Scanned sites / seonix.ai / 2026-11-04-1250

seonix.ai scan from 2026-11-04 12:50:37 UTC DR 8

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-04-1250

Scanned 2026-11-04 12:50:37 UTC, finished 2026-11-04 13:14:36 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Site: https://seonix.ai/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

94/ 100Excellent

On November 4, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 189 pages and 317 assets of seonix.ai, starting from https://seonix.ai/. It scored 94 out of 100, an excellent result. 6 of 32 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (101), heavy assets (2), title tags (7); 15 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−4.3), heavy assets (−1.2), title tags (−0.4). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 5 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
189
Assets fetched
317
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
6 of 32
CoverageComplete crawl

506 of 506 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 46 link destinations on other sites have not been checked.

  • Title tags7 issues
    7 of 182 pages have title issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Meta descriptions101 issues
    101 of 182 pages have meta description issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.3 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 182 pages have heading issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sitesNot checked
    Not checked: the crawl fetched nothing this check can look at.
  • RedirectsOK
    0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responsesOK
    0 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 182 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 7 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1064 image references have no alt attribute. 64 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets2 issues
    2 assets larger than 500 KB among 317 fetched assets.
    −1.2 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage2 issues
    1 sitemap listing 182 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.1 points
  • Internal link counts7 noted
    Internal link counts for 189 pages; 7 worth a look.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 182 pages have fewer than 200 words. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 189 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals3 noted
    3 of 189 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives7 noted
    7 pages carry a robots directive; 182 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure46 noted
    46 of 182 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length93 noted
    85 images over 100 KB; 8 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 189 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    178 pages declare hreflang, with 494 annotations, and every one checks out.
  • Structured data36 noted
    182 of 182 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (180), ListItem (180), Organization (170), WebSite (170), WebPage (164). 36 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 182 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 189 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions9 noted
    9 of 180 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    3 pages in pagination sequences; 0 with problems.
  • Headers and cookies1 noted
    1 cookie set by the site, 1 missing a protective flag; 16 response headers recorded across 506 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 189 pages; 48 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling127 noted
    127 words an English dictionary does not know, on 96 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2850 sites, median 80%, average 79%

seonix.ai scores 94%, higher than 92% of the 2850 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0741470%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 80 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 130 sites79%: 113 sites80%: 125 sites81%: 123 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 129 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 74 sites90%: 54 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 147 sites94% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site's health is excellent with limited issues. Focus on fixing title tags, meta descriptions, and addressing heavy assets for improved performance and SEO.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tag Issues

    Why: 7 pages have short title tags, affecting search visibility.

    How: Update titles to exceed 30 characters for better SEO.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 101 pages have meta description problems, risking truncation in search results.

    How: Revise meta descriptions to be concise and under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Shrink Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down your site and impact user experience.

    How: Compress or optimize the following: CSS and JS files, and images.

    Evidence: 182 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 189 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    189 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  4. 4

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: 2 pages have no internal links, limiting their visibility.

    How: Add internal links to the orphan pages from relevant content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  5. 5

    Review Thin Content

    Why: 2 pages have fewer than 200 words, which may not be informative enough.

    How: Expand these pages with relevant content to enhance value.

    Checks: thin-content

  6. 6

    Improve Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 2 pages are only reachable via the sitemap, reducing crawlability.

    How: Ensure these pages are internally linked from other content.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has several security issues to address. Priority should be given to enhancing cookie security to protect sensitive data and improving Content Security Policy to mitigate script injection vulnerabilities. Additionally, the presence of sensitive paths in robots.txt requires careful handling.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Insecure Cookie FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Missing flags on cookies can expose them to security threats, allowing unauthorized access.

    Fix: Set the following flags for the cookie 'sx_consent_required': HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite=Strict.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  2. 2

    Weak Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Using 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' reduces protection against script injection attacks.

    Fix: Remove 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' from the script-src directive in your Content Security Policy.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Framework Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Exposing the framework in X-Powered-By may provide attackers with useful information for targeting vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Remove or modify the X-Powered-By header in server responses to prevent disclosing details about the framework.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  4. 4

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Public access to sensitive paths can lead to information exposure or attacks.

    Fix: Implement proper access controls for the listed paths and consider removing them from robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    1 of 1 cookie are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • sx_consent_required (set by https://seonix.ai/) lacks HttpOnly
  • NoteContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.

    • https://seonix.ai/ → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/integrations → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/pricing → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/start → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/start?plan=starter&period=monthly → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/how-it-works → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/automated-seo → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/saas-seo → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/custom-website-seo → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/mcp → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/plugins → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/plugins/optimizer → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: Vercel (506 responses)
    • x-powered-by: Next.js (61 responses)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 14 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /admin
    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /admin
    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /admin
    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /admin
    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /admin
    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /admin
    • Disallow: /admin/
11 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 189 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 189 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 189 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 189 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 189 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 189 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    11 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near seonix.ai

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling seonix.ai from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own seonix.ai?