Scanned sites / theeyepros.com

SEO report for theeyepros.com DR 26

The latest Site Spider scan of theeyepros.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/theeyepros-com/2026-09-14-0512.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-14 05:12:41 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 06:06:44 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://theeyepros.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

87/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 424 pages and 1097 assets of theeyepros.com, starting from https://theeyepros.com/. It scored 87 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (67), sitemap coverage (173), links to other sites (14); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−2.8), links to other sites (−1.5). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
424
Assets fetched
1097
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,521 of 1,521 discovered URLs were fetched, 1,552 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 143 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags45 issues
    45 of 173 pages have title issues. 204 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.2 points
  • Meta descriptions55 issues
    55 of 173 pages have meta description issues. 204 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.2 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 173 pages have heading issues. 204 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites14 issues
    14 destinations answered with an error, 54 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 143 destinations checked.
    −1.5 points
  • Redirects47 issues
    48 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.5 points
  • Non-200 responses50 noted
    50 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 47 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 201 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 176 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 4223 image references have no alt attribute. 1645 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets67 issues
    67 assets larger than 500 KB among 1097 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage173 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 173 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.8 points
  • Internal link counts190 noted
    Internal link counts for 377 pages; 190 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 173 pages have fewer than 200 words. 204 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format35 noted
    35 of 424 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals204 noted
    204 of 377 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives377 noted
    377 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text122 noted
    122 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure41 noted
    41 of 173 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 204 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length340 noted
    159 images over 100 KB; 181 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 377 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 1521 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 377 pages; 294 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 41 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2701 sites, median 80%, average 78%

theeyepros.com scores 87%, higher than 79% of the 2701 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0631260%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 16 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 40 sites67%: 40 sites68%: 39 sites69%: 50 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 78 sites72%: 74 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 77 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 96 sites77%: 107 sites78%: 123 sites79%: 109 sites80%: 124 sites81%: 120 sites82%: 122 sites83%: 118 sites84%: 126 sites85%: 102 sites86%: 90 sites87%: 91 sites88%: 77 sites89%: 72 sites90%: 51 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 23 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 75 sites87% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has several SEO issues that need fixing. Prioritize addressing redirects, non-200 responses, title and meta description issues for better visibility and performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Reduce chains and improve user experience.

    How: Remove unnecessary redirects and replace old URLs with new ones where applicable.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Improve accessibility and indexing of your content.

    How: Identify and fix the 50 URLs that do not return a 2xx status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Enhance click-through rates and SEO performance.

    How: Revise the 45 pages with title issues to meet optimal length and relevance.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Correct Meta Descriptions

    Why: Provide better descriptions to improve search result visibility.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for the 50 pages currently missing them.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Ensure proper structure for better SEO and readability.

    How: Amend the 2 pages that have multiple H1 tags to have a single H1 and appropriate H2s.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Improve Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Ensure all valuable pages are indexed by search engines.

    How: Update your sitemap to include the 173 crawled pages that are missing from it.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks several important security headers, which can expose it to various attacks, like clickjacking and interception on initial requests. Immediate implementation of security headers is essential to enhance the site's protection.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users typing the address without HTTPS can be intercepted on the first request.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to your HTTP headers.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows scripts, styles, and frames to be loaded from any source, increasing XSS risks.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy, e.g., 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' www.googletagmanager.com;'

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, pages can be embedded in frames, risking clickjacking.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' or 'X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN' to prevent embedding.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Not having this header can lead to MIME sniffing, allowing file dangers based on content rather than type.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to your HTTP headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from other domains run without integrity checks, risking changes if compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing a Content-Security-Policy that restricts script sources or use Subresource Integrity for third-party scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://theeyepros.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://theeyepros.com/patient-portal-patient-forms/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://theeyepros.com/appointment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://theeyepros.com/order-contacts/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://theeyepros.com/make-a-payment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://theeyepros.com/locations/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-boise/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-coeur-dalene-optometrist/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-idaho-falls/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-layton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-logan/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-meridian/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 377 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://theeyepros.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://theeyepros.com/patient-portal-patient-forms/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://theeyepros.com/appointment/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://theeyepros.com/order-contacts/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://theeyepros.com/make-a-payment/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://theeyepros.com/locations/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-boise/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-coeur-dalene-optometrist/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-idaho-falls/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-layton/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-logan/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-meridian/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://theeyepros.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/patient-portal-patient-forms/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/appointment/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/order-contacts/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/make-a-payment/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/locations/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-boise/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-coeur-dalene-optometrist/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-idaho-falls/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-layton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-logan/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-meridian/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://theeyepros.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/patient-portal-patient-forms/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/appointment/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/order-contacts/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/make-a-payment/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/locations/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-boise/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-coeur-dalene-optometrist/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-idaho-falls/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-layton/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-logan/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://theeyepros.com/eye-doctor-meridian/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 6 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (80 script tags)
    • idahoeyepros.vsappointments.com (80 script tags)
    • cdn.gtranslate.net (40 script tags)
    • eyeappointforms.com (2 script tags)
    • elfsightcdn.com (44 script tags)
    • eyeappointshops.com (1 script tag)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 377 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    14 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of theeyepros.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near theeyepros.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling theeyepros.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own theeyepros.com?