

    How: Fix the URLs returning errors to ensure they respond with a 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Improper title length can impact search visibility and user engagement.

    How: Shorten the titles on the affected pages to be under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing or long descriptions can reduce visibility in search engines.

    How: Create concise and unique meta descriptions under 160 characters for each page.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Correct Multiple Headings

    Why: Multiple H1 tags can confuse search engines regarding the page structure.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag and appropriate H2 tags for hierarchy.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages Internally

    Why: Orphan pages can't be found by users or crawlers, reducing their effectiveness.

    How: Create internal links to these pages from other relevant content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

This security review identifies several critical weaknesses in your website’s security configuration. Key issues include the absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security and protection against clickjacking. Addressing these vulnerabilities promptly will help safeguard your site and users.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted when visiting via HTTP. This could lead to man-in-the-middle attacks.

    Fix: Implement the following header: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains`.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absent X-Frame-Options allows your site to be framed, posing a clickjacking risk.

    Fix: Add this header to your responses: `X-Frame-Options: DENY` or a proper CSP frame-ancestors setting.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files as scripts based on their content instead of their declared type, leading to security risks.

    Fix: Add the header: `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` to your responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Using third-party scripts without integrity checks can lead to executing compromised or malicious scripts if any of these sources are compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing a Content-Security-Policy that allows the necessary script sources or use Subresource Integrity for all script tags.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The presence of sensitive paths in robots.txt can inform attackers about private areas of your application, which should have real access control instead.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive directories like /wp-admin/ through server-side security measures, not just robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/plumbing-services-missoula/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/heating-services-missoula/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/drain-cleaning/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/plumber-writing-on-clipboard/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/plumber-screwing-plumbing-fittings-in-bathroom/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/business-06/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/business-15/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/business-16/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/newthomaslogo_final/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 16 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/plumbing-services-missoula/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/heating-services-missoula/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/drain-cleaning/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/plumber-writing-on-clipboard/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/plumber-screwing-plumbing-fittings-in-bathroom/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/business-06/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/business-15/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/business-16/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/newthomaslogo_final/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/plumbing-services-missoula/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/heating-services-missoula/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/drain-cleaning/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/plumber-writing-on-clipboard/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/plumber-screwing-plumbing-fittings-in-bathroom/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/business-06/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/business-15/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/business-16/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://thomasplumbingmt.com/newthomaslogo_final/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (6 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (14 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 16 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 16 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    30 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near thomasplumbingmt.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling thomasplumbingmt.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own thomasplumbingmt.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming thomasplumbingmt.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.