Scanned sites / freshandcosalons.com

SEO report for freshandcosalons.com DR 4

The latest Site Spider scan of freshandcosalons.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/freshandcosalons-com/2026-09-12-0312.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 03:12:03 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 09:30:45 UTC

Site: https://freshandcosalons.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

78/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 290 pages and 1126 assets of freshandcosalons.com, starting from https://freshandcosalons.com/. It scored 78 out of 100, a good result. 6 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by indexability (261), meta descriptions (277), title tags (109); 14 checks passed. Most of the points went to indexability (−9.4), meta descriptions (−7.9), title tags (−3.9). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
290
Assets fetched
1126
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
6 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,416 of 1,416 discovered URLs were fetched, 26 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 35 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags109 issues
    109 of 279 pages have title issues.
    −3.9 points
  • Meta descriptions277 issues
    277 of 279 pages have meta description issues.
    −7.9 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 279 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sitesOK
    0 destinations answered with an error, of 35 destinations checked.
  • Redirects11 issues
    13 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses13 noted
    13 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 11 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability261 issues
    261 of 279 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −9.4 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 217 image references have no alt attribute. 11 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 1126 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage18 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 18 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.4 points
  • Internal link counts88 noted
    Internal link counts for 279 pages; 88 worth a look.
  • Thin content3 issues
    3 of 279 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −0.1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 290 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 279 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives279 noted
    279 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure261 noted
    261 of 279 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length55 noted
    55 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 279 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 1416 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 279 pages; 225 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights2 noted
    Mobile performance 90 on average across 5 pages; 2 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2863 sites, median 80%, average 79%

freshandcosalons.com scores 78%, higher than 39% of the 2863 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 75 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 131 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 81 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites78% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Multiple issues detected that can impact visibility and user experience. Prioritize addressing redirects, title tags, and sitemap coverage for significant SEO improvements.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Fixing the 13 redirecting URLs improves user experience and SEO.

    How: Update links to point directly to the final URLs instead of the redirecting ones.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Correcting the 13 non-200 URLs enhances site accessibility.

    How: Review and update the URLs to ensure they return a 2xx status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Shorten Title Tags

    Why: Optimizing 109 title tags enhances search engine visibility.

    How: Revise titles to be less than 60 characters while retaining key terms.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Shortening 272 long meta descriptions can boost click-through rates.

    How: Edit descriptions to be under 160 characters, keeping essential information.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Including 18 missing pages in the sitemap improves indexing.

    How: Regenerate the sitemap and ensure all relevant pages are listed.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Enrich Thin Content Pages

    Why: Improving 3 thin content pages can enhance user engagement.

    How: Add more relevant content to each page to exceed 200 words.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review of freshandcosalons.com identifies several essential headers missing that could expose the site to risks such as script injection and clickjacking. Implementing these headers is crucial to enhance the security posture of your website.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted on their first request when entering the site without 'https://'.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: No CSP header means potential loading of malicious scripts or content from unauthorized sources.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: No protection against clickjacking allows embedding the site in a frame which can manipulate user interaction.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret files leading to potential script execution.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be modified, potentially harming site security.

    Fix: Consider implementing a Content-Security-Policy that restricts external scripts, or use Subresource Integrity for all third-party scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: robots.txt can provide insights into private directories that may not be properly secured.

    Fix: Implement proper access controls on sensitive paths such as /wp-admin/ rather than relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://freshandcosalons.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/balayage/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/hair-extensions/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/blonding/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/colour-correction/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/hair-botox/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/bridal-special-occasion-hair/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/stylists/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/locations/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/locations/ellerslie/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/locations/mullen-way/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 279 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://freshandcosalons.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/balayage/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/hair-extensions/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/blonding/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/colour-correction/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/hair-botox/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/bridal-special-occasion-hair/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/stylists/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/locations/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/locations/ellerslie/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/locations/mullen-way/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://freshandcosalons.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/balayage/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/hair-extensions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/blonding/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/colour-correction/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/hair-botox/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/bridal-special-occasion-hair/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/stylists/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/locations/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/locations/ellerslie/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/locations/mullen-way/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://freshandcosalons.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/balayage/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/hair-extensions/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/blonding/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/colour-correction/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/hair-botox/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/services/bridal-special-occasion-hair/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/stylists/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/locations/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/locations/ellerslie/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://freshandcosalons.com/locations/mullen-way/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 279 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    26 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of freshandcosalons.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near freshandcosalons.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling freshandcosalons.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own freshandcosalons.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming freshandcosalons.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.