Scanned sites / chaparralvet.com

SEO report for chaparralvet.com DR 5

The latest Site Spider scan of chaparralvet.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/chaparralvet-com/2026-09-14-2043.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-14 20:43:12 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 20:55:01 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://chaparralvet.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

87/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 27 pages and 149 assets of chaparralvet.com, starting from https://chaparralvet.com/. It scored 87 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (18), thin content (5), image alt text (48); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6), thin content (−1.7), image alt text (−1.4). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
27
Assets fetched
149
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

176 of 176 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 25 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags1 issue
    1 of 24 pages have title issues.
    −0.4 points
  • Meta descriptions18 issues
    18 of 24 pages have meta description issues.
    −6 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 24 pages have heading issues.
    −0.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites123 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 8 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 13 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses3 issues
    6 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 3 of them are pages, 3 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −1.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 24 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt text48 issues
    48 of 200 image references have no alt attribute. 57 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −1.4 points
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 149 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage4 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 27 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 24 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content5 issues
    5 of 24 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −1.7 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format15 noted
    15 of 27 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 24 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives24 noted
    24 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text12 noted
    12 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 24 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length5 noted
    5 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 24 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 176 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 24 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 60 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2712 sites, median 80%, average 78%

chaparralvet.com scores 87%, higher than 79% of the 2712 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0641270%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 16 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 40 sites67%: 40 sites68%: 39 sites69%: 50 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 78 sites72%: 74 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 77 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 96 sites77%: 107 sites78%: 123 sites79%: 109 sites80%: 124 sites81%: 120 sites82%: 124 sites83%: 118 sites84%: 127 sites85%: 102 sites86%: 91 sites87%: 91 sites88%: 78 sites89%: 72 sites90%: 53 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 23 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 79 sites87% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has a few critical issues that need addressing, particularly related to non-200 responses and missing metadata. Prioritizing fixes for these issues will enhance SEO performance significantly.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 6 URLs return non-2xx statuses, affecting indexability.

    How: Resolve the 404 errors for the specified URLs.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 1 title tag exceeds optimal length, hindering search visibility.

    How: Shorten the title tag for https://chaparralvet.com/vc_service/usa-sv-a-stamp-elbow-certification/ to under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Add Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: 17 meta descriptions are either missing or too long, affecting click-through rates.

    How: Create concise meta descriptions for missing entries and ensure all comply with length guidelines.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Add H1 Tags

    Why: Two pages lack H1 tags, which are crucial for SEO.

    How: Add appropriate H1 tags for https://chaparralvet.com/new-client-form/ and https://chaparralvet.com/vello/.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Improve Image Alt Attributes

    Why: 48 images lack alt attributes, impacting accessibility and SEO.

    How: Add descriptive alt text to all images without it across the site.

    Checks: images-alt

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Page

    Why: 1 identified orphan page does not receive internal links, limiting discoverability.

    How: Add internal links to https://chaparralvet.com/calgary-pet-vet/ from relevant pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security issues that need to be addressed to protect it from potential threats. Key improvements include implementing HTTP Strict Transport Security, a Content Security Policy, and clickjacking protection. Additionally, consider managing third-party scripts and reviewing the exposed paths in your robots.txt file for better security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, initial requests without HTTPS are vulnerable to interception.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows unrestricted script, style, and frame loading, increasing risk of attacks.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header allows clickjacking vulnerabilities, where your site can be embedded in another page.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Third-party Scripts Lack Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can change site behavior if those domains are compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity (SRI) for each script tag or using a CSP to restrict origins.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Robots.txt publicly discloses paths that may need access restrictions.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths using proper server-level access controls.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://chaparralvet.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://chaparralvet.com/new-client-form/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://chaparralvet.com/what-to-expect/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://chaparralvet.com/videos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://chaparralvet.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://chaparralvet.com/our-team/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://chaparralvet.com/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://chaparralvet.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://chaparralvet.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://chaparralvet.com/vello/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://chaparralvet.com/vc_teammember/kamila/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://chaparralvet.com/vc_service/routine-wellness/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 24 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://chaparralvet.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://chaparralvet.com/new-client-form/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://chaparralvet.com/what-to-expect/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://chaparralvet.com/videos/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://chaparralvet.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://chaparralvet.com/our-team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://chaparralvet.com/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://chaparralvet.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://chaparralvet.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://chaparralvet.com/vello/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://chaparralvet.com/vc_teammember/kamila/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://chaparralvet.com/vc_service/routine-wellness/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://chaparralvet.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://chaparralvet.com/new-client-form/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://chaparralvet.com/what-to-expect/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://chaparralvet.com/videos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://chaparralvet.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://chaparralvet.com/our-team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://chaparralvet.com/careers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://chaparralvet.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://chaparralvet.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://chaparralvet.com/vello/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://chaparralvet.com/vc_teammember/kamila/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://chaparralvet.com/vc_service/routine-wellness/ → no x-frame-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (24 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (24 script tags)
    • kit.fontawesome.com (24 script tags)
    • cdn.callrail.com (24 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 24 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 24 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of chaparralvet.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near chaparralvet.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling chaparralvet.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own chaparralvet.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming chaparralvet.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.