Scanned sites / everytask.io

SEO report for everytask.io DR 4

The latest Site Spider scan of everytask.io, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/everytask-io/2026-10-08-1704.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 10/8/2026, 5:04:14 PM, finished 10/8/2026, 5:07:29 PM

Site: https://everytask.io/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

87/ 100Good

On October 8, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 188 pages and 188 assets of everytask.io, starting from https://everytask.io/. It scored 87 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 23 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (16), title tags (43), headings (31); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−2.6), headings (−1.1). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
188
Assets fetched
188
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 23
CoverageComplete crawl

376 of 376 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 6 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags43 issues
    43 of 137 pages have title issues. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.6 points
  • Meta descriptions19 issues
    19 of 137 pages have meta description issues. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.9 points
  • Headings31 issues
    31 of 137 pages have heading issues. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 6 destinations checked.
    −0.3 points
  • Redirects17 issues
    17 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses7 issues
    24 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 24 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.4 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 137 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 27 pages noindex by design.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 732 image references have no alt attribute. 728 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets16 issues
    16 assets larger than 500 KB among 188 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages12 issues
    12 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage11 issues
    1 sitemap listing 141 URLs: 3 crawled pages missing, 7 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.4 points
  • Internal link counts16 noted
    Internal link counts for 164 pages; 16 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 137 pages have fewer than 200 words. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content7 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.3 points
  • URL format38 noted
    38 of 188 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals28 noted
    28 of 164 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives27 noted
    27 pages carry a robots directive; 137 carry none.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure2 noted
    2 of 137 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length9 noted
    9 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2160 sites, median 79%, average 78%

everytask.io scores 87%, higher than 81% of the 2160 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0541080%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 2 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 2 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 6 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 4 sites50%: 4 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 9 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 8 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 6 sites60%: 14 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 24 sites64%: 18 sites65%: 37 sites66%: 29 sites67%: 33 sites68%: 33 sites69%: 38 sites70%: 42 sites71%: 66 sites72%: 73 sites73%: 66 sites74%: 60 sites75%: 74 sites76%: 80 sites77%: 90 sites78%: 97 sites79%: 87 sites80%: 104 sites81%: 101 sites82%: 108 sites83%: 89 sites84%: 98 sites85%: 73 sites86%: 66 sites87%: 64 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 57 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 39 sites92%: 27 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 13 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 5 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 1 site100%: 61 sites87% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Fixing redirect issues and optimizing titles, meta descriptions, and headings will improve visibility. Addressing indexability and sitemap issues will further enhance crawability and efficiency.

  1. 1

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: 17 URLs redirect, potentially impacting user experience and SEO ranking.

    How: Update these URLs to direct users to the final target URL without redirection.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 24 non-200 responses can lead to user frustration and affect site authority.

    How: Identify the pages causing errors and either fix or remove them.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 43 pages with title issues can harm SEO performance.

    How: Shorten titles to under 60 characters for all affected pages.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 19 pages with description issues prevent optimal click-through rates.

    How: Revise descriptions to be under 160 characters, focusing on key terms.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Correct Heading Structure

    Why: 31 pages with heading issues can confuse both users and search engines.

    How: Ensure each page has a unique H1 and uses H2s and H3s appropriately.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Address Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 1 sitemap has broken URLs jeopardizing search engine indexing.

    How: Update your sitemap to remove broken links and add missing URLs.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has a Content Security Policy that permits inline and eval scripts, weakening its security. Additionally, sensitive paths are disclosed in the public robots.txt, which may expose the site to probing attacks. Immediate remediation is recommended.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 0 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Weak Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: The Content Security Policy allows 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval', reducing protection against code injection.

    Fix: Modify the CSP to disallow 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval'. Example: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; script-src 'self' https://js.stripe.com https://apis.google.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.googletagma`.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The public robots.txt lists a private path, which could expose sensitive areas of the site to attackers.

    Fix: Restrict access to the sensitive path or remove it from robots.txt. Example: Remove `Disallow: /private/` or implement proper access control.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • NoteContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.

    • https://everytask.io/ → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://apis.google.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.googletagma
    • https://everytask.io/features/edit-and-annotate-pdfs → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://apis.google.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.googletagma
    • https://everytask.io/features/fill-and-sign-pdf → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://apis.google.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.googletagma
    • https://everytask.io/features/organize-pdf-pages → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://apis.google.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.googletagma
    • https://everytask.io/workspace → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://apis.google.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.googletagma
    • https://everytask.io/workflows → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://apis.google.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.googletagma
    • https://everytask.io/agencies → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://apis.google.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.googletagma
    • https://everytask.io/agencies/marketing-agencies → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://apis.google.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.googletagma
    • https://everytask.io/agencies/design-agencies → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://apis.google.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.googletagma
    • https://everytask.io/agencies/creative-agencies → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://apis.google.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.googletagma
    • https://everytask.io/integrations → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://apis.google.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.googletagma
    • https://everytask.io/templates → default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://apis.google.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.googletagma
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /private/
12 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 164 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 164 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 164 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 164 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 164 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 164 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of everytask.io

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near everytask.io

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling everytask.io from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own everytask.io?

everytask.io SEO report | DIY SEO Hub