Scanned sites / surferseo.com / 2026-09-13-0336

surferseo.com scan from 2026-09-13 03:36:07 UTC DR 85

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for surferseo.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0336

Scanned 2026-09-13 03:36:07 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 05:21:26 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Site: https://surferseo.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

75/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 833 pages and 3 assets of surferseo.com, starting from https://surferseo.com/. It scored 75 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by indexability (598), meta descriptions (335), title tags (264); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to indexability (−9.8), meta descriptions (−4.4), title tags (−4.3). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
833
Assets fetched
3
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

836 of 836 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 1595 left unchecked.

  • Title tags264 issues
    264 of 597 pages have title issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.3 points
  • Meta descriptions335 issues
    335 of 597 pages have meta description issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.4 points
  • Headings118 issues
    118 of 597 pages have heading issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.2 points
  • Broken links20 issues
    71 internal links point at 20 broken URLs.
    −0.7 points
  • Links to other sites6 issues
    6 destinations answered with an error, 65 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 1595 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects249 issues
    202 redirecting URLs, 119 of them chained.
    −1.6 points
  • Non-200 responses22 issues
    224 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 223 of them are pages, 22 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.4 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability598 issues
    598 of 597 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 13 pages noindex by design. 1 noindex page is listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore it.
    −9.8 points
  • Image alt text284 issues
    284 of 17247 image references have no alt attribute. 12545 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.1 points
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 3 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages26 issues
    26 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage89 issues
    1 sitemap listing 542 URLs: 60 crawled pages missing, 4 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 24 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.9 points
  • Internal link counts38 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 38 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 597 pages have fewer than 200 words. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content50 issues
    17 groups of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.7 points
  • URL format63 noted
    63 of 833 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals610 noted
    610 of 610 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives13 noted
    13 pages carry a robots directive; 597 carry none.
  • Anchor text133 noted
    133 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure525 noted
    525 of 597 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length16 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 16 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies74 noted
    74 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s1 noted
    1 page answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 836 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 610 pages; 229 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 46 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2334 sites, median 79%, average 78%

surferseo.com scores 75%, higher than 32% of the 2334 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 109 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 72 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites75% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has several technical issues impacting SEO performance. Key priorities include fixing broken links, redirect chains, and title/meta description problems. Addressing these can improve user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 71 internal links lead to 20 broken URLs, damaging user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify broken links through the crawl report, update or remove links on the affected pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirect Chains

    Why: 119 chained redirects can slow down the site and confuse search engines.

    How: Audit all redirects and streamline multiple redirects to a single destination URL.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Correct Non-200 Responses

    Why: 224 URLs not returning 2xx responses can harm indexing and user experience.

    How: Review URLs with non-200 responses and either fix the errors or redirect them to functional pages.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 264 title issues can hinder search visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Revise titles to ensure they are concise, engaging, and under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 293 problems with meta descriptions can affect search rankings and CTR.

    How: Update meta descriptions to be appealing and within the 160 character limit.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: 118 pages have heading issues affecting content structure and readability.

    How: Ensure every page has one H1 and appropriately structured H2s and H3s.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks critical security headers, exposing it to various attacks such as content injection and clickjacking. Implementing recommended headers will enhance security and reduce risk.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of a Content Security Policy allows unrestricted script and resource loading, increasing the risk of cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header, e.g., "Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';" to restrict resource loading.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, the site is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks as pages can be embedded in unauthorized frames.

    Fix: Include the header: "X-Frame-Options: DENY" to prevent framing from any origin.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Not setting X-Content-Type-Options may allow browsers to execute harmful content as scripts if misidentified.

    Fix: Add: "X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff" to enforce strict MIME type checking.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Running scripts from multiple third-party domains without Subresource Integrity leaves the site exposed to potential script tampering.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity (SRI) for all script tags or a strong Content Security Policy to restrict allowed domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 610 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://surferseo.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://surferseo.com/pricing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://surferseo.com/enterprise/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://surferseo.com/blog/why-use-surfer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://surferseo.com/updates/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://surferseo.com/mcp/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://surferseo.com/ai-tracker/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://surferseo.com/content-audit/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://surferseo.com/content-editor/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://surferseo.com/topical-map/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://surferseo.com/blog/sites/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://surferseo.com/solutions/marketing-manager/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://surferseo.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://surferseo.com/pricing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://surferseo.com/enterprise/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://surferseo.com/blog/why-use-surfer/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://surferseo.com/updates/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://surferseo.com/mcp/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://surferseo.com/ai-tracker/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://surferseo.com/content-audit/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://surferseo.com/content-editor/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://surferseo.com/topical-map/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://surferseo.com/blog/sites/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://surferseo.com/solutions/marketing-manager/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://surferseo.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://surferseo.com/pricing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://surferseo.com/enterprise/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://surferseo.com/blog/why-use-surfer/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://surferseo.com/updates/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://surferseo.com/mcp/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://surferseo.com/ai-tracker/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://surferseo.com/content-audit/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://surferseo.com/content-editor/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://surferseo.com/topical-map/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://surferseo.com/blog/sites/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://surferseo.com/solutions/marketing-manager/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 12 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • ajax.googleapis.com (40 script tags)
    • assets.surferseo.art (255 script tags)
    • d3e54v103j8qbb.cloudfront.net (33 script tags)
    • marketing-assets.surferseo.art (231 script tags)
    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (5 script tags)
    • unpkg.com (3 script tags)
    • js-eu1.hsforms.net (1 script tag)
    • apis.google.com (1 script tag)
    • hubspotv2.use1-marketplace-1p-apps-prod-red.if.webflow.services (1 script tag)
    • app.surferseo.com (3 script tags)
    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (2 script tags)
    • www.google.com (2 script tags)
8 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 610 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 610 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    59 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near surferseo.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling surferseo.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own surferseo.com?